Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks dx for your kind words. I plan to renew my season ticket and write a new begging letter as following, can I ask for any suggestion about it?   Dear Investigator/Prosecutor,   Thank you for your reply. I deeply regret my actions and the inconvenience they have caused.   I’m extremely remorseful for my crime. and regret it everyday. I often ask myself ‘’how can I do that thing just because I felt it is interesting. There are a lot of crimes in the world, but feeling it’s interesting is certainly not a reason to crime. I should not crime with any reason.’’ I think about these things every day, and I understand that I can’t blame anyone but myself.   I thanks to the staff who stopped me, as this is a valuable lesson in my life. I told myself that I should never ever repeat such a thing again, and never ever do anything which is possible to be in breach of any law. As a result, I carefully tap my oyster card every time before I enter the station now. I remind myself that I did a wrong thing before, and I should never let it happen again.   Although my monthly travel expenses do not warrant a season ticket, but I just renew my season ticket (please see the attachment). I understand that a crime cannot be truly compensated for, but purchasing a season ticket offers me a small measure of comfort, knowing that my actions caused a loss to the public interest.   I received an email which ask me to negotiate being class teacher in this summer (please see the attachment). I hope that I could teach the lovely students again, which may not be allowed with a criminal record. I would please ask that you would please provide me a single opportunity to settle all outstanding sums owed outside of court without the need for legal proceedings which would have a determinantal impact on my teaching career.   I sincerely apologise again for my crime. If you need anything further from me to help you please let me know.    Yours sincerely,
    • You did what??? You asked them to send you the documents that without them you had  a 100% ironclad win in Court. Why on earth would you do that? As it happens in this case, there is still enough mistakes in their PCNs and the NTH to have your case cancelled. Amd it may be that not sending those documents in the first place along with the ICO complaint and the letters from Alliance themselves which would confirm by the dates on the letters may be enough to cancel it anyway. I hope you have kept their letters as evidence? The chances are that Alliance will not actually take you to Court because of their errors but you never know.  You have made so much extra work for yourself in your WS if they decide to push their luck.though. Can you please post up their letter where they give the reason why I wasn't sent with the NTH.
    • I'm not sure that I fully agree with my site team colleague above.  My understanding is that there is nothing to stop you recording but it is strictly for your own personal use.   
    • I live in a student house, with 5 tenants, unihomes is our utilities provider, who we each have a direct debit set up with and have paid each bill every month. Two letters were sent in my name by BWLegal saying I had two outstanding payments due adding up to over £3500, I have tried to contact british gas (as that is apparently our houses provider) as well as Unihomes. Nothing has helped and BWlegal are pursuing legal action if these debts are not resolved by the 1st May. What do I do? I've called Bwlegal when i bring up that the debt isnt for me and for unihomes they hang up on me. so I am stressed and do not know what to do
    • cant do either if its not in a public place or on your land. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

EVRi (evri) Stolen sold MacBook court claim issued


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 262 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

In fact I see that this is been going on for a long time.

I think it's important that you post up your witness statement before you send it off as our ideas have moved on a bit and there are probably some important modifications to make.

Also have you included the copies of the three judgements that we have here in your bundle?

We don't need the whole bundle. They witness statement and the your index page should be sufficient for the moment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The witness statement is excellent. In fact it contains all the modifications that I intended to make – is this  something I did for you already or did you find it somewhere else on the forum please? Can you give us a link. I probably did it already somewhere and forgot

Also, when it comes to the hearing, to make sure that you are totally in control of the section 57 and section 72 arguments. Your case turns on these sections.

Also make sure that you insist that it is an insurance policy – whatever the other side tried to say about it. It is "insurance" although insurance or not, it is still a section 72 secondary contract – which is the important thing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the modifications you are referring to are about adding the new case, that was me but the I found the whole skeleton argument here: 

I really appreciate the advice and will keep reading my bundle the next two weeks. If everything is okay now I'll get the document sent to Parcel2Go and the court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Blimey, and I think I only made these amendments yesterday. And I forgot already!

I think the only thing that might be missing from your index sheet is a copy of their terms and conditions where they make it clear that without the insurance, your compensation will be limited to £20.


You don't need to put the whole contract – but if you can get hold of that page or screenshot and insert that recently early on in your list of documents.

I think the only suggestion I have to make is that you should put the full name of the case at the top of the first document. You only have your name and the case number.

This is more than adequate to identify the claim – but still I think it would look better – and the name of the court

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to EVRi (evri) Stolen sold MacBook court claim issued

if its your total court claim sum sounds good..

 

dx

 

  • I agree 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you claim interest? And does their offer include interest?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You must not give up a single penny – and also if they tried to introduce a confidentiality clause into the offer – refuse. It is not part of the claim and if they bring that in then if they want extra then they must pay extra.
Keep us updated on this please

Link to post
Share on other sites

why are all these recent threads where people issue a court claim NOT claiming s69 court interest...have we a mistake in our advice/threads/forms... this is the 4th one of recent....:noidea:

  • I agree 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The maximum amount that you can negotiate for is the full amount stated in your claim including all costs – claim fee, hearing fee.
It's a shame that you didn't claim interest – was there any reason for this?

Their no admission of liability is standard and totally irrelevant.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah okay, in that case I may just accept the settlement and let the court now.

The main reason I hadn't claimed interest was because of religion, however after 2 years of this case and much research I found in this matter it would be fine to claim. But no regrets, the whole process has taught me a lot.

Also as there is no confidentiality clause, would it be helpful if I posted the settlement email?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Get the money first – then post up would have you want.

We have had a number of people who have felt restricted by religious principles from claiming interest. Sometimes those people have been prepared to claim interest and to give it to us by way of a donation.
As you're probably aware, we don't charge anybody anything. We don't get paid – we are all volunteers and we simply rely on the goodwill of the people we help.

In anticipation – well done on your success. What a nuisance these people articles you so much difficulty.

I hope at the very least that you have learnt enough to be able to embark on immediate action whenever these kind of people get in your way future. And of course we are always here to help you – don't forget

  • I agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...