Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • it's 85k of turnover (well, now £90k). However, you're digging yourself into another hole here. That ship has probably long since sailed. Is it worth pursuing this? You're not going to get anything back from it either way.
    • Hi,   A few pointers from yesterday to take note of evris cpr 27.9 failed again so we should really make issue of this also their WX fail to comply with CPR so again we should take issue with their statement of truth  you cant get tort if you get damages under subsection 7 of CRA because its double recovery  - not sure what we think of this? however its the first time i saw the judges make reference to your non automatic rights from s49 which s54 and 57 assist with. We should start stating this specifically for claims as I think its much better than just 49 and 57 as we need to make it clear where our non automatic rights come from as 54 automatic frankly dont help  I have sent the claim form and defences to the admin email because I can’t upload them for some reason as it wont let me but thought this may help as its the first time we’ve taken tort to trial. although i think the DDJ was honestly struggling to understand some parts of the law because he was asking me about them and how he should interpret them, especially for the automatic. Will apply for transcript if you want it?
    • I decided on confrontation - which I hate.  Omg the arrogance of the driver.  They refused to say who had given them the alleged permission to park on the private land - unless I proved ownership.  I couldn't believe they could be so objectionable.   They advised they couldn't take public transport to work as they lived too far away.  They couldn't rent a local garage as none were available. I simply said that's their issue not mine. It was infuriating that this person had such misplaced entitlement.  However I decided to humour them and show them the title deeds.   They couldn't respond.  Although at this point they alleged some guy in a city up north - whose name they couldn't remember - gave permission!!    They then asked if they could buy the garages and land!! Yet can't afford to park on a meter !! They seemed to back down and agree to now park elsewhere.  I hope so. 
    • I've worked out the contractor invoiced apx 250k - Without adding vat to the invoices.  So based on above he should have added vat to all invoices once he reached 85k?  Obviously he had to pay his labourers - would those payments get taken off what he received?  Or it doesn't matter cos he invoiced for the high sum?
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

UKPC/DCB(Legal) 11+PCNs for privately owned van used for my Ltd Co. - PAPLOC for 5, gained Default Judgement!! - Parkhorse Shopping Centre, Church St, Hudds, HD1 2RT **SET ASIDE+CLAIM DISMISSED**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 400 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Yes. You are correct.

As it has been so long now I can’t recall who was helping me on that day and who was driving. 


Whoever it was tho appears to only have been there for mere minutes. Maybe 5 minutes. Which I think might be in the contract that there was a certain number of minutes allowed for you to load or unload.

 

I mean if you rent a shop you should be allowed to load and unload. And it is clear parking was not the intention of whoever it was anyway as they are clearly not parked in any kind of parking bay, and on some occasions clothing rails and bags of stock can be seen confirming loading or unloading. 


I think these fleeces will really be wasting their own time and money to pursue this. 


I may actually counter claim and use them for emotional stress and anxiety caused by all of this unnecessary strife. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok thanks. 
Well I guess for now it’s just a case of waiting for them to waste their time and money then. 
Do you think there’s anything I can be doing for now now? 
Or just wait? As it’s very clear I was not even driving this vehicle. I am unsure who was now. It was a long time ago. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any reply from the DVLA?  Someone else who wrote to them around rhe same time you did got an answer today.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, please do.

 

Remember we can do the redacting at this end if it's difficult for you.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for this.  Two immediate points.

 

The fleecers are supposed to ask the DVLA for your details for every "offence".  They can't just presume the keeper is the same every time.  Otherwise you could sell your van, the new owner could do something naughty, and they'd come after the wrong person. 

 

We hoped they'd been lazy and messed up but unfortunately they've done it all by the book on all 11 occasions.

 

Secondly, this is a lot of requests for information from private parking companies.  I hope you've updated all these fleecers with your new address, otherwise you could end up with a hell of a lot more backdoor CCJs like on your other thread.

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

if I didn't know better I would have thought my wife was driving for you as she has accumulated a similar number of PCNs.

 

I haven't paid any of them partly because I don't appeal: I write to the land owner or I find out why the ticket was issued incorrectly.

 

All the tickets you have from UKPC do not comply with PoFA  at the Packhorse mean that you are not liable as you are the keeper.

 

However there is one you haven't showed us from UKPC  -perhaps not from the Packhorse-on the 18/10/2019 where they have applied to the DVLA within the prescribed time. This means that if everything else on that PCN is also compliant then you would be liable to pay it should the driver not do so.

 

Usual crap from the DVLA trying to cover themselves and absolve themselves from any liability.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I’ll pay one of need be. But as a tenant who was working in his shop whilst other drivers who I don’t even know any more we’re loading and unloading to help me out, we’ll that’s just not going down. 
I am unsure where that other pcn is or was. Maybe the owner did not get the post mail. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you please post the e-mail address the DVLA replied to you from?  It would be very useful for others.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

SubjectAccess.Requests@dvla.gov.uk

10 minutes ago, lookinforinfo said:

If you find te PCN from  18/10/2019 and post it on a new thread we can take a look to see if anyhting is wrong with it.

If you can't find it no doubt they will eventually catch up with you if it hasn't already been dealt with.

I don’t know where I’d find this now? I’m surprised it didn’t come in with the SAR pack. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't worry about the extra UKPC one - they at least have your updated address.

 

Worry about any of the others.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 14/01/2023 at 12:40, lookinforinfo said:

All the tickets you have from UKPC do not comply with PoFA  at the Packhorse mean that you are not liable as you are the keeper.

 

However there is one you haven't showed us from UKPC  -perhaps not from the Packhorse-on the 18/10/2019 where they have applied to the DVLA within the prescribed time. This means that if everything else on that PCN is also compliant then you would be liable to pay it should the driver not do so.

 

Usual crap from the DVLA trying to cover themselves and absolve themselves from any liability.

 

 

they have not complied with POFA? that means me as the keeper and whoever was driving the vehicle on that day have nothing to worry about?

 

Also I don't understand what dvla are hiding here?

 

Did they not give me all the info I requested?

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mrk1 said:

So they have not complied with POFA? So that means me as the keeper and whoever was driving the veichle on that day have nothing to worry about?

No, sadly it's not as simple as that.  They have respected POFA timeframes for sending out their bilge and a judge might decide they have "substantially" complied with POFA.  Or a judge might not.  No guarantees.

 

1 hour ago, mrk1 said:

Also I don't understand what dvla are hiding here? Did they not give me all the info I requested?

The DVLA aren't hiding anything.  I don't know what you mean.  They sent exactly what they should have sent.

 

What we said was to make sure you don't get any more backdoor CCJs from any of the other companies on the long list.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

But they're fleecers.  They don't care.  They write keeper/driver on their rubbish and hope you don't know the law and will give in and/or they can fool the judge.

 

They will also say they respected Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act and can transfer liability to the keeper.  They will lie & lie & lie.

 

You need to keep up the superb work you've been putting in and build up as much evidence as possible to smash them in any future court case.

 

In about a week's time the snotty letter needs to go off.  Write Monday 23 in your diary.

 

 

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mrk1 please do not bother yourself about who was driving. You as the keeper are not liable. The only person who is liable probably could not recall the day on which they got a PCN either.

You don't know who was driving , nor do UKPC or the DVLA. So UKPC are in a pickle.  They only person known to them who could have been driving the car is you and you are not liable. End of, from your point of view. And as long as UKPC do not know who was driving they have no one to pursue that they can get  money  from. It's their own fault for taking so long to chase up the PCNs when they first occurred.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok I’ll get that date in diary. I’ll send exactly what you wrote printed out? Shouod it go to ukpc or dcbl legal? Also shall I add in it that I was not sure who was driving? 
 

So if this goes to court I only have to tell them the truth which is it wasn’t me driving. I was in my shop and someone was helping. Will the judge accept that? 

Edited by mrk1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, you can use it as is.

 

I've just gone back and edited it slightly, changing "car park" to "loading area".

 

Send copies to both UKPC and DCBL.  Part of the reason is to stir up disharmony between the two as DCBL have made a complete hash of the Letter of Claim which is supposed to be on behalf of their clients by totally mismatching the amount of money and the number of PCNs.  Invest in two 2nd class stamps (that's all the fleecers are worth) and get two free Certificates of Posting from the post office.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

How do I go about getting money from these mad men?!

In the letter you state:

 

'Should this case go to court despite having pointed out the futility of doing so, I will be asking the Court for an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g), and then spending it all on a nice, pleasant holiday while all the time laughing at your client's expense. '

 

What do I need to do so the court orders them to pay me? They have really eaten into my time over the last few weeks and it needs repaying!

Edited by mrk1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely it's self-explanatory -

 

2 hours ago, mrk1 said:

Should this case go to court ... I will be asking the Court for an unreasonable costs order

 

  • Thanks 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...