Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • i hark you back to two years ago. as these debts are still with the original creditors 'm not really to sure why you are still worrying about these debts. not alot anyone can do, even if in 2-3yrs on , they do get sold   to dca's. dx  
    • Please see the link for redacted trial bundle (too large to upload on here) HEARING BUNDLE - redacted-compressed.pdf JMP.SH Shared with Jumpshare  
    • Hi dx, the only secured debt we have is the mortgage on our property and that is a joint mortgage.  all payments are up to date with a clean credit file albeit with a of debt so no missed payments etc sorry what is f&fs? If I am made redundant I am not wasting it on paying all this unsecured debt down and leaving my family broke. This is the dilemma I am currently in. i am not sure I can mentally keep living the way I am I am weighing up how to deal with it without leading to needless ccj threats etc… not sure what direction I am to go in. Hi uncle, okay but 3-6 years of a bank owning my debt means our files are destroyed for longer than 10 years based on that ? Not sure this works out for us that way? Unless I am misunderstanding you
    • How are you funding the privately run supported living housing in the new city ?  Why are you moving? Have you served in armed forces previously? If you are registered with the existing Council as disabled or have other needs they assist with, then depending on the reasons for needing to move, your current Council may help with costs of moving. But you would have to submit an application to them. So you are best to speak to your current council about the help you are seeking.  It is not about a Council being responsible as I don't think there are specific laws saying a Council has to help with costs of transportation. And in regard to Housing costs in new city, as this is going to be private, I don't think the Council will pay under Housing Benefits. You might have to claim Universal Credit, but UC might not cover the full cost as Housing is limited to Local Housing Allowance. Citizens Advice are generally worth contacting about complex Housing issues.
    • I was really hoping these were the kind of comments I was going to get as I’ve never felt so low on my life..
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot/Mortimer chasing - old Progressive credit/then newday then Opus Credit Card debt.


Roo67
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 485 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good Afternoon :)

 

I have received a letter from Mortimer Clarke Solicitors acting on behalf of Cabot Financial for an alleged Opus Credit Card debt. 

 

I sent a CCA request (as on the forum) on 6 Jan 22, and the documents arrived (incomplete) on 29/12/22 - date of letter 14/12/22 nearly 11 months later.... apologizing for the delay!!!!. I am right in thinking they have 30 days to respond? I received an additional letter dated 29/12/22 arriving on 3 Jan 23, stating I had not responded to their request for income and expenditure... and I have 10 days to respond and they will refer to their client for further instructions ..

 

The last payment to the account was made to the account in July 17, with no further payments made. I am unsure if I received a letter before claim... apologises as I have other accounts  however; I note they deducted the £1 postal order I enclosed for the CCA request towards the alleged debt.. which I understand should not happen.

 

I have two other accounts been chased by Mortimer Clarke Solicitors, with Halifax of which I have received a LBC now which I am receiving assistance with which I am grateful thank you. All of the accounts receiving last payment in July 17. I have not moved house since this date.

 

Grateful for any advice how I respond to this letter, in absence of recalling if I received a LBC for this particular account.

 

Many thanks in advance.

 

Roo

Link to post
Share on other sites

why do you feel that what they returned was incomplete ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy 

 

Thank you for your speedy response.

 

Since my last post and sorting out paperwork, I did receive a LBC for this account.

 

My letter was the response to that correspondence. I requested a copy of the CCA and the DOA - there is no copy of the CCA enclosed and the DOA is just a letter?

 

Am I right in assuming it needs two signatures?

 

In addition, they only provided 5 months of statements?

 

Unsure if I am barking up the wrong tree?

 

I thought they have a timescale of 30 days to reply?

 

Grateful for any advice.

 

Given the short time scale should I reply by email or post (1st class signed for? Mindful back log of Royal Mail)

 

Their letter was dated 29 Jan 22, received 3 Jan 23.

 

Unsure when to count the ten days from - given they 'may' follow given up statue bared Aug 23?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Cabot/Mortimer chasing - Opus Credit Card debt.

there is no 30 days

that went out the windows in 2006.

 

can you scan up what they have sent in reply to your CCA request please?

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

DOA (Deed of Assignment) you mean a NOA (Notice of Assignment) you can't have sight of the DOA as it contains private financial details of the purchase and it's not relevant to your agreement as you are not party to the purchase...you are entitled to see the Notice of Assignment as you are party to the agreement and must be served with the notice to make the assignment valid.

 

Scan redact and upload copies of what they have disclosed. 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

I thought they have a timescale of 30 days to reply?

 

Correct with regards to the PAP not a CCA request....if they can't comply fully to a section 78 request within the 12 + 2 days statutory period they can't enforce so in effect they can take as  long as they wish or never. 

 

 

 

.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

read our upload guide carefully

it tells you what to do use and how to do.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

we need the agreement

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

D

I requested the agreement it was not supplied, and enclosed £1 postal order, which they deducted off the alleged balance.  Requested 6 Jan 22 and received what I uploaded on 29 Dec 22.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Cabot/Mortimer chasing - old Progressive credit/then newday then Opus Credit Card debt.

so all you got was a NOA?

looking at the letter

this is a VERY old Progressive Finance Card, which was then passed to newday, which was then passed to Opus....

 

to me if i remember correctly , you agreement/ take out date will be welll into the very early 2000's or ever 1990's??

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

D,

 

All I got was the NOA assignment, five statements and the default notice, and a statement of account. 

 

2006 I think orginally Citibank if I recall. I did request the agreement however; nothing in what they sent.

 

R x

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

when was the last time you used or paid the card?

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

17th july last year?

or july 2017?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it would have been an old Citicard originally 
Cabot don’t have any chance of getting an original agreement and t and cs
and as a reply to a s78 request it’s a total failure 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So sb is very close

hence chasing you.

 

Ignore them.

yours is not the next move.

 

fat chance they will ever get a compliant cca for a citi card.

 

Read a few citi threads here.

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Following on from my post - I received a second LBC from Mortimer Clarke Solicitors dated 16 Jan and received on 19 Jan 23. 

 

As previously posted MCS sent a LBC in Dec 21 and I responded within the timescale and received NOA (uploaded above) assignment, five statements and the default notice, and a statement of account. No CCA or terms and conditions.

 

As they didn't  comply fully to a section 78 request within the 12 + 2 days statutory period - (took them 11 months to send info). Do I need to reply to the second LBC? 

 

Many thanks in advance.

 

Roo 

Link to post
Share on other sites

reply as before 

dont request docs you already have 

 

because the claimant has failed to previously comply with my CCA request sent date xxxx

send a new CCA

staple it to the reply form.... letter of claim thread post 2 refers.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...