Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you. The fact it was a permit-holder car park, rather than a pay car park, does help your case.  You can argue Prohibition at least. Have a look at the attachment in post 40 here  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/466177-ukpc-2x-windscreen-pncs-claimform-forgot-permit-appealed-res-parking-my-own-space-east-croft-house-86-northolt-road-south-harrow-ha2-0es-claim-dismissed/page/2/#comments You can use the introduction, Prohibition section, Double Recovery section and the concluding Statement of Truth as the basis for your own Witness Statement.  Your case is virtually identical.
    • Embracing diversity: The key to unlocking business successView the full article
    • Parking dispute - DCB Legal 09:05:24.pdfHi there, Please find attached the correspondence to date as requested. I have attached everything that I have in terms of correspondence. To the points raised: Your case is not looking too good at this stage. Not helped by the car park not appearing on Google Street view.  Interesting that UKPC seem to think that Walcot Yard is off Walcot Road when it is off Walcot Street. Part of Walcot Yard has the postcode BA1 5DW which is a building called North Range. You would have to find out where in Bath they would know the specific post code for the car park there since if it were the 5DW ending you may be able to claim that you weren't in BA1 5BG Walcot yard, Walcot Road, but BA1 5DW Walcot yard, Walcot Street.  >> Thank you, I am trying to find more information on this.  But probably the main help would come from the site manager. A  written statement from him explaining the informal situation with the land owner or better still  finding out who the land owner is  and contacting them might help. though getting UKPC to cancel at this late stage will be next to impossible. >> I can also do this. The site manager is able to provide a written statement. However, they have not been able to contact the site operator, who lives elsewhere in the UK. It is a very frustrating situation but I have really tried.  
    • no we dont give private advise helps no-one bar YOU not what CAG is about. post it here dx    
    • Thanks for the reply Dubai 50. will keep on filing everything in the bin, physically and digitally. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Arrows and old MBNA debt - used CCA request £1 as payment , says not SB because of it!!


pilch23
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 710 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

 

Hi forum,

 

2007 MBNA credit card debt purchased by Arrow Global Guernsey Ltd, no payments ever made.

 

Moorcroft Group Plc chasing debt on behalf of Arrow...no payment ever made but CCA request made 1st June 2016 with £1 postal order attached.  No response ever received.

 

No further correspondence until 3rd February 2022 from Drydensfairfax  solicitors advising they are representing Arrow to recover debt.

 

Statute Barred letter sent 8th February.

 

Response from  Drydensfairfax received 14th February, stating last payment made on 4th June 2016 so not SB until 4th June 2022.

 

The only way a payment could be registered is if they used the postal order against the account, which was stated in the CCA letter the funds could not be used for anything else.

 

Next course of action please?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So the debt was assigned to Arrow in 2007 ....CCA request with fee made June 2016.

 

Debt was already Statute Barred by 9 years before the CCA request. Inform them same and inform them a CCA request paymant is not an acknowledgment or payment to the debt. The debt is and remains statute barred.

 

Andy

  • Like 2

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy

 

In the paperwork I have there is a big gap between 2007 and 2016 so not 100% sure when I stopped paying, but certainly many years before 2016, just not 100% if full 6 years or I would have issued SB rather than CCA in 2016 i'm guessing.

 

Can I request a statement of my account and payments from Drydensfairfax?  Or just as above and request they prove otherwise?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well either way it will be statute barred in June this year if not already.... irrespective if the CCA fee. You could ring MBNA or check online if you still have a log in facility to the last payment made direct to MBNA.

 

Once you have this information..and only then...  inform Drydensfairfax they are chasing a lemon.

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

34 minutes onto MBNA to be advised my account is closed with them, they no longer have any information on my account due to age and would have been passed to a collection agency.

 

Do I speak with Arrow Global to find out last payment date?  They are listed as the client by Drysdenfairfax.

 

My CCA was sent to Moorcroft Debt Recovery who in 2016 was chasing on behalf of Arrow Global.

 

Appreciate SB in June either way but my concern would be Drysdenfairfax issue Court Proceedings prior to this date?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good...... if MBNA have no data because of age neither do Arrow or Drysdenfairfax ...let them prove it wasn't SB before the CCA request.

 

If they do issue a claim then the same argument applies...its Statute barred or prove otherwise.

 

 

 

.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have told them its statute barred...they have said its not you paid a £1....they know that would probably be for a CCA request.

Let them decide now if they wish to pursue this further.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

and they have yet to issue a letter of claim anyway so fat chance of a court claim before june anyway as that extends time before a claimform  can be issued by 60days

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Arrows and old MBNA debt - used CCA request £1 as payment , says not SB because of it!!

so if/when they issue a LOC you copy the 1st page

staple another copy of our SB letter to it

and post it back.

 

till then yours is not the next move.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, dx100uk said:

and they have yet to issue a letter of claim anyway so fat chance of a court claim before june anyway as that extends time before a claimform  can be issued by 60days

 

dx

 

Wow horsey..slow down read and understand what i said above...

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, dx100uk said:

so if/when they issue a LOC you copy the 1st page

staple another copy of our SB letter to it

and post it back.

 

till then yours is not the next move.

 

dx

 

 
dx was going by this comment?

Link to post
Share on other sites

you need to run the 30days you have to reply...geddit?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Day 25 to be on the safe side.

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you.

 

If they do issue court papers, am I correct my defence will be SB as last payment June 2014 and provide copy of CCA letter to Moorcroft stating no admission and PO not be used towards payment?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont worry about a defence for now lets see if they do issue a claim for a SB debt on the pretense of a CCA payment of acknowledgment and I will draft you a suitable defence.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Update…

 

Responded as advised to Letter of Claim.

 

Drydens responded by letter dated 07/04 stating that they were referring to their client and it would be put on hold until further instruction.

 

Letter received 19/04 but dated 08/04 stating “unfortunately our client has been unable to provide statements of the account’ followed by however, you owe the money and last payment was 4th June 2016 (£1 paid to Moorcroft for CCA) so not stature barred…please contact us to make payment.

 

Do I just simply ignore? and see their next course of action?

 

My actual last payment 14th June 2014 so well stature barred but they are still claiming not until 4th June 2022.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you ignore them.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Further Letter of Claim received this morning dated 27th May.

 

I have advised SB as last payment was 14th June 2014.  They have used CCA payment as last payment date which was 4th June 2016.

 

As above thread I have previously responded to earlier LOC that it is SB.

 

So even by their reckoning SB this Saturday in 5 days time!
 

I have 28 days to respond to LOC.


What is my next course of action please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The same 

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

the same ................as you did before

never ignore an LOC

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...