Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • UK citizens will be subject to the same rules as other Third Country Nationals. Keir Starmer to warn of 'major disruption' risk ahead of new UK-EU border checks | ITV News WWW.ITV.COM Ministers will announce measures to try to blunt the impact of the changes, writes ITV News Deputy Political Editor Anushka Asthana. | ITV National...  
    • Oh I see! thats confusing, for some reason the terms and conditions that Evri posted in that threads witness statement are slightly different than the t&cs on packlinks website. Their one says enter into a contract with the transport agency, but the website one says enter into a contract with paclink. via website: (c) Each User will enter into a contract with Packlink for the delivery of its Goods through the chosen Transport Agency. via evri witness statement in that thread: (c) Each User shall then enter into its own contract with the chosen Transport Agency. Packlink does not have any control over, and disclaims all liability that may arise in contracts between a User and a Transport Agency I read your post at #251, so I should use the second one (and changing the screenshot in the court bundle), since I am saying I have a contract with Evri? Is that correct EDIT: Oh I understand the rest of your conversation. you're saying if I was to do this i would have to fully adjust my ws to use the consumer rights act instead of rights of third parties. In that case should I just edit the terms and stick with the third parties plan?. And potentially if needed just bring up the CRA in the hearing, as you guys did in that thread  
    • First, those are the wrong terms,  read posts 240-250 of the thread ive linked to Second donough v stevenson should be more expanded. You should make refernece to the three fold duty of care test as well. Use below as guidance: The Defendant failed its duty of care to the Claimant. As found in Donoghue v Stevenson negligence is distinct and separate to any breach of contract. Furthermore, as held in the same case there need not be a contract between the Claimant and the Defendant for a duty to be established, which in the case of the Claimant on this occasion is the Defendant’s duty of care to the Claimant’s parcel whilst it is in their possession. By losing the Claimant’s parcel the Defendant has acted negligently and breached this duty of care. As such the Claimant avers that even if it is found that the Defendant not be liable in other ways, by means of breach of contract, should the court find there is no contract between Claimant and Defendant, the Claimant would still have rise to a claim on the grounds of the Defendant’s negligence and breach of duty of care to his parcel whilst it was in the Defendant’s possession, as there need not be a contract to give rise to a claim for breach of duty of care.  The court’s attention is further drawn to Caparo Industries plc v Dickman (1990), 2 AC 605 in which a three fold test was used to determine if a duty of care existed. The test required that: (i) Harm must be a reasonably foreseeable result of the defendant’s conduct; (ii) A relationship of proximity must exist and (iii) It must be fair, just and reasonable to impose liability.  
    • Thank you. here's the changes I made 1) removed indexed statement of truth 2) added donough v Stevenson in paragraph 40, just under the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 paragraph about reasonable care and skill. i'm assuming this is a good place for it? 3) reworded paragraph 16 (now paragraph 12), and moved the t&cs paragraphs below it then. unless I understood you wrong it seems to fit well. or did you want me to remove the t&cs paragraphs entirely? attached is the updated draft, and thanks again for the help. WS and court bundle-1 fourth draft redacted.pdf
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Western Circle Claimform - old PDL


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 971 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

I have received an email from Western Circle (Cashfloat loan in default as above) stating that in the next 2 days i will receive paperwork in the post as legal proceedings have been initiated. They claim i can set an arrangement for repayment if i fill in a N9A admission form that i will receive shortly?

Do i fill in the form once i get it for an offer of payment?

 

Thanks G

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 66
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

no as you'll get an automatic CCJ if you do.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

get on what?

 

you should be ignoring bouncing and blocking emails.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry for the confusion dx - i mean get on the advise from the thread you attached?

 

I am bit confused as to where the CCA request is going - i assume its going to Western circle as they are named on the default on the credit file (Cashflaot are PDL).

 

I cant send a CPR as i have logged into the loan account recently!!

I assume that i now wait for the county court letter to arrive and then pop on to MCOL and acknowledge the claim?

 

Thanks G

Link to post
Share on other sites

i simply posted a link to that thread as an example of someone else that is a few weeks ahead of you if you DO, get a claimform.

not anything you NEED to do now.

 

and ofcourse they must 1st abide by the pre action protocol and send a letter of claim by royal mail yet..:pound:

 

a court claim could be months away IF at ALL>

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your time and advice dx its very much appreciated. sometimes I get a panic on and think everything is going to happen all at once. In just need to take a step back and soak everything in 🤔

 

Thanks again dx

 

G

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi I have received a County Court claim from Western Circle for the PDL from Cashflow (I believe they are in the same department?). I have got a CCA running to Western Circle is that correct or should it go to Cashflow? estern circle are sgowing on my credit file as the default notice!!

I have also completed the MCOL form and AOC has been confirmed.

 

Name of the Claimant - Western Circle LTD

 

Date of issue – 29 July 2021 

Date to acknowledge = 2 Aug 

date to submit defence = 30 Aug ?

 

Particulars of claim:

 

1.The claimant is a lender providing short term finance to consumers under the consumer credit act 1974. On 05-03-2020 the parties entered into an agreement whereby the defendant borrowed the sum of £400 to be repaid in 3 monthly instalments at the agreed contractual daily interest rate of 0.74%, capped at 100% of the loan value

 

Despite extensive chasing, the defendant failed to pay their loan in full and interest and costs have been incurred

 

The claimant therefore claims:

 

1, £400 being the amount loaned

2, £400 being interest made up of the date of this claim.

3, -£192.19 being amount paid.

 

What is the total value of the claim? £677.81

 

Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol)
 

Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred
 

Did you inform the claimant of your change of address?  ?

 

 

Is the claim for a current account (Overdraft) or credit/loan account or mobile phone account? -  PDL

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? - After

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. - OC 

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? N/A 

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? - No

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? - no only email stating the account could go into default 

 

Why did you cease payments? - Got into financial difficulties due to gambling addiction and numerous other loans outstanding.

 

What was the date of your last payment? 05/03/20

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? - no 

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management - no

 

 

thanks G

 

I have checked on Experian and there is a default mark against the account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ive created a new thread for this.

 

can you give us the total for the claim you missed out one of the questions.

 

and don't forget the CPR as with your other court thread

or as the thread already linked above.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok dx thanks will get the COR sent as well.

 

The claimant therefore claims:

 

1, £400 being the amount loaned

2, £400 being interest made up of the date of this claim.

3, -£192.19 being amount paid.

 

Amount claimed:

£607.81

court fee £70

total claim: £677.81

 

Thanks G

 

Hi Sorry looked everywhere for the CPR for to send but cant trace it in the library?

 

Thanks G

Link to post
Share on other sites

eh?

 

its in the thread in post 2

which is why i put the link up to it to follow that thread.....................

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

did you send a CCA request before you got the claimform...you were going too?
 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi hope everyone is ok. I have drafted a defence below that is due to be submitted by end of play tomorrow any thoughts will be very much appreciated.

 

 

Particulars of Claim for Reference only

 

1.The claimant is a lender providing short term finance to consumers under the consumer credit act 1974. On 05-03-2020 the parties entered into an agreement whereby the defendant borrowed the sum of £400 to be repaid in 3 monthly instalments at the agreed contractual daily interest rate of 0.74%, capped at 100% of the loan value

 

2. Despite extensive chasing, the defendant failed to pay their loan in full and interest and costs have been incurred

 

 

 

The claimant therefore claims:

 

1, £400 being the amount loaned

2, £400 being interest made up of the date of this claim.

3, -£192.19 being amount paid.

 

What is the total value of the claim? £677.81

 

 

 

 

Defence

 

The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

1. The Claimant has not complied with paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) Failed to serve a letter of claim pre claim pursuant to PAPDC changes of the 1st October 2017.It is respectfully requested that the court take this into consideration pursuant to 7.1 PAPDC.

2. Paragraph 1 admitted .The defendant admits entering into a short term Pay Day Loan agreement for the sum of £400.00 to be paid in 3 monthly instalments . It is denied I failed to abide by the Terms and Conditions of the agreement.

 

3. The defendant  was placed on to furlough in March 2020 and was unable to meet the contractual 3 payments.

The claimant rejected a request for assistance during the ongoing Covid pandemic pursuant to the UK Government Legislation at which time I was placed on Furlough by my Employer.

 

4.The Claimant did not serve a Default Notice pursuant to sec87 (1) of the CCA1974. 

 

5 I have requested a copy of the agreement pursuant to section 77 of the CCA 1974.

 

Need for default notice.

 

(1)Service of a notice on the debtor or hirer in accordance with section 88 (a “default notice ”) is necessary before the creditor or owner can become entitled, by reason of any breach by the debtor or hirer of a regulated agreement,—

(a) to terminate the agreement, or

(b) to demand earlier payment of any sum

 

6. The claim is disputed with regards to the Defendant owing the amount of monies stated to the Claimant and the Claimant is put to strict proof to:

 

(a) show and evidence how the defendant entered into the agreement:

(b) show how the claimant has reached the amount claimed for;

(c) show how the claimant assisted during the pandemic and its response to my request;

(d) show and evidence how the breach occurred and a valid Default Notice was issued,

 

7. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the full correct amount of money is owed.

 

8.By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

 

 
 
Link to post
Share on other sites

If you could confirm the questions below you missed off from your post #8.

 

Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) 
 

Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred 
 

Did you inform the claimant of your change of address?  ?

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the reply Andy.

 

Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? Not as far as I am aware can’t find any letters from Westcroft 

Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred No change of address.

 

Thanks G

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It wouldn't of come from Westcot...they don't do court.....it would have come from  EWestern Circle LTD /  Solicitors named on the claim form?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will check it shortly.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Defence amended above.

 

Point 5 has been added....

 

5 I have requested a copy of the agreement pursuant to section 77 of the CCA 1974.

 

You must action this today without fail.....or otherwise remove it from the defence.

 

 

 

Andy

 

 

 

 

.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

:yo: Retain proof of   postage for the CCA request.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I have received Notice of Proposed Allocation to the Small Claims Track is this the normal next approach? It is asking me to complete and return the form.

Question A1:  Do you agree tot his case being referred to the Small Claims Mediation Service?  I take it i enter yes to give me the option of mediation?

 

Any assistance will be appreciated.

 

Thanks G

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...