Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • going nowhere then. well if you've not been simply doing it to look the big cheese to your mates, you need to address why you are doing it. if its to impress your mates then simply stop being an idiot eh? , learn from it and go live your life . dx
    • Yes only with dwf. The first letter I received was explaining that I have not responded to the first letter they sent which I did not receive at all  then the second letter came, they said again saying we have not heard from you we are extending this another 14 days but at that point a couple of days before I called them on the phone saying I have received this and supposedly i owe money for stolen goods and that I need to see the breakdown which they then emailed to me dwf said this was what we were trying to send to you at first and I told them we have not received your first letter only one asking for demand of payment. On my second call to them I asked can you list the things that I have supposedly stole to which they replied “we normally have this on file but I can’t seem to find this on your file”   
    • oh well, at least your eign of terror is over now. so no contact directly since from/to sainsbury's. everything since has only been with DWF?
    • Replying to above  this was on the day that two store detectives approached me and my friend and took us into the back room and spoke to us when they explained they have been watching
    • as my learned friend above...and.. sadly because just like DCA's and initially yourself in this case, you believed they have some magical powers ...they DON'T. 85% of people blindly pay DCA's cause they know no better and think they are BAILIFFS. only the RETAILER can ever do court and none have done this on a silly member of joe public that did something stupid since the infamous 2012 Oxford case on retail loss. BAILIFFS can only ever be involved after you've been to court and lost a CCJ, fat chance re above... and anyway, no BAILIFF has any right of forced entry anyway on consumer debts even with a judgement so......... stop panicking and thinking everything that doesn't apply.. forget about them but p'haps a confidential GP visit might be a very good move... what slightly concerns me more here is:  who are 'them' that told you they'd reviewed a week of CCTV and come up with several shoplifting instances over that time amounting to the above? have you directly contacted or had contact from Sainsbury's? and know they HAVE done this? or is this DWF willy waving and they tricked you into  admitting several previous successful thefts... this is not the norm...  dx      
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Jayneuk v Halifax


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6277 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

Been directed to this site by a friend. Just done my sar letter, but I'm a bit confused about where to send it to. On another site I was looking at it gave an address in Fife, then I saw one somewhere else in Yorkshire, or should I just send to my local branch?

 

Jayne.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya Jayne,

welcome to the forum. The address is

HALIFAX PLC

TRINITY ROAD

HALIFAX

WEST YORKSHIRE

HX1 2RG

HOW TO...DUMMIES GUIDE TO CAG...Read here

STEP BY STEP GUIDE...Read here

F&Q's... Read here

EVERYTHING YOU NEED THE A~Z GUIDE...Read here

 

Go to our Cag Toolbar Download page here

 

Please don't forget this site is run on DONATIONS If this site has helped in any way, then please give a little back. ;-)

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All I know has come from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jayne

Take a few mins to read my thread - jaxads - it'll give you an idea of the timecales in my claim against the Halifax. Good luck!

jaxads

 

Halifax - £2281, successfully refunded all charges after LBA letter & telephone call.

Have been offered the difference between the £20 and £12 charges from Capital One -- am sending LBA for remainder.

GE Money - Received settlement of £441, being total charges requested. No interest though.

CCA'd Bank of Scotland / Blair Oliver Scott to produce CCA Agreements on two Credit Cards - well in default, although still chasing payment!!!

EOS Solutions "ceased action on account" on behalf of a friend.

 

All in all, quite busy at the moment and enjoying every minute of it
:eek:

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just remember to stick to your timescales. You're calling the shots here, not the Halifax!!!!!

jaxads

 

Halifax - £2281, successfully refunded all charges after LBA letter & telephone call.

Have been offered the difference between the £20 and £12 charges from Capital One -- am sending LBA for remainder.

GE Money - Received settlement of £441, being total charges requested. No interest though.

CCA'd Bank of Scotland / Blair Oliver Scott to produce CCA Agreements on two Credit Cards - well in default, although still chasing payment!!!

EOS Solutions "ceased action on account" on behalf of a friend.

 

All in all, quite busy at the moment and enjoying every minute of it
:eek:

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok TideTurner, thank you very much.

 

Does anyone know whether the Halifax tend to send out a list of charges or all the statements? If it's statements there will be a huge amount of pages because one of my accounts has been very active. God knows how I will get through them all and add it all up without missing any.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi - I got a huge bundle of envelopes -- about 50 I think. There were 3 statements per envelope - what a waste!! When you go through the statements with your highlighter, each time you find a charge its brilliant!!!! You may need to sit down at the end of it when you add all the charges up - lol!!! I went through all of mine with a highlighter and then went through again with a different coloured highlighter and I'd actually missed about £200 worth!!! Definitely worth double checking.

Whilst waiting for your statements, its worth taking the time to read through the other threads and learn from them. I find this site so addictive, I cannot keep off it. Don't know who to take on next - tee hee!! Best wishes. jaxads.

jaxads

 

Halifax - £2281, successfully refunded all charges after LBA letter & telephone call.

Have been offered the difference between the £20 and £12 charges from Capital One -- am sending LBA for remainder.

GE Money - Received settlement of £441, being total charges requested. No interest though.

CCA'd Bank of Scotland / Blair Oliver Scott to produce CCA Agreements on two Credit Cards - well in default, although still chasing payment!!!

EOS Solutions "ceased action on account" on behalf of a friend.

 

All in all, quite busy at the moment and enjoying every minute of it
:eek:

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll get my highlighters ready then! To be honest, I don't think it will be a lot, because I don't remember having that many charges, but I'm sure it will be a couple of hundred or so, and definitely worth doing :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I got all mine in 2 envelopes. 1 for each account. I had a lot of fun with my highlighters. he he.

Be prepaid for the wait as they seem to be taking their time sending them out. But use the time to read up as much as you can.

HOW TO...DUMMIES GUIDE TO CAG...Read here

STEP BY STEP GUIDE...Read here

F&Q's... Read here

EVERYTHING YOU NEED THE A~Z GUIDE...Read here

 

Go to our Cag Toolbar Download page here

 

Please don't forget this site is run on DONATIONS If this site has helped in any way, then please give a little back. ;-)

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All I know has come from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

The spreadsheet calculates the 8% from the start. Normally you would print a copy off without that column showing when you make your initial claim, but no harm in leaving it showing - although you cannot claim this until the case reaches court stage, if it does.

 

All claims made for repayment of charges are on the understanding that if the bank offers the full amount then you must take it and are then unable to file a case at court. If you do not reach agreement with the bank, and go to court, the court system allows the 8% to be added, plus repayment of court fees.

 

Some people also put in a claim for the £10 SAR fee, but it's not clear if this is a genuine claim as you have only followed the Data Protection Act rules in requesting your information. It's not an unfair charge by the bank as they did not determine this. Some add it in and get it, others don't.

Be good to those who give you advice that helps - click the star to give them your thanks by way of a reputation credit.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Under the Data Protection Act 1998

Schedule 8 Part 1 (2) provides: -

"eligible manual data" means eligible data which are not eligible automated data;

Banks have been known to deny access to information as it is held in a manual format (in a physical file).

Nobody writes information by hand these days, so if they have a physical file, the documents contained in it will have been created on a PC and are therefore held in a digital or magnetic format.

Regarding the time you have to claim, you have 6 years from the date of discovery of your loss. The Banks will claim otherwise, however, it is now becoming clear that as charges were made, the reason for such charges was concealed from the client.

Limitation Act 1980 S32 (1)(a),(b) and © provides: -

32 Postponement of limitation period in case of fraud, concealment or mistake

(1) Subject to subsections (3) and (4A) below, where in the case of any action for which a period of limitation is prescribed by this Act, either--

(a) the action is based upon the fraud of the defendant; or

(b) any fact relevant to the plaintiff's right of action has been deliberately concealed from him by the defendant;

or

© the action is for relief from the consequences of a mistake; the period of limitation shall not begin to run until the plaintiff has discovered the fraud, concealment or mistake (as the case may be) or could with reasonable diligence have discovered it. References in this subsection to the defendant include references to the defendant’s agent and to any person through whom the defendant claims and his agent.

You may therefore claim for all of your losses – then wait for a defence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guys, get your lips around this post!

 

KAZZAW v Lloyds Asset Card - EVERYONE READ POST 15 !!!!!!

 

General Form of Judgment or Order

 

To the Claimant

 

kazzaw

 

 

Before District Judge ................. sitting at Lincoln County Court.

 

EX PARTE

 

IT IS ORDERED THAT

 

The Court of its own motion is considering striking the Defence out as an abuse of process on the basis that it has settled all previous claims of this nature. If the Defendant objects to this course of action it is to file at Court within 14 days, a Schedule setting out a list of all claims it has pursued to trial and all claims it has settled.

 

Dated 28 December 2006

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh dear, now I'm confused. Will I be claiming for charges over the last six years, or charges in the whole time I have had the accounts? (which in my case is since I was a child, presumably when my card cash account switched to a current account).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jayne

 

The normal course of action has been to claim the previous 6 years, from the time you became aware of the charges being unlawful. This is often taken to be the date of sending your S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) in, just so everyone worked to the same timescales.

 

During the process of reclaiming you are able to add any further charges added to your account, up until the time the case reaches the court stage. All you do is amend your spreadsheet and add a new copy with each letter you sent to the Hx or court. Once a case is lodged at court you have a set figure for the claim, but the 8% interest is added at a daily rate.

 

However, some people have gone back further than 6 years and have managed to claim their charges back. The Hx have seen saying they will defend such actions, but still give in before it reaches a court hearing. They just pay up and send a letter on the lines of it not being comercially viable to defend the case.

 

You're supposed to believe that's because it would cost them a bomb to attand court with their solicitors, but reading between the lines it is because they are unsure of their ground and don't want to risk the court saying they have to pay up. This would open the floodgates for many more cases to be settled without needing a full court hearing as the Judge would be given details of such a case to influence his ruling.

 

The Hx just try and make it as difficult as they can in the hope they'll put you off, although there is always the risk it would go to court if you are doing something 'different' like this. I'm sure there are a few threads about where this is discussed further:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/halifax-bank/51169-missy-halifax-over-6-a.html

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/halifax-bank/41508-over-6-years.html

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/halifax-bank/30737-thurley-halifax.html

- there may be more, that's just from a very quick search.

 

In the end, it's up to you if you want to go further than the 6 years. You have to make sure any communication you send states what your claim is, and quotes the correct legalities I would imagine. Most people have gone for the 6 years and been happy with that from what I've read on here.

Be good to those who give you advice that helps - click the star to give them your thanks by way of a reputation credit.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm don't know what to do. The Thurley thread seems to end rather abruptly and with no conclusion, so I'm thinking maybe it's best to just stick with the 6 years and not get greedy! I will wait to get the statements anyhow, and see what the figures are.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Limidation Date should commence from that date if you can show concealment S32(1)(a)(b).

 

It is also considered to be the date that you first complained to the Bank. I am claiming all of my charges, in the belief I didn't know the charges were unlawful until recently. I am also claiming damages for loss of appreciation on my property, stress and relocation expences.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...