Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You typed it in? actually typed it all out? if so, maybe you took too long or something, like session timed out. Does the status show defence filed or no change?
    • Hi just typed all defence clicked next and it's deleted all. Any help
    • I forgot to say, there is one last possibility and that is that they will receive your letter of rejection and simply fold, accept the rejection and refund you. Don't wait too long for this. Seven days maximum – but in that seven days you could send your letter of claim anyway and when that you don't hear from them or when they start mucking around at least you are seven days closer to beginning the legal action – and they will know it (which is the important thing).
    • Okay that is excellent that you have an email between the garage and the warranty company confirming that there is a serious problem with the gearbox. That is very powerful evidence. I think the situation is this: you have sent them a letter of rejection but the reputation of big motoring world is that they won't take a lot of notice and they will try to prevaricate and maybe even blame you. Clearly you don't want the car any more and anyway it sounds as if the cost of repairs is going to be enormous. You don't know if the warranty company is going to step up to the mark but the whole thing is going to take a long time and I understand that you have lost confidence in big motoring world because of this event and also their reputation which you are now discovering on Facebook and on this forum and no doubt elsewhere. On the basis that you don't want the car any more and you want your money back, you need to hurry things along. I think the first thing is that you need to decide if you are prepared to bring a claim in the County Court. Even without the warranty money, the claim is worth more than £10,000. For actions less than £10,000, you bring a "small claim" and this means that even if you lose the case you won't be liable for the other side's costs. If you win the case then not only will you get your money plus interest but also you will recover all of the costs of the action. For actions more than £10,000, you go to something called the "fast track" and in the event that you lose the case, then you could be liable to reimburse the winner some of the costs. This means that in addition to not recovering your own money, you would lose your own court fees and also you would have to to bear the costs of the other side probably something less than £5000 – but as a rough guess. If you bring your court claim then your chances of success are almost 100%. Frankly if you brought a court claim then I can imagine that big motoring world will put their hands up and pay you out rather than face go to court and losing and getting a judgement against them. However, it you need to consider that this is a risk factor – although my view it is a negligible risk factor. If you did bring a court case, it wouldn't be instant. If they put their hands up then it would probably happen very quickly. If they didn't put their hands up then you could take anything up to a year for the matter to be resolved and during that time you would be without your car and without your money and in the middle of litigation. I'm explaining this to you say that you understand how it works. Bring a court case would be really the last resort when everything else has failed. However, I'm quite certain that you would win and it would be stupid of big motoring world to try to resist. In order to bring a court case you would have to send a letter of claim giving them 14 days to accept rejection and organise the refund otherwise you would begin the claim. Don't imagine that you could bluff this. If you did send a letter of claim then you would have to go through with it otherwise you lose all credibility and you might as well pack up and go home. So with this in mind, here are possible courses of action you could take. You can simply wait and see what their reaction to your letter of rejection will be. However they may not reply or else they may find some other reason to delay and of course during that time you will be without your car and without your money blah blah blah, not knowing if big motoring world were going eventually to start acting sensibly and respectfully towards you. The second thing you can do – and I think this has been suggested on Facebook – is that you can go along there and simply make yourself present and talk to other customers and generally speaking make a nuisance of yourself and embarrass them to the point where you would be explaining to other potential customers to be careful, to look on Facebook, and to do some careful research before they put their business to big motoring world. This has a reasonable chance of success although you would have to be careful. You should go accompanied by a friend and there should be no anger, no arguments, nothing that could be considered as being overly aggressive so that big motoring world would have no justification in kicking you out or even worse, calling the police. If you did this, then I would suggest that you record everything on the telephone carried in a pocket. A fully charged battery will probably keep a voice recorder and a telephone going for more than 20 hours or 30 hours. The other person can video any incidents so that everything is clear and you can inform big motoring world then it will be going up on the Internet. If you did this, my favourite option would be to issue the letter of claim giving them 14 days, and then going along to big motoring world with a copy of your letter of rejection and a copy of the exchange between the mechanic and the warranty company and a copy of your letter of claim – all settled together – and probably about 20 or 30 copies in all and I would start handing them out to any customers who came in. Big motoring world will soon get the picture and they will either move your the premises in which case you stand outside and carry on doing it or they will finally give in. Of course there is a chance that they won't give in and they will simply call your bluff – but in that case I think you have no choice other than to follow through with your 14 day threat in the letter of claim and to begin the legal action. At the same time you should be putting up reviews on Google and also trust pilot explaining exactly what has happened and also explaining that the mechanic has confirmed to the warranty company that there is the serious problem, that you have asserted the right to reject and that this is been ignored by big motoring world and that you have now sent a letter of claim and that you will be starting a legal action in 14 days. Once again, don't bluff about the legal action. If you threaten it – then you must mean it – and on day 15 you click of the claim. You don't need a solicitor for any of this. It's all fairly straightforward and of course we will help you all the way that it the decision is yours to make and I think you need to make it fairly quickly. I think the cost of starting an action for about £13,000 is 5% and then also if it goes to trial which I would say is almost impossible – there would be an additional fee. You would claim interest at 8%. A judge might award a lower figure but frankly if you can show that big motoring world is attempting to ride roughshod over your very clear statutory consumer rights, I can imagine that the judge will want to show displeasure by awarding the full 8% which is a pretty good rate – even though it's not compensation for the hassle and the distress you are going through. If you decide to get solicitor, then if you win the case, because it is over £10,000 you will recover some of your costs but you won't recover all of them. If the solicitor begins by having exchanges of letters then I doubt whether you will be up to recover the cost of those and you could easily find that you're chalking up 500 quid or even a thousand simply on initial exchanges of correspondence. Also you need to bear in mind that if after having exchanges with a solicitor, big motoring world cave in – then you definitely won't get those costs back because you won't have gone to court and therefore a judge will not have made the order for payment of those costs. I suggest very strongly that you avoid paying any money for a solicitor and that you do it yourself. It's not a big deal – although you will have to you react quickly to the help we offer on this forum. Also, an additional benefit is that you will learn a lot and you will gain confidence and eventually you will feel good about suing anybody else who gets in your way. Nothing not to like! If you do decide to instruct a solicitor then you must take control of the solicitor. Most of them prefer to sit in an office writing letters on the clock. If you do decide to instruct a solicitor then you must instruct the solicitor very firmly that they should send one letter of complaint giving seven days. A second letter – a letter of claim giving 14 days and that they must then begin the action. If you don't do this. If you don't take control then it will simply cost you money, you will be without your car even longer and of course without your money. The whole thing is a nightmare. I think I've laid out the options but please do ask questions. I hope you can see that this is the kind of advice that you won't be getting on Facebook. Nothing against Facebook. It's good as a meeting place and to make people realise that they aren't on their own – but after that the advice given is weak and confusing.  
    • What makes you say that?  I have no idea how I would go about that or why they would even entertain discussions now that they've won the Court case
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Spring Parking ltd/DCB(Legal) 6 2019 ANPR PCNs claimform - 1-3 Upper Green East, Mitcham, Surrey, Cr4 2pe ***Claim Discontinued***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 471 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Yes, please upload the LoC when you get a minute.

 

It turns out the other case I mentioned was also DCBL and I think I'm beginning to work out what has happened here.  But let's see the LoC.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes they must be called to account as if they won on the dodgy POC, likely they would be knocking in their HCEO incarnation as the Channel 5 Can't Pay Guy's and add eye watering fees to the judgment if it wasn't paid.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 26/09/2022 at 13:20, brassnecked said:

Yes they must be called to account as if they won on the dodgy POC, likely they would be knocking in their HCEO incarnation as the Channel 5 Can't Pay Guy's and add eye watering fees to the judgment if it wasn't paid.

 

they cant 'just send bailiffs' even over the £600 HCEO threshold, the high court must be approached and assign them.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

True DX, but with such an amount they would likely do just that if the judgment was for the fleecers for full amount.  Its unlikely that they will get such a judgment in this case though.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Letters of Claim are what I expected after remembering chinoky's thread  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428866-capital-car-parkdcbl-claimform-chandlers-avenue-barge-walk-greenwich-peninsula-se10-0pe/  which is also DCBL.

 

The PPC were after chinoky for invoice A, invoice B & invoice C.  The Particulars of Claim were for invoice A, invoice B, and, er, invoice B again.

 

In your case they are after you for invoice A, invoice B, invoice C, invoice D & invoice E & invoice F.  The Particulars of Claim are for invoice A, invoice B, invoice B, invoice B, invoice B & invoice B.  See the pattern?!

 

In chinocky's case they blamed the error on rubbish software, which I ridiculed at the time, but they may well have useless software which can't deal with more than two PCNs and thus these huge mess-ups for their clients.  Long may it continue!

 

I've looked it up and PoCs can only be changed if the other party agrees (DCBL asked chinoky who obviously ignored them) or with the consent of the court (presumably after paying a £275 fee).  It wasn't worth them paying the fee in chinoky's case.

 

They may pay the fee in your case or they might discontinue the claim for these two invoices and go after you for the remaining four.  We'll see.  All conjecture at the moment.  The important thing is to file the prepared defence on 3 October.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

However, two things.  Why are you ignoring these Letters of Claim?  The fleecers partly send LoCs as a fishing exercise.  If someone doesn't reply, the fleecers reckon they might have moved and they might not reply to a claim form either, giving them an easy default win.  It's always much better to reply at that point.

 

Secondly, together with your other thread, you've had seven invoices for the same car park.  Obviously we're on your side against the vampires, but if you get such a huge volume of tickets eventually a judge will rule some of them as valid.  You're lucky that DCBL have such rubbish software!  Isn't it just easier to follow what is written on their daft signs and save yourself the bother?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

@FTMDave thanks. All points are acknowledged and well-noted.

 

However, if there was one thing I'd strongly refute,

 

it is the claim that I regularly tend to stay beyond two hours at the car park in question.

 

I could stake my last dime on this being a false claim, but sadly, I don't have the benefit of a camera or any other form of evidence to back my argument, so I tend not to even argue the point.

 

My typical Saturdays are extremely busy, highly mobile/on the move and with lots of personal engagements, be it at home or away from home.

 

Therefore, the suggestion that I'd even stay in any particular car park for over two hours, has me scratching my head.

 

I just couldn't afford that luxury on a Saturday of all days.........and on a regular basis too.

 

I can assure you, there's absolutely no reason why anything in or around the alleged premises would keep me parked there for over two hours.

 

There's no shopping mall and barely anything of interest to keep one there for that length of time, on a frequent basis. 

 

Aside the Better Gym where being a member I used to visit on weekends and whose members were entitled to use this very car park (and by the way as a personal policy, one hour was always my maximum workout duration),

 

I cannot for the life of me imagine how or why I'd stay on those premises beyond two hours. 

 

With the exception of a medium-sized Morrisons supermarket, the only other notable shops or businesses around those premises (Superdrug, Lloyds Bank, Boots and Farmfoods) are very small branches.

 

Aside the two Morrisons and Farmfoods branches, I barely ever visit any of the others anyway.

 

All this has me wondering whether they're not making this claim based perhaps on two separate visits to that car park on each given date,

 

where they've paired the time of my first entry (let's say 2pm) with the time of my exit of a later visit (let's say 5:30pm).

 

Judging by how they've gone on to botch the Particulars of Claim and the revelation by @FTMDave about their possible use of some dodgy software, would this be too far-fetched a thought?

 

I just pray for the day when all of these wretched private car park companies would be outlawed for good and we can have some peace at last from all their exploitation and outrageous practices.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well they will have to produce each ANPR PCN and each must have in and out pictures at WS stage 

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The times on those PCN's might be very interesting, if you can prove or show reasonable cause that you were elsewhere, that might give them a problem

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

@hitman126very interesting, it hadn't clicked with me that this could be "double dipping" (description of visiting a car park twice and the fleecers' useless cameras treating them as one long visit).

 

The problem here is that £1370 is a lot of money and I would guess - it is only a guess - that when they realise the Particulars of Claim are wrong they'll fork out £275 to get them changed.  I can't see this easily going away. 

 

I see you've got the PCN dates, but they are not the dates of the actual parking.  Once the defence is filed on Monday I think it would be a good idea to SAR the vampires and get sight of every single one of the PCNs.  Obviously you won't be able to remember what you were doing in 2019 but you might for example have bank records showing proof of purchases elsewhere. 

 

It could also be that there are more of these invoices in the pipeline.  Let us know straight away if any others turn up.

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Standard response.

 

However, this will help you later down the line in your Witness Statement.  You'll be able to say that when you asked to see proof of planning permission and of a contract with the landowner giving the fleecers the right to sue under their own name - they refused to supply such evidence.  You believe neither of these important legal permissions exists.

 

That's if it gets that far.

 

They will not be happy next week when you defence rolls up.

 

D-Day is Monday for defence and a SAR to the vampires.

 

 

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, by all means submit the defence on Sunday.  Write exactly what is drafted on the previous page.  You need to humiliate the other party over the rubbish PoCs.

 

The MCOL site often has maintenance work done on it over the weekend, so don't worry if it doesn't work on Sunday - it will on Monday.

 

Can you confirm which date exactly you sent the SAR?

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

No good ever filing defences etc on a w/end, courts close at 4pm fri. Won't be registered till Monday 

 

But anyway your defence is not due to/by 4pm Tuesday 

 

Dx

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

By the way, this weekend, I managed to obtain pictures of the parking signs around the premises

of the land in question and have a couple of them attached.

 

Hopefully, they might have some flaws that can be incorporated into in my defense statement. 

Thanks.

 

 

pixs.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Spring Parking ltd/DCB(Legal) 6 2019 ANPR PCNs claimform - 1-3 Upper Green East, Mitcham, Surrey, Cr4 2pe.

The signs that are there seem clear - but there aren't very many of them.

 

Usual PPC MO - post a few signs up, hope no-one will see them, so they have an excuse to issue their invoices.

 

Get your defence in tomorrow! 

 

File it exactly as prepared.  Extra stuff such as their rubbish signage will go in your Witness Statement later down the line.

 

 

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will definitely be submitting that defence statement before close of business today @ 4pm.

 

By the way, this is just a personal thought, but are there any official channels for Joe Public to challenge current legislation on how parking companies should be operating, etc?

 

I ask because I personally find it rather exploitative and deliberate that they use these ANPR devices to constantly hound motorists,

 

when for instance local authorities continue to invest in parking meters which issue you with tickets to stick on the window or windscreen of your car, but more importantly, provide full visibility of any parking time limits you're bound to.

 

Thanks to these stick-on tickets, how many motorists in the past can we all recall rushing back to the car to "top-up" at the parking meter and then head back to carry on with their shopping or other activity, when they realised their parking duration was nearly up? Countless..........but at least fair to the motorist!!

 

And if you failed to return to "top-up" and were given a ticket, you had little cause to dispute it because the evidence was there in black and white and available to all parties, including the motorist................

 

unlike these ANPR devices which are available solely to the parking company, but we're required to acknowledge their "evidence" as gospel.

 

What's there to prove these parking companies do not manipulate these ANPR devices (entry and exit times, etc) for their own ffinancial benefit?

 

After all, we all know how speed cameras, etc, have for years been purposely used as a money-making tool for many a council/local authority, so what's there to prove parking companies aren't installing these ANPR devices influenced

purely by similar money-making motive?

 

Why not use parking meters where the motorist could park, pay and have full visibility and awareness of any parking time limits to be adhered to?

 

Today, there are even parking apps like RingGo which allow you to park, pay and/or top-up remotely without being anywhere near the vehicle or parking machine, or even having to rush back to obtain a new adhesive ticket for the car windscreen or window.

 

I personally think the use of these ANPR devices by parking companies to monitor vehicle entry and exit times is abhorrent, unethical and sneaky,

 

especially in light of the current financial crisis we're all facing and they're simply installed to entrap and exploit the ordinary motorists for financial gain.

 

I for one would strongly lobby for them to be completely abolished for the

aforementioned use by parking companies, if I had any such influence. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done.

 

This should be fun when DCBL realise how badly they've messed up the Particulars of Claim.

 

As for your other points.  Well the government started the process of regulating the vile industry in 2019 and then published a code of practice in February aimed at stopping the worst practices.  Predictably the fleecers have acted like the CoP doesn't exist and are currently challenging it legally on two points.

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...