Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HMRC seek repayment - another FTR fraud with EIS


BradX
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 183 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I received a letter today from HMRC saying they don’t accept my appeal, even though I didn’t receive all the money I still allowed the company to do it.

 

The last email I received from HMRC was that the self assessment account had been closed and a no payment trigger set.

 

I asked for a SAR twice which I never received,

 

I have 30 days to appeal the decision either with another member of HMRC or go to tribunal.

 

Can anyone advise on what I should do next?

 

thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi, mines being appealed and is with someone at HMRC who wasn’t involved in the case. They said i should hear back by the end of this month. I requested certificates etc for the eis scheme they paid out on. I’ll let you know when they get back to me. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Brad,

 

Are you chasing the police to get them more involved. This could be vital in getting HMRC to take better notice of this EIS scam.

 

Please read the threads of Dixon and Schipoo as they've been active and show good examples of dealing with HMRC.

 

 

 

 

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi brad,

 

Further to our exchange on the general thread, please give a more detailed update about what contact you've had with HMRC and tell us if it's their Legal Team, or others.

 

Thanks

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I had a response saying basically I owed the full amount although I’m saying it was a scam I still give all my details for them to do this so the full debt is for me to pay.

 

I could appeal it through another HMRC agent who isn’t involved in the case and can go to tribunal if I wish. I replied asking for the DSAR which I’d requested months ago and asked for another HMRC agent to look over it.

 

Since then I’ve had the DSAR posted (4 months after I requested it) and a letter off the agent who is now looking into it. It states I will have an update at the end of this month. I’ve also asked for certificates that was used for this EIS scheme as I’m presuming there was nothing provided for this payment to be made.

 

The feedback I got from the letter before I appealed it was, it’s my fault for giving the information out so wasn’t very helpful or reassuring to be honest. They basically said I should of rang and checked that what they was doing was correct to which my response was I had no reason to believe it wasn’t correct.

 

The only reason I knew I had been scammed was when I received the letter from HMRC. I’m waiting for another letter which will no doubt be the same response saying the full debt will be for me to pay 😒

Edited by slick132
Please use paragraph spacing - makes posts easier to read
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Brad,

 

I've added spacing to your post above - big blocks of text are far harder to read.

 

You need to lodge a formal appeal against the tax assessments - there are examples of this on the threads of Dixon and Schipoo. Use these to prepare the appeals and post here as a draft first, for us to check over.

 

Also follow the same advice as on those threads- visit the police to report the event as a crime and give them all the info you have about FTR and the eople involved.

 

Don't let the police just fob you off. 

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Hi,

 

I’ve received an email today, HMRC have tried to get my case struck out. The tribunal have requested a hearing via video link. Any advice to help me with this?

 

 

 

HMRC have applied to have your appeal struck out, copy enclosed, on the basis, they argue that the grounds of appeal which you have raised are not matters which the Tribunal can consider and that you have no reasonable prospect of success.

 

We will therefore arrange a hearing before a judge to consider HMRC’s application to strike out the appeal and your response.  We expect to conduct the hearing by video, or if that is not possible we will arrange a face to face hearing in the Tribunal Centre in Manchester.  Information about video hearings and a short demonstration hearing can be viewed via: https://www.gov.uk/tax-tribunal/if-you-have-a-hearing 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Brad,

 

Yes, always post on your own thread - we'll see your post and it avoids hijacking other threads.

 

You have good examples of HMRC seeking to have tax appeals Struck Out on Schipoo's and Dixon's threads. They include content and format.

 

You need to go through each thread carefully and adapt what you find to properly reflect your own case and circumstances.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

apologies, i thoughts I’d gone onto mine. Sorry.

 

I’ll have a look through them all and get something together, is it a good sign that they haven’t just struck it out? Or is this normal procedure?

 

thank you 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No Probs Brad,

 

HMRC have to apply for the Strike Out - they can't apply one themselves. It will be considered by the First Tier Tribunal of the Courts Service.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Brad, I assume you received this communication from the Court Service but please confirm exactly.

 

You said earlier, " HMRC have applied to have your appeal struck out, copy enclosed, " - Can you please let us see the copy of HMRC's Application.

 

I'm not sure yet if a written submission is best, as opposed to a video hearing, or a face to face hearing. 

 

We first need to see what you've received ...........

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Brad,

 

Go through the submissions made by Dixon and Schipoo. Tailor your submission to the court to reflect your own case and the points that HMRC have made against your appeal.

 

Stick to the deadline to submit to the court and to HMRC.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Slick,

 

can I use the example from schipoos  case?

 

11. I draw attention to 2 other Tribunal case rulings made in April 2022 regarding the same type of fraudulently claimed EIS relief.

12. McCumiskey v HMRC (12th April 2022) in which the Appellant’s appeal against discovery assessments was allowed. The Ruling noted it was unlikely the Appellant was in a position to make large investments in an EIS scheme, given his modest income.

 

13. Huntley V HMRC allowed the Applicant’s late appeal against discovery assessments, allowing him to join group litigation action with 9 other Appellants. This group action concerns fraudulent EIS claims made in circumstances very similar to my own, where little regard was made by HMRC as to the taxpayer’s ability to invest large sums in risky EIS schemes.

 

14. I am grateful to Judge Vos for his comments in para. 12 of his Ruling on 22nd April. If this Application is successful I have already spoken to the tax advisory firm acting for Huntley and others to see if I may join the group litigation.

 

15. I am grateful to the FTT for considering this Application.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, 

 

Thank you, I’ve re-wrote it all to my case. It was just that example. I think the para 14 confused me as I didn’t know if it was about the case above or specific to schipoo’s.

 

Thank you 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you'd read Schipoo's thread, a PDF was posted on 24th May - it was the FTT's decision dated 22/4/22 to Strike Out Schipoo's appeal and included the comments of Judge Vos.

 

After Schipoo lodged an objection, HMRC agreed to NOT object to the appeal being re-instated.

  • Thanks 1

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

Hi, I received an email last week from the tax appeals office who copied HMRC into the email (HMRC weren’t copying me into any emails asking for extensions) the tax appeals copied me in and also added this case to their reply to HMRC stating mine was very similar and the ruling was against HMRC. They did say it could be appealed but as it stands this is the ruling. I took that as a positive?

 

apologies if this is the wrong thread I get mixed up with them but thought it might be useful. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Brad,

 

Please keep a note of this thread (yours) and don't post on others. 

 

I've just spent ages moving your posts back here after accidentally merging them with Schipoo's thread.

 

Can you please expalin exactly what you've received from HMCTS about your case. Or post a copy of the letter as a PDF but with personal info hidden.

 

Thanks

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Hi BradX,

We now know others (Schipoo and Rob Carr) are affected by HMRC successful challengethe to the Group Action being run by Independent Tax. A judge has ruled the cases must be heard at the appeal tribunals separately.

If your case has been resolved successfully, can you please supply details so we can assist others whose cases are ongoing.

Thanks 😎

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...