Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Replying to above  this was on the day that two store detectives approached me and my friend and took us into the back room and spoke to us when they explained they have been watching
    • as my learned friend above...and.. sadly because just like DCA's and initially yourself in this case, you believed they have some magical powers ...they DON'T. 85% of people blindly pay DCA's cause they know no better and think they are BAILIFFS. only the RETAILER can ever do court and none have done this on a silly member of joe public that did something stupid since the infamous 2012 Oxford case on retail loss. BAILIFFS can only ever be involved after you've been to court and lost a CCJ, fat chance re above... and anyway, no BAILIFF has any right of forced entry anyway on consumer debts even with a judgement so......... stop panicking and thinking everything that doesn't apply.. forget about them but p'haps a confidential GP visit might be a very good move... what slightly concerns me more here is:  who are 'them' that told you they'd reviewed a week of CCTV and come up with several shoplifting instances over that time amounting to the above? have you directly contacted or had contact from Sainsbury's? and know they HAVE done this? or is this DWF willy waving and they tricked you into  admitting several previous successful thefts... this is not the norm...  dx      
    • next step then await the N157 from her local court giving the time and date of a future hearing some month in the future. now she MUST file a witness statement 14 days (typically) to both the court and kearns .  so cant allow to much of a time lag before you are aware of that and get her WS done. wack us up 2 multipage pdf files please  one of what they returned for the CRP reply . and one for everything they sent back in 2022 you've found.  we do not need statements. ideally it would be nice to see their WS before hers is finally filed. dx  
    • Another interesting article in the Grauniad - Counterfeit barcode stamps furore carries echoes of Horizon scandal | Consumer affairs | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Royal Mail admits its scanners ‘make mistakes’ but stands by the process it uses to detect fakes as ‘robust’  
    • DWF can't do anything as they act for a client. In this case, Sainsbury's. Sainsbury's could take you to court and ATTEMPT to get a CCJ but it's unlikely. They had no interest in dealing with you at the time. All DWF can do is send out pointless threatograms. They'll threaten to divert an Iranian drone to your house if you don't pay. However, they can't attempt to get a CCJ against you. IGNORE THEM. It's more important now to understand why you were allegedly shoplifting, and you should speak with your GP and try and get yourself signposted to the support that's available.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

BCM Prestige Car Sales - Car bought on MotoNovo finance with issues


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1181 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Quote

Bit of a long one... We bought a used car on finance in dec2019, we went into lockdown not long after so didn't use the car for a few months, when we came to use it in the summer the aircon didn't work and a local garage found that the compressor was cracked and told us to take it back to the garage we bought it from. The retailer eventually agreed to fix it using 1000.00 from the warranty we bought and we had to pay 800.00 as they wanted to replace the whole aircon unit not just fix the broken part. They spent the next 3 months aug-oct waiting on parts etc then finally told us to come and get it it was ready-we drove to the garage an hour away from us and the car had smoke pouring out from under the bonnet and the controls for the radio no longer worked. They agreed to fix this and deliver the car back once this was done. We're now in Feb and we still don't have a car! The garage are refusing to fix the issues they caused or bring the car back and we have no way of going there to collect it, the finance company have basically refused our complaint saying its tough 🙄 and we still need to make the payments, we've complained to the ombudsman who have said its a 4-6month wait for them to look into it and they have contacted the garage to give us a resolution but they have 8 weeks to respond-it's been 3 weeks and we haven't heard anything from them, we're really stumped with what else we can do, we're paying for a car and we don't know exactly where it is, if it's being stored properly and started regularly. Any advice would be greatly appreciated 😁

 

Bit of a long one...
We bought a used car on finance in dec2019,
we went into lockdown not long after so didn't use the car for a few months,

when we came to use it in the summer the aircon didn't work and a local garage found that the compressor was cracked and told us to take it back to the garage we bought it from.

The retailer eventually agreed to fix it using 1000.00 from the warranty we bought and we had to pay 800.00 as they wanted to replace the whole aircon unit not just fix the broken part.

They spent the next 3 months aug-oct waiting on parts etc then finally told us to come and get it it was ready-we drove to the garage an hour away from us and the car had smoke pouring out from under the bonnet and the controls for the radio no longer worked.

They agreed to fix this and deliver the car back once this was done.
We're now in Feb and we still don't have a car!

The garage are refusing to fix the issues they caused or bring the car back and we have no way of going there to collect it,

the finance company have basically refused our complaint saying its tough 🙄 and we still need to make the payments,

we've complained to the ombudsman who have said its a 4-6month wait for them to look into it and they have contacted the garage to give us a resolution but they have 8 weeks to respond-it's been 3 weeks and we haven't heard anything from them,

we're really stumped with what else we can do,

we're paying for a car and we don't know exactly where it is, if it's being stored properly and started regularly.

Any advice would be greatly appreciated 😁

Edited by BankFodder
Restructured post to make it readable
Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome to the forum.

You posted your story in a long solid block of text and that makes it very difficult for people to follow especially when they are using the small screen such as a telephone.

Please will you help us in future by presenting your story and any responses properly spaced and punctuated.

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please can you tell us the name of the dealer and the name of the finance company

Link to post
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • BankFodder changed the title to BCM Prestige Car Sales - Car bought on MotoNovo finance with issues

How long have you not had the car? Also you haven't told us the price you paid for it. Maybe the tell us the make and model as well and the mileage please.

Our preferred way of dealing this would be to begin a county court claim. However you have put this into the hands of an ombudsman and this means that if you decide to take legal action then the ombudsman would not be prepared to continue with the complaint any more.

If you wanted to take legal action then we would help you and support you away including helping you to draft the documents.

It seems to me that you have been fundamentally deprived of the entire purpose of the contract – you have lost the use of your car. Also you have been conned into paying money apparently towards warranty when in fact you have statutory rights under the Consumer Rights Act which would have required the dealer to pay for any repairs.

You need to understand that by and large warranties are a con and are used as a distraction in order to divert you from the fact that you have ample statutory rights.
Do not be swayed by warranties in future.

What is the value of the car?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, was the finance in the form of a loan or was it a hire purchase?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, but I've already restructured one of your long posts.

Please will you post properly spaced and punctuated.

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

you should not be charged anything for any extra warranty!!

neither £1000 under the warranty for a repair

 

go get that money back

and the money for the unnecessary warranty

and tell motonova to do their job as the OWNER of the car properly.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

We are still waiting for you to repost your correctly structured post please.

After that, it will be your decision but frankly we would recommend that you withdraw from the ombudsman process and you begin a legal action.

I would propose that you recover full reimbursement of the price of the vehicle, your contributions to any repairs, the cost of any warranty you have bought, any interest payments et cetera that you have paid to the finance company.

If this interests you then please post your responses – in a way that they are fully accessible to people even with small screens.

Start reading around this forum about the steps involved in taking a small claim in the County Court.

It's very easy but it's worth knowing how to do it in advance.

You haven't addressed my question as to whether this was hire purchase

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, but please will you address the questions about the make and model and mileage et cetera.

It will be great if we could get the answers all at one go so that we can then start sorting it out for you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry again, I did write a reply-not sure what's happened to it. 

 

It's a Honda civic 63 plate

Mileage was 59k when we purchased it-not completely sure what it would be now as I haven't seen the car for 5 months and I have no idea if it's been driven. But I can get the mileage from the mot from July 20 if needed

 

The car was bought on hire purchase and the cost was 5279.00.

 

Thanks 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, so strictly speaking it belongs to the finance company.

Presumably you made a written complaint to the ombudsman. Maybe you would like to produce it here so we can have a look. PDF format please.

As I've said, the whole thing seems to have been mis-sold and you have been led by the nose and it's probably time to put a stop to it. I'm afraid that the ombudsman is very uncertain and limp wristed and very often tries to reach compromise arrangements – when in fact the rights of very clearly on your side.

You bought a vehicle which was not in satisfactory condition and so therefore the vehicle was sold to you in breach of the consumer rights act.

It was also sold to you in breach of your general contractual rights. Basically this means that if you have been substantially deprived of the benefit of the contract then you are entitled to treat the contract is terminated and sue for reimbursement.

Generally speaking you might only be entitled to reimbursement of a portion of your money on the basis that you have had some satisfactory use from it. Even though you didn't use the car, that was a matter for you and so it could be argued that you possibly had six months use out of it before the problems were discovered that by and large you should be entitled to everything.

You are absolutely wrong to be persuaded into buying a warranty. You already had sufficient rights under the consumer rights act if you only had thought to enforce them.

You seen already that the warranty that you paid good money for is a waste of time.

You will find that the dealer prefers that you have a warranty because the dealer has a duty to repair the car for you free of charge anyway but by persuading you to buy a warranty, the dealer has effectively managed to con you into paying for the repairs yourself and also the dealer has managed to con you into believing that you probably don't have any other rights.

So the dealer prefers you to buy warranty. Also, because the dealer knows that the ombudsman is a fairly easy touch and limp wristed, the dealer prefers that you go to the ombudsman rather than to the County Court. This is not to say that the ombudsman will reach a bad decision, but is more likely than not that the ombudsman will reach a compromise decision.

If you decide to stay with the ombudsman until you get the decision – whenever that is – then the ombudsman will provide a decision and it is up to you to accept it or not. If you don't accept it then you can still go ahead and take legal action. However, it's pretty amazing that you've been deprived the user your vehicle for over six months now and there doesn't seem to be any end to it.

You will have to make your own decision.

The advantage of the ombudsman is that it's free and if you lose you don't suffer any costs. On the other hand as you see is extremely time-consuming and the outcome is very unclear.

The advantage of the County Court system is that it is relatively quick – and it is likely to put pressure on the dealer and also in the finance company to act properly. However, there is a risk that you could lose the case although on the basis of what you have told us – it would be almost impossible to lose this one. In order to bring a Canticle action you will have to lay out the claim fee and also the hearing fee which for a case of this value could probably be about £300 or so. If you win you get it all back. If you lose then you get nothing and also you won't be to go back to the ombudsman.

I think you will have to think it over and if you want to bring a Canticle action and as I have said, we will help you all the way. It's very straightforward.
Read up the steps on bringing a Canticle action – including the business of sending a letter of claim to give them 14 days.

If you wanted, you could start the process on Monday. You would probably be suing the finance company as they are the people who have sold you the vehicle under the hire purchase agreement

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi thanks for the advice, the legal route is definitely something that we were considering, but we've never 'taken someone to court' and are completely clueless when it comes to the process. 

 

I will get a copy of the written complaint posted here by tomorrow and I will discuss with my partner when I finish work tonight and have a look at the links you've provided. 

 

Would it be helpful for you to see the final response we received from motonovo in regards to the complaint we made to them? 

 

Many thanks 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes please 

scan up to one multipage PDF all in/out comms with motonova.

read our upload guide carefully

 

most useless company if there ever was one 2nd only to Moneybarn in their exceptionally contemptuous way they treat customers 

no-one on any HP agreement should ever have to pay anything toward the upkeep of the car as it IS NOT YOURS. other than basic daily routine maintenance every owner would be expected too and SOME W&T issues  , though anything within the first year or two upon that front is extremely debatable it IS because of YOUR W&T not previous poor maintenance which ofcourse is not your problem.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You may not have taken anyone to court before – and most people who come onto this forum never have either.

However, it is very simple and you will acquire transferable skills so that you will then feel more confident about suing anybody else who gets in your way.

What is there not to like?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...