Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Not sure how to proceed after hit and run accident in private car park.


abc246
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 300 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone, 

On monday someone hit my car whilst trying to park, causing a decent amount of damage on the bumper. Naturally I contacted the police and the people who managed the cctv for the site.

There was blatant footage apparently of an individual hitting my car multiple times, and even getting out to check before driving off. Now the issue is because it happened in a private car park, not accessible to the public, the police can't prosecute. 

The security company have a copy of the footage as do the police, I think. I'd rather not go through insurance as I dont want my premium increasing anymore, even if it is a non-fault claim, and the damage is purely cosmetic.

 

Because of GDPR, I'm unable to get any copies of the footage, and therefore have no idea who hit my car so cant contact them (I was not in the footage, my car was parked empty)

. Is there anyway I can make a small claim for the damaged caused to my car, and use a court proceeding to obtain the footage.

I honestly have no idea how to go about this, it's a bizarre situation.

Thanks in advance everyone

P.s, im not sure this is the right place to post this so if it isn't, many apologies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Not sure how to proceed after hit and run accident in private car park.

Thanks for both of your replies

1)a security company who manages the cctv for the site has copies which they’ve said they’ve saved. West Yorkshire police also have a copy, the security company sent it to them before the investigation was shut

2) I contacted both the police and the security company, via calling them. Both responses were because I’m not in the actual footage they can’t give it to me, because of GDPR and data protection. 
 

3) I did ask whether the footage actually shows anything, to both parties. The security company did tell me exactly what the person did and that they are identifiable, but that’s it. The police didn’t give me anything. 
 

4) The police and security company actually both told me they can’t give anything because of GDPR. But I actually also contacted the information commissioners office and they also said it would be difficult to get the footage because I’m not actually in it.

 

Ethel street the issue with the link you sent is that it is solely dependant on getting the registration plate of the vehicle you want, which I can’t get because no one will give it to me

Edited by abc246
Adding extra reply
Link to post
Share on other sites

In response to Ethel street, yes im sure because the security company who’ve seen the footage 100% confirmed this and said the plate is clearly visible. 
 

In response to bankfodder I asked a lawyer who said the same thing the police said

ive also posted what I think it’s a relevant link, it’s what I first looked at

WWW.SLATERGORDON.CO.UK

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all for the replies. There is something I did forget to mention and I am sorry. In response to unclebulgaria, the land is actually not accessible to members of the public. It's a private apartment building with underground parking that is only accessible by a fob that opens a shutter. This was mentioned by the officer I spoke to on the phone; the fact that it was not really accessible to the public and only accessible to tenants of the apartment block seemed to be the dealbreaker. Again sorry for not mentioning this, it is incredibly relevant. Regardless though, criminal damage is still criminal damage surely?

You raise a brilliant point that I didnt think of, regarding my number plate being visible and therefore me being identifiable. 

In response to you bankfodder, I didnt pay a penny im clued in enough to not to do that this soon. I wouldn't even be able to tell you their name, just some generic motor lawyer I googled. 

Compelling evidence is an understatement apparently, it was about as black and white as a zebra

I know it was hit multiple times because that's what the security guy who saw the footage said, im basing it off of his word in essence. 

I'm using the telephone simply because it ensures I'm not fobbed off, they pick up and they speak and I give them what for. As opposed to sending emails and getting ignored or short responses. Also the police don't actually have an email I'm aware of so I have just been using 101.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then in that case ill get to drafting a letter

I will post the letter here before I send it, in case I make any errors.

In essence I'm asking the police to investigate this matter, as it falls under the criminal damage act, and as such the laws of data protection are not applicable. Therefore I would like them to re-open their investigation, provide me with a crime reference number, and also provide me with the cctv footage that they have.

Thank you very much everyone who has commented thus far, you are very kind.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lot of messages, thank you all, I'll try work through them one by one. 

Bankfodder, so I have taken pictures yes, at the time if the accident. If needed im happy to post these. In terms of costs, it's up in the air. Eyeballing I would say between £200-£500. Depends a lot on if the parking sensors on the front have been damaged. They seem fine but who knows

Nickyboy, I'll post a pic of the signage below. They do say something but its a separate one off sign, you will see. The official looking one is all over the car park. 

theberengersniper, you are absolutely right, 99% chance the one who's guilty lives in the flat. They are numbered spots but not assigned. I have a spot I park in but not because it was assigned, just because I like the location of it, it's convenient.

They wouldn't give me anything anyway even if it was relevant, gdpr would probably apply.

I have reposted the letter, hopefully it's ok now. In terms of where its getting posted, should it just be the nearest police station to the location of the crime?

 

To the chief inspector.docx IMG_8128.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Further to some suggestions on here too, I contacted the ICO and the idea that my reg is in the footage therefore I am eligible to acquire it didn't really float with them. I was told it would be incredibly difficult. 

In terms of GDPR exemptions, insurance was one, as was the police, and finally a court order.

I also made the reluctant decision to notify my insurance company. They said they've requested the footage from the security company and the police, but also said it may be several weeks before they get anything, if ever. However the 'claim' is currently on hold, so I am not liable for my own excess, and at any point I can cancel and retain all my bonuses thankfully. If the doing it myself route does not work for whatever reason I thought it prudent to have a fallback.

Regardless though, I don't believe they should get away with this, even if I go down the insurance route. I will most definitely want to pursue damages from this scummy individual.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh yes sorry I completely forgot to put in the details of that, I was probably being over cautious in redacting personal info.

I have been keeping a eye on cars coming in for any suspicious ones

I'll play a waiting game for now and ill come back once I know more, in the meantime I will post this the letter to the police  

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone, hope you're all well

Just a quick update, letters posted so just waiting on that now, however direct line have finally got the footage and everything they need to proceed the claim, they're looking to claim everything back and the man I spoke to said they don't have a leg to stand on to be honest.

He also told me the make and model of the car that hit me, minus the reg, but I am now 99% sure I know which car it is. How should I proceed? Should I leave a letter on the dashboard, e.g. a letter of intent? Or should I get the details of the driver from DVLA, as I'm pretty sure they'll give them to me if I make a request and say they fled the scene of an accident, which is true

Thanks again all!

Link to post
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Nicky Boy said:

Is there damage visible on the car in question?

(Just to be sure of that last 1%)

Yes there is, I was already suspicious of that car now I know for sure 

a lot of cars have some damage on them in the car park hence the 99% and not 100

Edited by abc246
Clarity
Link to post
Share on other sites

I’ll send them an sar now.

In terms of proceeding, what I meant was if the police don’t plan on pursuing this as a criminal act, I would very much want to take matters in my own hands and pursue justice that way, maybe via a small claims or county court route

You may disagree with me or say I don’t have a case etc, but I don’t have a large income, and this has caused me untold levels of anxiety and stress, and I don’t think people like this person should get away with just a slightly higher premium and maybe some no claims years knocked off and that’s it. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...