Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Is the letter headed Letter of Claim/before Claim or similar? If not, it sounds like more of the threatogram chain. If you're not sure, post up an anonymised copy of the letter and we'll check. HB
    • So guess what, we have received a final demand letter for £100. It states if payment is not made by 11/06 they will have no option but to forward the case to their litigation dept with a view to commence County Court Proceedings. So just wondering if anyone has any advice. Do we ignore this? or do we need to take action? Thanks 
    • hi dx, thanks for helping just re-reading everything this morning and I must have missed this one from uncle in his thread "What you should not do, is not contact the Banks and simply default on payments. "  are you in disagreement with this based on your last sentence?
    • Thanks for the reply and clarification, that might just explain why in my case contact has pretty much ceased. Though with such companies it doesn't mean they won't ever threaten to return to court as a tool to force one's hand if they feel they are not self informed on their chances etc.  But concerning how last year they tried to use the CCJ to get a charging order and the court granted an intirum order on our mortgage using the CCJ that would have been a good 2-3 months beyond the 6 years, should the court not have checked the age of the CCJ in the first case or would they always grant an interim order simply off the back of a CCJ being produced without even checking the age of it?.  Had I not defended that action at the time they may well have got a default using a CCJ older than 6 years which could be a concern going forwards. At the time when I contacted the court to question the paperwork for a final order application the clerk suggested people don't get informed when companies apply for interim charging orders, they are automatic if a claimant has a CCJ and people only get contacted once a date for a final order application goes through. kind of begs the question if such companies can continue a seemingly backdoor method to attempt default action if un-defended if the initial application doesn't need to check the age of a CCJ?.
    • Hello!  Wondering if someone can help with this.  I suspect not but worth a go.  I appreciate the "contract is with the seller" line, which is what Evri has fed me but wanted to see if someone with experience in these things could suggest anything else I could do here.  I appreciate there are many topics about lost parcels - My parcels weren't lost, until the driver walked up to my door with them and then decided to make them lost/stolen... I'll summarise what has happened.  Wednesday of last week - Evri delivery driver stole / walked off with 3 of my parcels.  -  Arrived outside my properly, took photos (3 separate photos as its 3 separate deliveries) of the tops of the parcels (pointlessly zoomed in on just the labels, couldn't see anything else, other than a small piece of the pavement and a little weed, which doubly confirms it was outside my door as I can see the same plant), marked the order as delivered and walked off with them.  He's marked on the Evri GPS marked that he was outside.   -  3 different deliveries, from the same company (same boxes etc.), but 3 separate tracking numbers. -  Went through the Evri bot which opened a case on each tracking number.  I then phoned them and left a voicemail explaining what had happened. -  24 hours later had a canned response asking me if the packages had turned up and to check around etc..  I responded explaining again what happened and that they've definitely been taken. -  4 days later,  this morning, I get a response telling me to ask the merchant to refund me. I've responded to this message with a long email, repeating what I said, that I believe the driver has stolen these packages and that he took those suspicious top down shots of the packages, marked them as delivered without ringing or knocking etc.  I've said that I expect them to investigate further, but I gather they won't. In my several messages to them initially and later, I told them I don't care about a refund and wanted the parcels.  They contain some sentimental stuff, nothing of high monetary value, hence me going to this trouble.  I only paid £25 for the contents. I did contact the merchant when this first happened and they asked me to wait a few days.  They ended up refunding me despite me asking them not to and that I wanted them to escalate it with Evri because this appears to be a case of theft.  They didn't seem bothered - Refunded me and told me to go back to Evri and escalate it with them? So - Is there any way to compel Evri to conduct a proper investigation with this driver?  Search for my parcels? I have quite a lot of deliveries handled by Evri (not out of choice) - They used to have a fantastic chap and I rarely had any issues.  He has been replaced by a new guy and I believe the route is handled by this same guy who I believe has taken my packages.  Naturally, I fear this is going to happen again in the future if no investigation occurs. Appreciate any assistance - Thanks for reading. Al.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6387 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Ok, so I moved out of my flat a week on Friday and I'm so glad to be rid of my horrible Landlady, but now she's refusing to pay me back my deposit. Here is the e-mail she sent me and my comments in red....

 

"Thankyou for your e mail. I have now had a good look at the property and I think you will be owing me money rather than me giving you any deposit back due to the following;

-Iron burn on lounge carpet replacement needed.Definately there when I moved in, didn't notice for a couple of weeks as its in the corner of the room.

-Fire surround cracked and replacement needed or some one in to fix it. I have already spoken to her about this. This occured when the fire wasn't working properly so we had to turn the ignition loads of times to get it to work which in turn created a crack in the plastic behind the ignition dial (I have pictures)

-Gas cooker not cleaned enough so cleaners will be brought in. Fair enough, an hours work tops so £10

-Microwave interior paint missing from below the circular turntable.This is fair wear and tear when I cleaned out the mircowave regularly the paint came off in flakes.

-Present shower curtain left in property was broken on the first eyelet, the original shower curtain was badly stained and replacement needed. I am happy to replace, as I have another one spare.

-Bedroom 2 carpet badly stained and collection of rubbish left under bed so cleaner needed. Flat mates room, will clear rubbish myself, but how much rubbish can there be under a divan bed? £50 approx for carpet to be cleaned.

-Bedroom 1 carpet iron mark on the carpet and replacement needed. Will pay for replacement carpet, 'like for like' £150 (if carpet costs £300, calc from ARLA)

-Dehumidifier caster wheels missing.£10 for missing wheels

-A gas card meter fitted to the gas meter which is against the tenancy agreement, presently £15.08 owing on the meter. Nothing in tenancy agreement, will pay for £15.08, gas meter can be removed for free.

So a lot of work needed to get the flat back to the standard that it was when you first rented it."

 

So thats that, altogether it comes to about £235 and my deposit was £425. When I left the flat I went back and cleaned it from top to bottom and have photos to prove how clean it was (struggled to get oven to her standards though). When we moved in we had an inventory list of items but no mention of state of carpets or walls etc.

 

During my time their the flat was constantly damp, with some of the walls covered in mould, and some of my shoes in the wardrobe and pictures on the window sill have gone mouldy.

 

Any advise on what I could do would be appreciated.

 

Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Couple of Q's

 

was it a joint tennancy? and how many people?

 

did you both (or more than 2) pay deposits?

 

has your flatmate(s) got their deposit back?

 

She has to prove costs to her and as you said only replace like for like - simply send a letter requesting the full deposit back (in writing sent recorded delivery) and put in letter if full deposit isn't returned you want receipts/invoices for work done. Give a deadline and then LBA and then courts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Blacksheep1979, Thanks for yout reply, In response to your questions,

 

1) Yes it was a joint tenancy with one other person.

 

2) The other tenant moved out a while before me so I have her £200 towards the deposit, so anything I get will be mine.

 

3) so no she hasn't recieved anything either.

 

Will do as you say, but do you think all the comments I've written are fair and do you think I should mention my possessions that were ruined because of the damp in the flat.

 

Also at the start of the tenancy, the landlord asked me to use the dehumidifier she provided (which I did nearly everyday) and that it would only cost as much as a light bulb which I have since found out probably isn't true, as most electronic devices powered by a motor use quite a lot of electricity, do you think I should mention this?

 

Thanks again!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you ever mention the damp to the landlord - if you didn't then they weren't given the option to remedy the situation before it did any damage.

 

If the inventory didn't mention condition of any of the carpets etc when you moved in and or you didn't agree to the condition of items on that list then its not really relevant.

 

as to your other points

 

microwave - fair wear and tear - yes

shower curtain - would say that s fair wear and tear, especially if the house is damp

 

 

The rest I wouldn't admit to - and can I ask how you managed to get iron marks on your carpet?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again blacksheep.

 

I mentioned the damp to the landlord loads of times and she was definately aware before we moved in as she gave us a dehumidifier.

 

The only thing I've admitted to is the iron mark on the bedroom carpet, as I don't want to lie, but it ****es me off that a stupid little mistake can cost so much.

 

Basically I was ironing (on a ironing board) and didn't put the iron down properly and it fell off and landed face down, and even though it was only for a couple of seconds theres a huge mark.:eek::(

 

So do you think I could claim compensation for the things the damp have ruined?

 

Also I'm concerned that she may try to sue me before I can sue her (if it comes to that) or counter sue as she reckons I'll owe her money.:evil:

Link to post
Share on other sites

She more than likely won't sue as if she has any sense she'll know it'll get thrown out and your costs (for travel etc) will have to be met. You should have called one of the council agencies to confirm the damp and you would have been able to claim a percentage of the rent back (depending on severity of damp). If you put it to the landlord that as she didn't fix the damp on numerous occasions it was reported and due to this you have suffered damage to property and the extra expense of running a dehumidifier this more than offsets any claim she has to any deposit monies and so you expect it all back in full.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...