Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Everyone knows the tories were hiding the costs - and even added 4 billion quid to the taxpayers high interest credit card to fund a chunk of the NI tax reduction - prime example - look at how much cost was hidden re the Rwanda dogwhistle -10 Billion quid     and re the handful of rebels on the benefit limit If the disasters (like the Rwanda rubbish) of Tory dogs being wagged by the extremist minority ERG tail doesn't highlight the issues .. Enlighten yourself here .. (fat chance) Sir Keir Starmer is right to show Labour rebels the door WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Editorial: Suspending seven MPs following their rebellion over the two-child benefit cap is more than a prime minister flexing his political muscle. It is a...  
    • Trump instigated that didnt he @theoldrouge despite losing the election - and Biden mitigated as much as he could within his boundaries?   "President Donald Trump ordered a rapid withdrawal of all U.S. troops from Afghanistan and Somalia in the wake of his 2020 election loss"   “The order was for an immediate withdrawal, and it would have been catastrophic,” said Rep. Adam Kinzinger, R-Ill., one of two Republican members of the special panel. “And yet President Trump signed the order.”   Trump ordered rapid withdrawal from Afghanistan after election loss WWW.MILITARYTIMES.COM The memo was among the latest revelations from the congressional committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol building.   Although i agree that Biden should have done more to mitigate Trump driven disasters
    • ok your WS is wrong. Paragraph 16 and 17 says  you did not contract with evri but this is not true - see below  Furthermore to the eBay Powered By Packlink T&Cs that Evri is referring to, Clauses 3b and c of the T&Cs states:  (b)   Packlink is a package dispatch search engine that acts as an intermediary between its Users and Transport Agencies. Through the Website, Users can check the prices that different Transport Agencies offer for shipments and contract with the Transport Agency that best suits their needs on-line. (c)  Each User shall then enter into its own contract with the chosen Transport Agency. Packlink does not have any control over, and disclaims all liability that may arise in contracts between a User and a Transport Agency post 251 of occy thread - £844 lost    you should also add a paragraph on donough v Stevenson talking about the fact that even without contract there is still duty of care to goods and by failing to deliver this duty has been breached.   Make those changes and post it back up here and I'll check over things again
    • no we cant add the occy thing because leicster are being difficult people so we're just going to go without it for now
    • no you can email it dont worry about that. take out the index of statement of truth, just not needed
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Affinity water forcing meter charges


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 199 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone and happy new year!

I received a letter from Affinity Water telling me that they had fitted a water meter outside my property (I didn't even know about this) and from next summer they will start charging me accordingly to the meter.

At the moment I am paying fixed rate and accordingly to their calculations my water bill will go up 400% from £350 to £1400 approx.

I remember reading somewhere that they can install meters to understand what the water demand is in their areas, but they can't force you to be billed by the meter if you don't want to. 

Now I can't find any info about this, apart from the usual Facebook "freemen of the land" advising not to pay any bills whatsoever 🙄

Do you have any info about this please?

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Happy New Year to you also,

This may be of interest...

WWW.TELEGRAPH.CO.UK

In some areas meters are now mandatory, and won't necessarily make bills cheaper

Strangely, in the body of the article, Affinity appear to be rolling out compulsory metering, but in the table at the bottom of the article, it says they are not making meters compulsory... Go figure.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

Happened to me and I wasn't even told, first I knew was when a bill arrived quoting a meter reading, I went outside to check and where the property stop cock was in the street a meter had been installed.

I was not happy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks @Nicky Boy.

I read the article but doesn't explain whethere the compulsory fitting means compulsory billing.

My question is: given that legislations must be adhered by the letter, saying that water companies can impose fitting of water meters, doesn't mean that they can impose billing by meters.

Otherwise the legislator would've used the words "charging by meter".

Did the legislator make a mistake or this is one of the times where a company can interpret the law in their favour?

In other words, does the legislation give them power to charge me by meter even if it's not explicitly mentioned?

Please note, I'm assuming there's no mention of charging by meter in law and would be great if anyone could point out which legislation applies here.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Water meters are permitted to be fitted by companies in designated areas of water stress regardless of whether one is wanted and Affinity Water is in such an area as is the one I work for (not Affinity).

The part regarding charging by water meter would be covered by s.143 of The Water Industry Act which allows water companies to make a ‘Charges Scheme” in which it would be detailed the provision to charge if you a water meter fitted.

It is fairest way as people pay for what they use just like electric and gas.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In inner London where I live Thames Water installed meters to the whole street over 10 years ago but they didn't try to move us on to water meter charging.

They didn't tell us they were putting the meters in but as they were in the public pavement not on my property I couldn't see any reason why they needed to tell us or get our agreement.

I got regular emails and mailshots from.them inviting me to voluntarily switch to paying by meter which I ignored.

Then last year everyone who still wasn't paying by meter got a formal notice that TW was compulsorily moving everyone to metered supply.

TW stated they were entitled to do this because they had declared London a water stress area or something like that and this entitled them to impose metering. I don't have the exact details handy at the moment but probably the law kjun quotes. They also said it was approved  by OFWAT.

That's probably what Affinity are doing to you. Have you asked them the legal basis they are using?

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...