Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Standard form being sent to large numbers of claimants. Just answer as the form asks.  No need to  go into any detail, unless the forms asks for specific details of how health impacts on daily activities. If you are worried contact Citizens Advice as they are experts with PIP, as they are trained to understand what evidence is required for assessments.
    • Resume payments with the debt collectors? You say not to pay dca though do you not? 
    • yes they mostly would be enforceable, but that wasnt the point. even if they get a CCJ the very worst they could have done is get a restriction k which is useless to them. doesnt hurt anything. the CCJ would remain on file for 6yrs yes, but then gone same as a DN. the rest k charge does not show at all. and even so, the idea was to get your debts issued a default notice ASAP, them RESUME payments.. the advise is NOT conflicting, just you don't read things properly or understand.  oh well. dx
    • This is the dilemma I had then and still have it. The bit that stopped me was the post 2015 comments about them being enforceable now in most instances which I feel hasn’t been answered unless I am missing something. the bonus I guess is not all credit agreements now will be chasing me so less people chasing me down so to speak. this is the problem as there is conflicting messaging out there it is hard to plan a strategic way forward 
    • In 2017 my wife was given PIP and I finally, officially, became her carer. In 2019 she was reviewed and we were told it would be done by phone to make it easier for her as she has mobility issues and anxiety. The review was very simple, Has anything changed? No, ok, we'll stay as you are then. In 2022 a second review, this time by phone again but with an awkward given at the end for 5 years. Today, we got a new review letter (I know wait lists are bad, but I dont think the wait will take til 2027 for a decision). We're a bit confused because it's a letter, not a phone call as before. The form is just questions that ask "has anything changed" Now, since 2017, nothing has changed except we had our home adapted via disability grant. This was noted in the phone calls. So we should really write that nothing has changed in the last 2 years. The adaptations have been mentioned in both previous phone reviews, but not in writing so I guess we should bring it up. But we feel that they want us to explain everything as if it were a new claim again... And are worried if we miss something in the original claim or the phone calls she will risk losing part of the award (a 2 point swing could be really bad) It does just say "has anything changed?" But in dealing with ESA prior to getting PIP, answering the question asked "has your condition worsened or improved" at a review process with a simple "no, I'm still the same" somehow led to ESA ending and needing appeal. So just want a bit of guidance. How much detail is needed? Is minimal ok? Or should we be blunt with the fact nothing has changed, and bullet point the things she struggles with in each section?   I know the obvious thing is to just explain it all,but over 10 years the sheer amount of times the poor woman has had ESA or PIP stopped/refused just because something was missed out in their report, or they felt it meant a new claim should be made, or that they judged her healthy because we missed a tiny thing in our forms. During COVID it finally seemed like it was all just going to be smooth, especially with the phone reviews and the 5 year reward, but here we are. We just want to make sure we have the least chance to trip ourselves up, but making sure we have what is expected if you get me? I wish I still had a copy of the forms from 2017, because I could just verbatim copy them and add in about the adaptation, but (ironically) we lost our photocopies we kept of them when the house was being adapted
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

WWW.MOUNTBATTENCARSALES.CO.UK/Close Brothers - Faulty car


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 303 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

On 28/11/2022 at 17:05, Giraffegirl13 said:

Still trying to chase a garage to do a proper report for me 🫣

 

Had this email back:

 

"I have reviewed your evidence and invoices. None of them confirm the current faults would have been present from point of sale , or provide the current mileage.

 

Unless you can provide a statement of truth from the mechanic confirming the faults were present from point of sale. We will not be able to hold the dealer liable for repairs. Can you please provide this within 7 days or we will not be able to support you further."

 

These are all the dates laid out from start to finish of all the issues I've had. Final issue was *1* day over 6mths (of course it was!), but obviously backdating all the issues is before 6mths.

 

Complaints department didn't seem to read my previous email at all.... 
 

Driven out of dealership: 29/4/22

Oil leak detected: August 2022

Clutch issue detected (and history of clutch price looked into a year before): 9/9/22

Weird metal clip found on clutch pipe (neither dealership or personal garage knew what it was, or wanted to touch it...): 9/9/22

Rear diff issue found: 4/9/22

Rear diff broke apart: 12/9/22

Rear diff replaced (£1000+): 15/9/22

Engine overheated, car broke down and now undriveable (needing £4000 repairs): 30/10/22

who is the above from?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

That was from the finance company. They emailed again yesterday "closing my complaint" because "there's nothing they can do"... 🤬

Totally ignored my claim request and other info, and the fact that issues date back within 2months of getting the vehicle.

 

Someone mentioned a section 75 claim as well?  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like I'll be putting a claim through tomorrow - how does this sound for the overview?

 

 

"The car has demonstrated a series of serious faults and is clearly not of satisfactory quality given its age, price, mileage and general condition.

 

Within the first 3 months it was found to have a faulty clutch and serious oil leak. Soon afterwards, the differential unit failed and had to be replaced in order to keep the vehicle on the road.

 

The car has now started to overheat and had to be towed back to my home, and has been unusable since 30/10/22.


Close Brothers have refused to acknowledge or investigate the serious issues that have arisen and yet I continue to pay finance on an unusable vehicle.

 

I wish the contract to be voided, all monies (and subsequent expenses) refunded, and the car taken away."

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It needs modification. Please check back tomorrow

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, got sidetracked. Standby – but the principle is that you formulate your particulars of claim simply establishing a cause of action and without giving too much detail. In fact you give as little detail as possible so that you don't give any clues as to the response.

You let the other side commit themselves in their defence and you see what they have to say. Normally speaking they tend to give their game away.
It's sort of – I'll show you mine if you show me yours, but you must show me yours first.

If you were a fella, you'd understand.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm afraid I've been out of the loop for a while and I have been trying to refresh my memory by scanning the five pages so far as this thread.
Please can you check the draft below and comment.

Anything that is wrong? Anything that is missing? Anything you would like to add?

 

Quote

I entered into a hire purchase agreement on XX date with the defendant in order to purchase a vehicle – make XX, model XX, registration number XX. Finance agreement number – XXX for £XX.
Within the first five months the vehicle demonstrated defects and is not of 
satisfactory quality.

The claimant was informed by the supplier that it was her responsibility and being unaware of her rights, she has proceeded to have certain repairs carried out at her own cost.

The vehicle is presently I drive the ball and is being stored on the claimant’s premises.
The supplier of the vehicle and the defendant have both been fully informed and have refused to take any action.

The claimant seeks full reimbursement of purchase price – £XXX

Reimbursement of repairs/improvement costs £XXX

Recently incurred expenses – insurance and so forth £XXX

The Defendant has been notified of a storage cost of £XX per day until the day of judgement or settlement of the issue.

Plus interest

Plus costs

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds perfect, Thanks! Will spellcheck and send claim later when I get back from work.

Out of interest do you know is I can look into Section 75 as paid by CC as well?

 

moneysavingexpert.com/reclaim/section75-protect-your-purchases/

 

Ah it's too long >.< lol I'll try cut it down a bit :s

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please post the draft here of whatever you decide to use before you click it off

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why should this be an action based on a credit card agreement?

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is literally as long as it can be.

 

 

 

I entered into a  By an HP agreement on 30/4/22 with the defendant in order to purchase a vehicle I bought a car
– Kia Sorento, XXXXX for £7700.


Within In the first 5 months the vehicle car demonstrated defects and is not of satisfactory quality.

 

The Claimant was informed by the supplier that it was her own responsibility. and  Being unaware of her rights, she has proceeded to have  had certain repairs carried out at her own cost.

 

The vehicle is presently undrivable and is being stored on the claimant’s her premises.

 

The supplier of the car vehicle and the defendant have both been fully informed and have declined to act refused to take any action. The 

 

Claimant seeks full reimbursement of purchase price,
repair costs & incurred expenses - £5470.53.


Defendant has been notified of storage cost.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Check the edits above. I have got you some extra space. However I have a feeling that there is another MoneyClaim beta website which allows you a greater word limit.

@dx100uk @Andyorch

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Thanks 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Forms part of your total claim so will be paid back if the claim is successful along with interest on the amount claimed.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

But I've suddenly realised that the total comes to more than 10,000

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think we probably should have made it clear that we were seeking reimbursement of the money paid so far which would then all come to less than £10,000.

I have to put this when the directions questionnaire comes through

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It can sometimes still remain a small claim if the costs differentiate and exceed the threshold.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, I was adding the full value of the car to the 5,000 .

I was having a senior moment!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Not heard a peep from anyone about my court case (apart from the confirmation email and 1 letter in the post saying Finance company were served on the 24th Dec).

Tomorrow (9th Jan) is the last day for them to 'respond' to my claim, and if they don't respond I have to put it to a judge.

I haven't yet put any evidence forward, apart from my opening statement - I presume if Finance refuse to respond and I take it to a judge, I will be notified and have to put all my invoices etc in as evidence?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

they must acknowledge the claim by day 19 from the date on your claimform.

however there is one extra day added for the holiday period + this time of year, mail/emails etc typically take an extra week to be seen. so add 7 dyas too. if by then no AOS done you could try and request judgement. again via mcol.

 

 

keep an eye on MCOL status .

 

dx

 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • I agree 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...