Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • sorry she is a private individual, the cars are parking on her land. she can clamp the cars. only firms were outlawed from doing it bazza. thats what the victims of people dumping cars on their drives near airports did and they didn't not get prosecuted.    
    • The DVLA keeps two records of you. One as a driver and one for your car. If they differ you might find out in around a month when they will send you a reminder as well as to your other half for their car. If you receive nothing then you can be fairly sure that you were tailgating though wouldn't explain why they didn't pick up your car on one of drive past their cameras. However even if you do get a PCN later the your situation will not change. The current PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 which is the main law that covers private parking. It doesn't comply for two reasons. 1. Section 9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN states 47 minutes which are the arrival and departure times not the time you were actually parked. So if you subtract the time you took to drive from the entrance. look for a parking place and park in it perhaps having to manoeuvre a couple of times to fit within the lines and then unload the children followed by reloading the children getting seat belts on etc before driving to the exit stopping for cars, pedestrians on the way you may well find that the actual time you were parked was quite likely to be around ten minutes over the required time.  Motorists are allowed a MINIMUM of ten minutes Grace period [something that the rogues in the parking industry conveniently forget-the word minimum] . So it could be that you did not overstay. 2] Sectio9 [2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN does not include the words in brackets and in 2a the Act included the word "must". Another fail. What those failures mean is that MET cannot transfer the liability to pay the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable which is why we recommend our members not to appeal. It is so easy to reveal who was driving by saying "when I parked the car" than "when the driver parked the car".  As long as they don't know who was driving they have little chance of winning in court. This is partly because Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. And because anyone with a valid motor insurance policy is able to drive your cars. It is a shame that you are too far away to get photos of the car park signage. It is often poor and quite often the parking rogues lose in Court on their poor signage alone. I hope hat you can now relax and not panic about the PCN. You will receive many letters from Met, their unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors threatening you with ever higher amounts of money. The poor dears have never read the Act which states quite clearly that the maximum sum that can be charged is the amount on the signs. The Act has only been in force for 12 years so it may take a  few more years for the penny to drop.  You can safely ignore everything they send you unless or until they send you a Letter of Claim. Just come back to us if they do send one of those love letters to you and we will advise on a snotty letter to send them. In the meantime go on and enjoy your life. Continue reading other threads and if you do get any worrying letters let us know. 
    • Hopefully the ANPR cameras didn't pick up the two vehicles, but I don't think you're out of the woods just yet. MET's "work" consists of sending out hundreds of these invoices every week so yours might be a few days behind your partner's. There is also the matter of Royal Mail.  I once sold two second-hand books to someone on eBay.  Weirdly the cost of sending them separately was less than the cost of sending them in one parcel.  So to save a few bob I sent them seperately.  One turned up the next day.  One arrived after four days.  They were  sent from the same post office at the same time! But let's hope I'm being too pessimistic. Please update us of any developments.
    • New version after LFI's superb analysis of the contract. Sorry, but you need to redo the numbering of the paras and of the exhibits in the right order after all the damage I've caused! Defendant's WS - version 4.pdf
    • Hi  no nothing yet. Hope it stays that way 😬
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Premier anpr PCN Letter of Claim - overstay - No it's Double-Dipping! - Sydney Cove Car Park 2, Praa Sands, Cornwall


Recommended Posts

Hi all.

 

We went on holiday to Cornwall last year, paid for parking, got a charge through the post to my limited company name who used to have the vehicle on contract hire.  Have not made any contact so far.  This week received a letter before action with tomorrows deadline.  By chance we are on holiday again in the same place so I was able to get some pictures of the car park.

 

Questionnaire-

 

------------

1 Date of the infringement 11 August 2011 18:02

 

2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 10th September 2021 is first letter made available from lease company but it does say first reminder.  I received one to my company name on 18th September 2021.
 

ntk - redacted.pdf - this is a copy emailed to me from the lease hirer.  don't have my copy to hand as I'm away 

 

3 Date received 18th September 2021 but see previous
 

4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] Yes
 

5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Picture on the NTK
 

6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No
 

Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up N/A
 

7 Who is the parking company? Premier Park Ltd

 

8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Sydney Cove Car Park 2, Praa Sands, Cornwall
 

For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under.

POPLA ?

There are two official bodies, the BPA and the IAS. If you are unsure,

please check HERE

 

------------------

What's the best way to proceed?  Ignore and see if they do file a claim?  If I respond is there different advice with it going to my company and not a driver?

 

I have a photo of the ticket I placed on my windscreen.  It's one where you enter your reg number.  ticket_Redacted.pdf Paid from 9:07 to 17:07.  I remember leaving to go to the supermarket to buy food for the bbq.  Then came back to pick up the wife and kids.  I'm assuming camera has caught me going back out again.  

 

 

I have taken pictures of the car park entrance and signage.   car park.pdf

 

Many thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you ignore a Letter Before Action the fleecers generally think you might ignore a claim form too and so they would get an easy default judgement.

 

That's why we always say to reply with a snotty letter at this stage, and if the deadline is tomorrow you need to get a move on.

 

From your description it seems like a case of "double dipping", i.e. their rubbish cameras haven't been able to distinguish between two separate visits.

 

Two things.

 

I know it's a long shot from a year ago, but have you got proof of payment at the supermarket - a credit card statement for example?

 

Also, tomorrow morning can you get the lease company to send you the proper original PCN?  Then we can get to the bottom of what the fleecers are claiming and get an appropriate snotty letter off.

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Premier anpr PCN Letter of Claim - overstay - No it's Double-Dipping! - Sydney Cove Car Park 2, Praa Sands, Cornwall

Thanks I'll see what lease company say but I think they are saying they only ever got the first reminder.  They like to charge me for each letter they receive so I'm sure they wouldn't miss it out.

 

Credit card statement only goes back 4 months.  I've checked my bank account and there is one for CoOp with transaction date of 4th August but no time.  Not even 100% sure if this is the one as we went there in the morning sometimes to buy bits for lunch and often Sainsburys for BBQ food.  Plus we was with friends he may have paid that time, I know he came with me.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, the urgent thing is a snotty letter to show them that you would be big trouble in court so it's best they give up on you and go after some mug who would be terrified and just cough up.  The rest can wait.  How about -

 

 

Dear Will & John,

 

cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in mirth at the idea you actually thought I'd take such tripe seriously and put my hand in my pocket!

 

As usual you'll have been too bone idle to do any due diligence whatsoever otherwise you'd have seen your client's case is total pants.  Given your shenanigans with the IPC and the IAS you'll be very familiar with the phrase "double dipping".  I can easily prove to a judge my vehicle was elsewhere when your clients say it was in their car park.  They really should stop buying their cameras second hand for £9.99 on eBay.

 

Oh dear.  Your greedy clients have added £70 Unicorn Food Tax plus you haven't bothered to look up real solicitors' fixed costs for this amount of claim.  Doubt a judge would be very impressed.

 

Your clients can either drop this foolishness now or either get a total hammering in court.  Their choice.  If the latter I will of course request an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g) and then spend it all on a holiday back in Cornwall while laughing at your client's expense.

 

I look forward to your deafening silence.

 

COPIED TO PREMIER PARK LTD: YOU'RE ABOUT TO BE GLADSTONED!

 

 

Gladstones are corrupt solicitors who set up their own parking association where they judge themselves, thus all the mentions of the IPC and the IAS.

 

Send the letter off tomorrow 1st class both to Gladstones and Premier Park and get two free Certificates of Posting from the post office.

 

By complete coincidence yesterday for another thread I looked at how many Premier Park cases we have on the site.  Thirty.  They only did court in two.  And lost them both!  So the snotty letter should see them off.  No absolute guarantees of course.

 

I'll edit the dates as requested.

Edited by FTMDave
Typo
  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

E-mail is better than not replying.

 

But ideally you should use Royal Mail as Homer says.  We've seen the fleecers abuse e-mail several times in the past.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...