Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • sorry yes im getting confused with another thread im working on. Clerical Medical/Scottish Widows - No Statements sent - FOS Sided with them - SAR'd FOS - they say somethings are not my data - Financial Ombudsman Service - Consumer Action Group you simply need now to ignore them dx    
    • read the above again carefully and respond as directed. its all you will have to do then the situation is almost guaranteed to be rolled back to as if you'd only just received paperwork, regardless to them not receiving your completed NIP. dx
    • Theclaw 123. As you will have realised by the above query from Honeybee, your post contained an important error that totally changed the meaning of what you were saying. It is important that when dealing with legal/government matters, that you check and recheck, what you are writing. I have noticed that errors have appeared in your previous posts, be they typo's or missed words, so I would again urge you to check what you are typing before submitting. When writing something of true import, I find it best to compose in a Word document so as to be able to correct, add or delete as necessary, before 'copy and pasting' into the relevant box/form. I can understand that you are under pressure, stress, due to current personal situations, so it is even more important to pause, take time to check and allow your brain to regather its thoughts when composing important replies; as the person on the other end of the communication is not interested in your personal situation, just what you are writing in relation to the offences disclosed.
    • 1. yes 2.no 3. your call and keep reading up here on like threads you'll soon get the idea. dx  
    • Hi all, I sent a copy of the court bundle to the 2 email addresses provided by JK and followed the instructions to change the hyphenated é to a normal e in the email address. This has worked as I have not received an undeliverable email saying that the email does not exist. As per my previous posts, a copy of the court bundle has also been sent by post to the court and to Evri.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

SueC V Abbey


suecrill
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6199 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

GuidoT,

MN you do not have an entitlement to SI on sums that are refunded prior to the filing of the claim form.
Sorry, but I disagree. The claim remains for 100% of the charges plus (at the N1 stage which Sue is just about the submit) the associated Statutory Interest. Like they do with everyone, they have just tried to buy her off with a GOGW which she should simply deduct from her total claim. If they had said, right, we'll refund the charges between dates X&Y then I'd be tempted to agree with you, but they don't. More fool them. Regards, Mad Nick

Abbey £8370 settled 17 Apr 07

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Morning peeps,

 

The debate is fascinating, but I'm not sure it is providing clear direction and advise for Sue to move her claim forward.

 

Just thought it should be said so we can keep things on track.

 

Regards

 

BB

Any advise offered is my own opinion, and if in doubt, always seek clarification.

[

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bitingback, you are quite right and Sue, I'm very sorry for starting an argument on your thread. I've taken the debate into "General" because I would think there's a standard CAG line to take about what seems to me to be quite a basic issue. Regards, Mad Nick

Abbey £8370 settled 17 Apr 07

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone

Letter from DMRS today, they rang me two days ago asking for repayment of the overdraft. I reiterated that the account was in dispute and they asked why. I told them I was disputing charges and they said oh you are taking it further then, so they obviously knew that I was reclaiming. The letter today says that they are returning the account to abbey and this will result in further action being taken.

They then add in the next paragraph that they are now able to offer a discount to the balance if I am prepared to make a single partial payment!!!!!! I havent heard of this on this website before has anyone else had this offer?

 

Any comments, advice gratefully taken. Should I ring them and ask what the discount is? Ignore them? If I can afford to pay what they ask - do I pay it an then carry on with my claim??

 

Helpppppppppppppppppppppp

 

Thanks everyone

 

PS If anyone on here is going to Truckfest or wants discounted tickets, please PM me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a letter from DRMS as well and i rang them up and told them it was in dispute and that under section 13.6 the abbey were breaking the banking code and as such should not have handed the account over to them until after the dispute was settled, all they said was fine we'll get back in touch if we need anything more, that was the last i heard from them. If they are handing the account back to abbey how can they then offer you a discount?. As far as i can see you have three options

1. Ring them back and state as i did about the banking code and that abbey shouldn't have handed it over to them until the dispute was settled and see what they say. If you don't get anywhere then:-

2. you can make an offer to make repayments.

3. Ignore it.

 

if 2. Make sure you make an offer to pay monthly,and one that you can afford to stick to, this will slowly reduce the balance and leaving you less to pay out of your claim when it's successful.

 

if 3. Ignore it. this is a bit more dangerous, personally i'd go with the first option

 

HTH pmahonc

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sue,

 

You are having an interesting (such a versitile word that) time at the moment. I haven't had any personal experience of DMRS but the suggestions from pmahonc make sence. I would be curios to know how they can offer discounts on an account "in dispute".

 

I await the next installment.

 

Cheers

 

BB

Any advise offered is my own opinion, and if in doubt, always seek clarification.

[

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sue,

 

I presume you both have access and cheque writing rights to the account individually, so the claim can be in your name. Not sure if you need to specify if it is a joint account but shouldn't think so.

 

I am sure one of the wiser hrads here will confirm or deny.

 

Cheers

 

BB

Any advise offered is my own opinion, and if in doubt, always seek clarification.

[

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sue,

 

I presume you both have access and cheque writing rights to the account individually, so the claim can be in your name. Not sure if you need to specify if it is a joint account but shouldn't think so.

 

I am sure one of the wiser hrads here will confirm or deny.

 

Cheers

 

BB

 

 

Hope not or else I've made a pig's ear of mine.

All advice offered here is my opinion only based on what I would do in a given situation. If you wish to act on it you do so at your own discretion

......................................................

I have no legal expertise or qualification, and give advice on the basis of my own experience and nothing else.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I must admit that I only just thought of it as I was about to stuff the envelope - have reprinted in joint names with both of us signing - i hope thats ok coz am running out of print cartridge (must have printed at least 20 copies all incorrectly - lol)

All the letters were sent and signed by both of us and all replies were to us both

anyway i think i will let it go with both of us as claimants

regards

Sue

Link to post
Share on other sites

BB

got another letter from DMRS this morning FINAL NOTICE !!!! I have just rung them and they say account already sent back to Abbey - I questioned the fact that Abbey had sent it to them and they agreed Abbey shouldnt have referred it whilst in dispute. They also advised that if i was to pay off the balance they would be looking for approx 80% The lady at DMRS and I had a little light banter and then she advised I contacted Abbey complaints and complain that it had been sent to DMRS

Oh well - we lead such "interesting" lives - lol

sue

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another one Sue,

 

I thought you had told them it was disputed and that they were returning it to Shabbey.

 

I hope you had an "open and frank exchange of views" with the complaints dept. Like you need this on top of your normal working day.

 

Glad to see you smiling about it though ;) .

 

Looks like you are fine on the court papers as well, so I await the next installment.

 

Regards

 

BB

Any advise offered is my own opinion, and if in doubt, always seek clarification.

[

Link to post
Share on other sites

bb

you should read my post on the insurance forum - is sorted now but was very "interesting" However I won with the wonderful help on here particularly from reidnet, mooreda, nightmareforbanks to name but a few

hope your day was good

sue

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Karnevil

I must admit it felt good when the court papers arrived saturday morning. Have you heard of any other claims in the Peterborough Court and what the judges are like there?

Oh by the way I gave you the wrong thread title for the litigation section - sorry

Abbey deemed served today, defence to be in by 14th April. I imagine I will have a long wait.

I have also sent my prelim letter to Alliance & Leicester (faxed on Friday) sent special delivery today.

Regards

Sue

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi all - just a quick note- received leter yesterday - Abbey defending

They have also put my overdraft in default since filing court action. It was on 4 and suddenly gone to status 8 on experian this week!!

 

Regards

Sue

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Morning everyone

Had another lovely phone call from DMRS yesterday afternoon. A very pleasant young lady asked me to pay the outstanding balance in full by visa, delta, maestro or switch! I apologised profusely :rolleyes: and declined her kind offer. Well, she said, I could accept the full balance in two payments mrs c . Oh bless your heart, I said, how kind of you but no thank you.

I asked her if she realised that the debt is in dispute and that it wasnt really a good idea for her to chase it and i then suggested that she return it to abbey.

She said I should write and advise DMRS that the debt is in dispute to which I declined politely and advised her of the court action and gave her the case number. I advised her that I would be contacting abbey complaints once again.

Poor girl, couldnt keep the laughter out of voice.

 

Anyway, my reason for posting, any advice on who i should contact and what little gem of narrative should I treat them to

Regards and thanks

Sue

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sue, you need to write to Abbey copying in DMRS and give them a short requaintance of the Banking Code. I cant look it up at the moment, but if you do a site search you will find some letters and threads about it, if not, when I get back, i will look them up for you .

 

In your POC did you mention the removal of any defaults? In any case they are not allowed to default you or trash your credit rating whilst the account is in dispute.

 

More later

 

 

Lula

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi Lulu

Thanks ever so much for your reply. I am afraid I didnt mention the default removal in my POC - I did in my prelim and LBA - but regretfully I decided not to complicate the claim by putting it on the N1 - wish I had really -

Thanks for your help will have a search around see what I can find ref the banking code etc.

 

regards

sue

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sue,

 

Just had a read seems you are wellserved with Lulu's advice, re the dafoults, it may be possible to amment the POC but not sure if it would be the best course of action.

 

There is a form to ammend the claim, in the templated folder, Form N244 Application Notice. It costs £35.00 no reclaimable, abut it should allow you to chande the POC.

 

Have a read and let me know your thoughts.

 

Regards

 

BB

Any advise offered is my own opinion, and if in doubt, always seek clarification.

[

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...