Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Big Claim aginst RBOS


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5361 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Sparkie you inspire me!

 

You should triumph on determination alone. Subscribed

 

Good luck

 

FC

Barclaycard: SETTLED AFTER LBA

Barclays 1: AT COURT

Barclays 2: WITH FOS

Capital One: SETTLED AFTER N1

Egg: SETTLED AFTER LBA

HFC: S.A.R - (Subject Access Request)

Lloyds TSB: S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) - WITH Information Commissioners Office

RBS: AT COURT

Link to post
Share on other sites

Power to Sparkie!!

 

This story just gets better and better :D

If my post has been useful, tip my scales and let me know

 

Always start with the User guide!

Stuck with RBS charges? Click here!!

 

RBS CA1 £2794 SETTLED!!! RBS CA2 £503 SETTLED!!! HBOS CC £498 SETTLED!!! Barclaycard £705 (with CCI) ONGOING!!! NATWEST CA ONGOING!!! LLOYDS CA x 2, CC, LOAN ONGOING!!! HFC LOAN ONGOING!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thought you might be interested in this thread also?

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/natwest-bank/84079-unknown-thousands-my-bank.html

 

It's about someone in the opposite situation.

They had Thousands of pounds deposited into their bank account which they knew nothing about?

When they quite honestly and openly brought it to the attention of the Bank, the Bank's attitude was in short "...it's not our problem" ??!!

Perhaps Bankfodder, and your journalist may be interested in this also, as further evidence of how the Banks can often transfer money about without any justification or authority, and then deny any knowledge, or fail to be interested in investigating or dealing with it?

 

PM

All opinions and advice I offer are purely my own, and are offered without any liability. If unsure seek the help of a licensed professional

...just because something's in print doesn't mean its true.... just look at you Banks T&C's for example !

Link to post
Share on other sites

HA HA !!

 

Just realised this error was made by Natwest...... and guess who owns Natwest ???

 

RBOS !!!!!

All opinions and advice I offer are purely my own, and are offered without any liability. If unsure seek the help of a licensed professional

...just because something's in print doesn't mean its true.... just look at you Banks T&C's for example !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I've got a claim against RBOS too, the bank have put in their defence and I have been asked to complete an allocation questionairre which I should return to my local county court. They have asked me one question which I need really need help with, they have asked that I 'specify the clause(s) pursuant to which the charges were applied'. Sorry if I seem a little dumb but can anyone explain what this means?

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your help - I'll let you know how I get on. It's all a bit daunting at the moment, I didn't think it would go this far, I'm only claiming just under £2,000 for goodness sake (peanuts to the RBOS)!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sparkie, if you're concerned about the implications for the site, why don't you create a webpage about it Tom Brennan style and link everyone to it.

 

I would think it would get a lot of exposure.

 

I for one would be interested in the whole story and I think a lot of people would.

If my post has been useful, tip my scales and let me know

 

Always start with the User guide!

Stuck with RBS charges? Click here!!

 

RBS CA1 £2794 SETTLED!!! RBS CA2 £503 SETTLED!!! HBOS CC £498 SETTLED!!! Barclaycard £705 (with CCI) ONGOING!!! NATWEST CA ONGOING!!! LLOYDS CA x 2, CC, LOAN ONGOING!!! HFC LOAN ONGOING!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

:D me too

OK I GIVE IN

 

Halifax £3600 charges, won with C/I £6400

 

NatWest S.A.R-05/06/06

Bug**r all recieved 03/11/06

Prelim guesimate sent for £3000 03/11/06

Cr*p one CONNED statements 08/06 ROFLMAO

Cr*p one charges=£976

con int 34.9% £1,003.75 £1,979.75.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sparkie,

 

Been following your case for a while, I agree it would be good to see in full.....;)

 

Good Luck!!!

 

Ging

Stage 1 - RBS SAR sent 05/03/07

Statements recieved 25/04/07 - £1483 + £88 o/d int

LBA dpa sent requesting ALL data held 09/04 with original 40 day timetable..

Clock is ticking........;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sparkie - If you can file this complaint against RBS, and keep it going despite their best efforts - you can do anything!!!

 

Jope you do it, I'd like to read it in full.

 

I spend far too much time on this site now reading about everybody's journey!!! I gues am just nosey!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sparkie i think it would cost you more to set up a pay scheme like that. What you could do it have a donate link and just hyperlink that straight to CAG.

 

I was thinking about what you were saying re content. If you have it written up in word, then publishing it would be a piece if cake. Create a chapter structure, either on a time line, e.g. 1998-2005 then a month/week/day listing of what has happened. If you have an scans of documentation you can link that in, emails etc. The structure means you have have a content listing for navagtion. I have published a couple of website and then bit i found most difficult was the content, which you have. Structure is a walk in the park.

 

Keep up the great work.

 

StyX

 

p.s. If you need any help with creating a site then please feel free to count of me for any help or assistance i can provide.

StyX Has Won

 

RBS - £2,500

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5361 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...