Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Amazon parcel delivery driver let dogs out- 1 then killed on road


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 239 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This is still a very raw subject for me so I apologise if I'm not perfectly clear.

On Wednesday last week, an Amazon delivery driver opened the back door of my property and allowed my two dogs to escape. One ran on to the busy road and was hit and killed instantly.

I've contacted Amazon and they've put me on to their claims company, ARC. I'm in the middle of dealing with them, and I've passed on the details of the car driver to them with regards to paying for the damage to her car. I've also asked for them to pay for the cost of my beloved dog's cremation.

I guess I just wanted to check that, legally, I'm in the right? We have our letterbox taped shut and a sign on the gate stating to leave parcels in the shed. I had also put on my Amazon delivery notes not to open our door as there are dogs on the property (which I did in case someone came in to the house and my dog bit them, never considered this would happen). My husband was at home at the time of the incident and witnessed the courier opening the door.

Link to post
Share on other sites

was this amazon? or a courier company?

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

then they are your target or both, as joint defendants named in any subsequent court cases/claims

on an amazon order you get an email/contact from the courier, on their site did you fill in their part regarding to leave parcels outside and not to open the door?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Amazon parcel delivery driver let dogs out- i then killed on road

The picture you have created in your post is not entirely clear.

You take to letterbox shut. Presumably that is within the front garden?
You instructed them to leave items in the shed – presumably that is in a back garden?
They opened the door – which door? Is this a door to the front garden? The back garden? The house? If it was a door to the house then was it a front door or a back door?

Please can you clarify

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, as I said I'm still in shock at it all.

 

The gate is to my front garden where delivery drivers usually stop (leads straight on to a busy A road),

the sign directs them to go round the back of the property for access.

The back of my property has the back door with letterbox, box beside the door for mail and the garage/shed is right beside my back door.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry but I still don't get it.

What I'm starting to understand that is that this all happened at the back of your property.
The back of the property has a letterbox which is on the outside so there is no need to enter into the garden in order to put things through the letterbox.
However the letterbox was taped shut.
This means that the only way to deliver things to your property is by going into your back garden and that is where the shed is.
So the delivery agent went to the back of your property has directed. Entered the back garden to put the item into the shed and as they did so, the dogs escaped because they were in the back garden.
Is this correct?

If it's not then I think you better start drawing a diagram
 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, not at all.

 

I possibly should have started by stating I live on a farm.

 

The back of my property is the farm yard with a farm track leading to it off of the road.

My dogs were inside the house.

My back door also has a letterbox which, as mentioned, is taped shut.

The delivery driver opened the door and the dogs escaped. 

There was no need to open the door at all and it really escapes me why she would when she could hear my dogs going bananas on the other side.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it certainly helps a little bit now that you have disclosed that you live on a farm.

You keep on referring to the "back door". I asked you a on whether this is the back door to your house and you haven't addressed this. I'm getting the impression that the driver open the door to your house and entered your house. Could this be correct?

Link to post
Share on other sites

None of it has been very clear and we have had to tease the details out of you.

Was there any written warning or sign about the presence of the dogs?

Have you made a written complaint to Amazon or to their insurer? Please will you post it here in PDF format.
Have you had any written response? Please could you post it here in PDF format

Please can you tell us about the dogs. Are they special of some kind? You have talked only about the cost of cremation. Are there any other losses that you consider that you have incurred.

It seems to me that the delivery driver trespassed on your property and this will be the basis of your claim.

I would suggest that at the moment you don't allow yourself simply to be controlled by Amazon or by the insurer. You can be certain that their insurer will simply do their best to restrict their losses or even deny them altogether.

You better try and layout everything – and it would be helpful if you could do it at one go rather than take 24 hours please.

Link to post
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, dx100uk said:

then they are your target or both, as joint defendants named in any subsequent court cases/claims

on an amazon order you get an email/contact from the courier, on their site did you fill in their part regarding to leave parcels outside and not to open the door?

Also I see that my site team colleague asked you the question which I have quoted above. You don't seem to have addressed this either.

Please can you give us all of this information. It will be helpful to us and eventually it will be helpful to you if we know the answers

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll try to be as detailed as possible!  

On Wednesday, my husband was at home in the middle of lighting the fire when he heard our dogs start to bark which usually means either the farmer is going about on his tractor or someone else has came near the back door.

When he went to check, there was a delivery driver standing in the doorway and the dogs were nowhere to be seen.

The delivery driver said she had a parcel and when my husband asked where the dogs were she replied "oh they ran off" and then asked him to sign for the parcel.

My husband grabbed the leads from the back door as the delivery driver got in her van and drove off.

My dogs were running riot around the yard, my husband went to open the boot of the pickup truck as they always make a beeline for it 

in that space of time Ethel ran on to the road where she was hit and killed outright. The lady who hit her stopped and called the police who attended within minutes.

I ordered the items on Amazon and it was sold by and despatched by Amazon.

On the day of delivery I received an email from Amazon stating it was due to be delivered and asking if there were any delivery instructions.

I checked that my usual instructions were showing, which they were (have attached screenshots in PDF format).

There was no indication it was a third party delivery company and, indeed, is still showing as delivered by Amazon on my account (screenshot attached)

I contacted Amazon via live chat (I'm thinking this wasn't the best option?) Was told it would be passed on to relevant department and then received the attached email from their insurers.

I filled in the form which was a generic one for damage to a vehicle and also replied to the email saying that I wanted to claim for cost of cremation and also cost of my dog. She was a 3 year old boerboel who cost us £1200.

I forwarded them the vet invoice for the cremation and also the receipt for amount paid for my dog.

I gave them the details of the lady who hit our dog (with her permission) so they could contact her with regards to repairs to her car.

The sign on our front gate states "dogs on property. Do not open gate. Please leave parcels in shed at back door" and also on our delivery instructions with Amazon it states there are dogs and not to open the doors.

This was more to protect the delivery drivers as Ethel the boerboel was very territorial and I also own a year old dogue de Bordeaux.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. That's helpful.

Please will you monitor this thread for reply later on this afternoon – or maybe tomorrow.

In the meantime, please could you combine the PDF files that you have posted above into a single PDF file, in order, the right way round et cetera.

We are looking for a multipage single file PDF format. Not a bunch of individual files with no indication in the filename as to what each one might contain.
Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. That all seems to be fairly clear.

In my view there is a trespass here. I suppose it is also a breach of contract. In addition to actual losses in respect of a trespass you could claim for an additional sum for the trespass. Trespassed the property basically implies an insult to your status as the ownership of property and this would normally be addressed by a payment of damages.

I would suggest that in the event you consider adding an additional £200 for the trespass in addition to your actual losses which is the price of the dog, cremation – and any additional expenses.

Of course they will balk at the idea of the damages for trespass but they would try to reduce whatever figure you came up with and so adding an extra 200 quid for trespass gives you some wiggle room so that you can pull back if you want and they will feel that they have saved some Face by beating you down to hundred pounds.

It's a shame that you use their standard form to make your complaint. This was not the best idea. You should have made a complaint in writing.

I suggest that you make a complaint in writing now.

Have you got a copy of the form that you filled in online? Please post it here

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well as you clearly realise, it was not the best idea to fill in a form and then not keep any record of what you said.
You will have to write to the insurer and ask them for a copy of it.
You can be certain that it will probably not be forthcoming very easily.

It's probably about time you started protecting yourself rather than following instructions from others who don't have your best interests at heart.

As you have already started procedure, then send it to both parties. Make it clear that they have each got copies of it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm really kicking myself for even filling in the form in the first place, never mind not making a copy. To be honest, today is the first day since it happened that I'm feeling even close to normal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Amazon parcel delivery driver let dogs out- 1 then killed on road
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...