Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello everyone,   Just thought id post an update.   I've today now finally received a claim form from PRA Group. Bit annoying as the last payment to them would have August 2018 so was nearly over the line. I believe my only grounds for defence is that they haven't managed to produce a copy of the DN notice, however from some online research I managed to find some case law that stated they can use their systems screenshot to show proof of it being sent.   I know I have to respond back to their claim form and will do so online on moneyclaim, is now the time to pick up the phone to them and negotiate a deal?   Any advice as always is much appreciated it.
    • Please see my comments on your post in red
    • Thanks for your reply, I have another 3 weeks before the notice ends. I'm also concerned because the property has detoriated since I've been here due to mould, damp and rusting (which I've never seen in a property before) rusty hinges and other damage to the front door caused by damp and mould, I'm concerned they could try and charge me for damages? As long as you've documented and reported this previously you'll have a right to challenge any costs. There was no inventory when I moved in, I also didn't have to pay a deposit. Do an inventory when you move out as proof of the property's condition as you leave it. I've also been told that if I leave before a possession order is given I would be deemed intentionally homeless, is this true? If you leave, yes. However, Your local council has a legal obligation to ensure you won't be left homeless as soon as you get the notice. As stated before, you don't have to leave when the notice expires if you haven't got somewhere else to go. Just keep paying your rent as normal. Your tenancy doesn't legally end until a possession warrant is executed against you or you leave and hand the keys back. My daughter doesn't live with me, I'd likely have medical priority as I have health issues and I'm on pip etc. Contact the council and make them aware then.      
    • extension? you mean enforcement. after 6yrs its very rare for a judge to allow enforcement. it wont have been sold on, just passed around the various differing trading names the claimant uses.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Hawkes vs Halifax


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6505 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi people,

 

Just read the article in Martins Money Expert today. I have been banking with the Halifax for about 10 years and am ready to go into battle to recover my bank charges. I have printed off statements from the online service that cover nearly a whole year and it already comes to over £700! The annoying bit is when one £30 charge takes you over your overdraft limit so that they can charge a further £39.

 

As I understand it I need to send a letter asking for the details of bank charges (the 'DPA' letter) and then once I have that I can send the preliminary letter and then if that fails I issue the letter before action.

 

If someone can confirm this, I will get the appropriate letter off and keep this thread updated with my progress.

 

Cheers. :confused:

Halifax Joint A/C - Data Protection Act letter sent 2 May 06.

Preliminary letter sent 6 June 06.

LBA sent 27 June 2006.

Halifax Standard Derisory Offer received 12 July 2006.

MCOL Claim Filed 1 August 2006.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is correct - but I would seriously advise you to read through some of the other threads in the Halifax forum, and have a good read through the legal principles. It is vital that you understand fully what you are embarking on as there is still a chance you may have to face the bank in court.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for you reply, I have already stared reading through some of the threads.

Halifax Joint A/C - Data Protection Act letter sent 2 May 06.

Preliminary letter sent 6 June 06.

LBA sent 27 June 2006.

Halifax Standard Derisory Offer received 12 July 2006.

MCOL Claim Filed 1 August 2006.

Link to post
Share on other sites

because i ordered my bank statements over the phone from Scallyfax (£10 for 6 years worth) I didn't think to ask for:

 

"...where there has been any event in my account history over this period which has required manual intervention by any member of your staff or any other person, I require disclosure of any indication or notes which have either caused or resulted in that manual intervention or other evidence of that manual intervention in relation to my banking business with you."

 

I've just clicked how useful this info really is if it were to go to court in so far as it really proves how little actual human work gets done on your account and therefore how unjust the charges are. I realised the day after i sent my letter before action so hastily wrote another letter stating just the above and sent it to the the same person in their complaints dept. at least i know i'll get the info before the court date if it goes that far.

 

anyway - make sure you get this info asap and don't make the same (hopefully inconsequential) mistake i did.

"Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life." Terry Pratchett

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that little bit of info. They have reversed a couple of charges in the past so would they come under the heading of 'manual intervention'?

Halifax Joint A/C - Data Protection Act letter sent 2 May 06.

Preliminary letter sent 6 June 06.

LBA sent 27 June 2006.

Halifax Standard Derisory Offer received 12 July 2006.

MCOL Claim Filed 1 August 2006.

Link to post
Share on other sites

basically the bank's argument for charging so much is that someone has to personally go into your account whenever a dd or cheque bounces or you go over your od limit and write you a letter etc etc which is obviously crap. when they confirm little or no manual intervention has occurred they basically leave their argument in tatters...

 

manual intervention are any notes, comments or decisions made about you and your account.

 

refunds of a few charges as a goodwill gesture (which is classed as manual intervention ) makes no difference to your claim - although obviously you can't claim them twice...

 

good luck

"Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life." Terry Pratchett

Link to post
Share on other sites

DPA letter written and ready to go off in tonights post. I toned down my DPA access letter as suggested in some of the other posts and play the 'interested person' role. Once I get my sticky mits on the info, it will be time to go in properly!

Halifax Joint A/C - Data Protection Act letter sent 2 May 06.

Preliminary letter sent 6 June 06.

LBA sent 27 June 2006.

Halifax Standard Derisory Offer received 12 July 2006.

MCOL Claim Filed 1 August 2006.

Link to post
Share on other sites

DPA letter went off last night by recorded delivery. I have checked RM Track n Trace and it has been confirmed as delivered. Their move.

Halifax Joint A/C - Data Protection Act letter sent 2 May 06.

Preliminary letter sent 6 June 06.

LBA sent 27 June 2006.

Halifax Standard Derisory Offer received 12 July 2006.

MCOL Claim Filed 1 August 2006.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's a question. Financial institutions state what it costs to borrow money as the AER (annual equivalent rate - formerly known as APR). If they charge you for going over the overdraft limit then this is a further cost. How then can they state an AER when they don't know how many times you will go over your limit?????

Halifax Joint A/C - Data Protection Act letter sent 2 May 06.

Preliminary letter sent 6 June 06.

LBA sent 27 June 2006.

Halifax Standard Derisory Offer received 12 July 2006.

MCOL Claim Filed 1 August 2006.

Link to post
Share on other sites

DPA letter went off last night by recorded delivery. I have checked RM Track n Trace and it has been confirmed as delivered. Their move.

 

:? that was quick! I posted our letter end of last week and its still not showing in RM Track n Trace!

 

I tried going in just now and site down due to broken or busy server! ... wonders how many CAG members are doing a TnT!! ;)

:) Go on ... you know you want to click me :)

:lol:don't be like the banks - give a little back :lol:

:D There was a time before CAG but now CAG is here we are the empowered! :D

In progress:

Mechs and Mother (deceased) V Halifax - N1 form filed at Court 9 Aug 06

Advice & opinions of mechs, The Consumer Action Group and The Bank Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Copy statements (all 167 pages) arrived last week. Finished calculation my charges last night and have sent preliminary letter asking for the return of £2800.

Halifax Joint A/C - Data Protection Act letter sent 2 May 06.

Preliminary letter sent 6 June 06.

LBA sent 27 June 2006.

Halifax Standard Derisory Offer received 12 July 2006.

MCOL Claim Filed 1 August 2006.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Have now received a letter from the Halifax telling me that they are not going to refund my charges.

 

I am now issuing my letter before action.

Halifax Joint A/C - Data Protection Act letter sent 2 May 06.

Preliminary letter sent 6 June 06.

LBA sent 27 June 2006.

Halifax Standard Derisory Offer received 12 July 2006.

MCOL Claim Filed 1 August 2006.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Ih have received my first derisory offer from the Halifax. If have chosen not to accept this although am giving them a few more days to consider my claim before I take it to the small claims track.

 

Beware, their settlement acceptance form tries to get you to signing away your rights for other accounts!

 

Letter I am proposing is:

 

We are in receipt of your letter dated 12 July 2006 offering us the sum of £213.00 in respect of charges unlawfully deducted from our account as detailed in our letter date 27 June 2006. We would advise you that we will take your offer of £213.00 as an interim payment (which may be credited to the above roll number) but DO NOT accept this as full and final settlement of our claim.

 

In order to prevent further action which would result in further costs and the recovery of interest as allowed by the Court, we would ask you to reconsider your offer. In order for your offer to be acceptable to us it must: -

 

  • Be in an amount and form acceptable to us.
  • Be in full and final settlement of charges deducted as at the date of the claim.
  • Relate only to the bank account against which the claim is made (roll number D/35501741-6).

As a gesture of our goodwill and willingness to see an amicable solution to this matter, we are prepared to allow you an additional further 7 days over and above the timescales set out in our letter of 27 June 2006 to consider our request. Therefore, we will defer submission of our claim until 12 noon on 25 June 2006.

 

We look forward to your prompt response.

 

Ian :mad:

Halifax Joint A/C - Data Protection Act letter sent 2 May 06.

Preliminary letter sent 6 June 06.

LBA sent 27 June 2006.

Halifax Standard Derisory Offer received 12 July 2006.

MCOL Claim Filed 1 August 2006.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

MCOL claim filed!

Halifax Joint A/C - Data Protection Act letter sent 2 May 06.

Preliminary letter sent 6 June 06.

LBA sent 27 June 2006.

Halifax Standard Derisory Offer received 12 July 2006.

MCOL Claim Filed 1 August 2006.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You might find this interesting hon:

 

From a letter I had from the Halifax dated 17th May 2006 in relation to my current account.

 

"The majority of the transactions on your account are automated and all application of charges is automated. The only manual intervention around charges would be when a refund is made."

 

It's signed by Shirley Clark in Customer Services. :)

[FONT=Arial][SIZE=1]Proceedings issued....and acknowledged. [/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Arial][SIZE=1]Counting down to the 21st....[/SIZE][/FONT] [URL="http://thebighub.co.uk"]http://thebighub.co.uk[/URL]

Link to post
Share on other sites

I also had the admission that the bank is run by robots who print a signature on every letter!

 

We had another offer today but although it was 3 times the first offer it was still well short of the mark. It was too late anyway, claim form issued this morning.

Halifax Joint A/C - Data Protection Act letter sent 2 May 06.

Preliminary letter sent 6 June 06.

LBA sent 27 June 2006.

Halifax Standard Derisory Offer received 12 July 2006.

MCOL Claim Filed 1 August 2006.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, they have coughed up, sort of. They have credited my account with the value of the claim and the court fee. However they have not paid the interest and then on top of that they have nicked most of it back to pay off my overdrafts and arrears on my credit card (I assume). I am not going to notify the court that they have settled untill I have the interest. Then I'm going back into business on another Halifax account and try and move that cash before they can take it again. B******s.

Halifax Joint A/C - Data Protection Act letter sent 2 May 06.

Preliminary letter sent 6 June 06.

LBA sent 27 June 2006.

Halifax Standard Derisory Offer received 12 July 2006.

MCOL Claim Filed 1 August 2006.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We had to chase them for our interest ....they wont just pay it unfortunately.

:) Go on ... you know you want to click me :)

:lol:don't be like the banks - give a little back :lol:

:D There was a time before CAG but now CAG is here we are the empowered! :D

In progress:

Mechs and Mother (deceased) V Halifax - N1 form filed at Court 9 Aug 06

Advice & opinions of mechs, The Consumer Action Group and The Bank Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

But surely. if they don't pay they interest, the claim cannot be settled?

Halifax Joint A/C - Data Protection Act letter sent 2 May 06.

Preliminary letter sent 6 June 06.

LBA sent 27 June 2006.

Halifax Standard Derisory Offer received 12 July 2006.

MCOL Claim Filed 1 August 2006.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 12 years later...

This topic was closed on 09 March 2019.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

Halifax Joint A/C - Data Protection Act letter sent 2 May 06.

Preliminary letter sent 6 June 06.

LBA sent 27 June 2006.

Halifax Standard Derisory Offer received 12 July 2006.

MCOL Claim Filed 1 August 2006.

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6505 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...