Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for your pointers - much appreciated. dx100uk - Apologies, my request wasn't for super urgent advice and I have limited online access due to my long working hours and caring obligations - the delay in my response doesn't arise in any way from disrespect or ingratitude. I will speak to her at the weekend and see if she will open up a bit more about this, and allow me to submit the subject access request you advise - the original creditor is 118 118 loans and from the letter I saw (which prompted the conversation and the information) the debt collection agency had bought the debt from 118 and were threatening enforcement which is when she has made a payment arrangement with them for an amount of £180 per month. It looks as if she queried matters at the time (so I wonder if I might with the FIO request get access to their investigation file?) - the letter they wrote said "The information that you provided has been carefully considered and reviewed. After all relevant enquiries were made it has been confirmed that there is not enough evidence present to conclusively prove that this application was fraudulent.  However, we have removed the interest as a gesture of goodwill. As a result of the findings, you will be held liable for the capital amount on the loan on the basis of the information found during the investigation and you will be pursued for repayment of the loan agreement executed on 2.11.2022 in accordance with Consumer Credit Act 1974"  The amount at that time was over £3600 in arrears, as no payments had been made on it since inception and I think she only found out about it when a default notice came in paper form. I'm a little reluctant to advise her to just stop paying, and would like to be able to form a view in relation to her position and options before unsetting the applecart - do you think this is reasonable? She is young and inexperienced with these things and getting into this situation has brought about a lot of shame regarding inability to sort things out/stand up for herself, which is one of the reasons I have only found out about this considerably later Thank you once again for your advice - it is very much appreciated.    
    • That's fine - I'm quite happy to attend court if necessary. The question was phrased in such a way that had I declined the 'consideration on the papers' option, I would have had to explain why I didn't think such consideration was appropriate, and since P2G appear to be relying on a single (arguably flawed) issue, I thought it might result in a speedier determination.
    • it was ordered in the retailers store  but your theory isnt relevant anyway, even if it fitted the case... the furniture is unfit for purpose within 30 days so consumer rights act overwrites any need to use 14 days contract law you refer too. dx  
    • Summary of the day from the Times. I wasn't watching for a couple of interesting bits like catching herself out with her own email. Post Office inquiry: Paula Vennells caught out by her own email — watch live ARCHIVE.PH archived 23 May 2024 11:57:02 UTC  
    • Frankly I think you should go to a hearing unless you feel especially nervous . If you have any worries then you should follow our link to find out about a county court familiarisation visit     You shouldn't forget that county Court judgements are very helpful but they are not binding. They are only persuasive.  It is difficult to see you losing but it might be better to be there in order to counter any arguments from the other side
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Erudio/Drydens SLC Loan CCJ - Advice Please - Set a Side claim proceeding.


owk
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 695 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Yes SLC had my old company HR letter in SAR and I’ve also got the emails from them saying it would be kept on file and processed when the baby was born. Erudio also has this as a copy. 

 

I rang SLC last week again to see why it didn’t ever happen. 

 

The failure on theor part to update my address - even though you can clearly see on my SAR that I called them led to me not ever receiving the N.o.a - hence the confusion with Erudio / Honours in 2014

Link to post
Share on other sites

I need them SLC to confirm that, they emailed to say they would keep my paperwork  had on file  - for me to give birth in December and start maternity leave.  My husband posted/ scanned over the new signed deferral form on my behalf to go with the letter from my employer.  This will be hard to prove I guess but he 100% did it. In fact I remember asking him in the hospital - it is clear. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Evening,

 

Would there be any reason why on Erudio N.O.A my SLC account number is completely different?  I have two other SLC account numbers as for some reason they had a duplicate account for me.. 

 

Is this the new master reference - if so why still call it SLC Account number on the Notice of Assignment ?

 

There is a long Erudio customer reference number on other paperwork, so its not that? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I’m not sure if I can prove this but it was 100 % true. Do you have any advice for me? I had to wait my December payslip - and it was probably faxed over, or posted. There is no way I could have that record now. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree it would often be in the comms sections but SLC did/ not do not record all comms and phonecalls.  I have evidence of this. 

 

I have two or three email conversations not recorded on my SAR, and I know during April May 2014 I would have called them trying to find out what was going on and asking who Erudio were etc.. I thought  they were a Link or Thesis and were all just trying to grab what they could. 
 

In May 2014 I must have rang Student Loan Company and it was then they set up a new  DD for what I now know to be Honours Student Loans only and I have a 334.00 payment which I must have believed were the  Erudio arrears leading up to that time. I was probably not even earning the threshold but was pleased to be back on track and not have Erudio on my case. 

 

I seem to remember I thought the Erudio chaos was dying down and SLC were servicing borrowers as before. 

 

I have 36 letters in my Erudio SAR - and nothing from them between  March 2014 - 2016 no statements no letters of arrears just a N.O.A with a dodgy assignment number which is nothing like my Student Loans 2 numbers, and no it wasn't the very long Erudio Master Reference! (Yes SLC  even had a duplicate account for me.) 

 

I think the absence of these letters mean an awful lot of non- compliance during that period by Erudio, I had no idea of my balance or status. 

 

I also have a request to Defer on SLC SAR  2015 with only the Honours Loan on it - so much for shared loans being processed by the SLC. 

 

I will see how I get on next week, I appreciate the interest you have shown, after 12,13 decent years of either payment or deferral with a reasonable company I wasn't expecting the might of Erudio.. I will have to accept my fate I am afraid.. 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes of course. I was  in touch with SLC yesterday  they have confirmed they have an open investigation running due to duplicate accounts and errors - they said the judge can call them! Not sure if he/she will do that... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi - it’s been 1 week  yesterday  since the court  hearing and I’ve still  had nothing in writing from the court.
I’ve rang the court - no answer - and I’ve had an email saying instructions would be sent out to me. 
I’m actually feeling pretty stressed out about it. 
It was set aside - but I need to provide a signed statement within 14 days. 


Drydens said something about costs at the end of the hearing - but I’m not exactly sure what was decided. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi .. It's been set aside

 

It was so frightening.. I was a nervous wreck. Thank you for your paragraph, I didn't have much time to speak in the hearing. 

 

All parties said they did not have my updated witness statement ( with results of my SLC SAR and bank statements - even though I hand delivered it to the court yesterday. The county  court has not been answering the) phones for two weeks so I had to go down there.

 

I spoke to a lovely man who said he would ensure it got into the right hands - but it didn't. 

 

I also emailed updated Witness Statement it to Drydens this am, and some of my evidence.

 

My gut feeling was the woman from Drydens was not being truthful when she said she did not have it. 

 

I need to submit a defence to the court and have 14 days I believe to do so, the call just finished - will I hear from the court?

 

The Judge wants to see a few clearly spaced out paragraphs and a signed witness statement.

 

Drydens  said something about costs, the Judge ask if I understood.. which I didn't, how will I know what's what - will I receive paperwork from the court do you think? 

 

I need to calm down from it all today but I am going to chase SLC tomorrow for the results of their investigation, apparently there is a special team from Erudio that they are working together on with SLC and they are in contact. 

 

I want them to confirm exactly how much has been paid and who to- (link, thesis SLC?)  I would be happy if based on the evidence Student Loan Company accept that mistakes have been made on their part, and put me back in deferral minus any arrears. I will fight this cause as I believe I have been wronged by poor adminat SLC and the devil that is Erudio. 

 

I do not want to have to deal with Drydens again, the CCJ has always been my major issue, as I have recently been made a Director of my husbands business and he would have gone nuts. 

 

I would like to be of help to other posters, but I am too scared to add any information today, the woman from Drydens was so mean. Thank you for your help, you have been very sceptical of my situation but I knew I have been wronged, bullied by Erudio and treated so very poorly by SLC.   I will of course be donating. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andy, I have a statement prepared - as I was assuming 14 days from hearing.. but is that posted... emailed... ?? 

 

I already sent updated witness statements in - with my evidence, which I’ve been told were given to the court usher - but all parties said they didn’t have them on the day. Do I change that?? Is there a certain format I need to follow? 
 

I’m going to chase SLC tomorrow who are investigating it with Erudio, I cannot imagine this will be concluded by next week. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry if confusing
 

 - It was a tele hearing  on 30th March. 
I was told in the hearing it was set aside - but the judge wanted a witness statement signed a few paragraphs - as he wasn’t going to read through all of my evidence?? 

I expected to receive written confirmation a few days later - but nothing.. I’ve chased the court who have said I will be sent info out and to ring them if I don’t understand. 
I will redact and post statement drafted first thing -

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, please see attached, still nothing from the court. I'm going to ring again this pm, but I'm working on Tuesday of next week to send over my witness statement. Possibly even Monday - as Tuesday is 14 days since the hearing. 

 

I have chased SLC investigation today- no timescales for when they will come back to me. 

 

I have said I will speak to Erudio, but my initial complaint is still with SLC. 

 

Thank you for looking into this for me. 

 

2020-11-16 Defendants WS.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks  I’ve still had nothing from the court... re exactly what they wanted from me. 
What is the usual protocol after I sent this in? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good morning All, the 14 days ( since the hearing) are up tomorrow and I’ve still had no paperwork from the court? 
I’ve left a voicemail and emailed.

 
How do they need to receive my witness statement, I was thinking of hand delivering it.   

The Judge said signed?  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just got home to a letter from court saying set aside and I am to file a properly pleaded defence supported by a statement of truth dated and signed by me by 4pm 13.04.21. 
 

Hello, I’m really sorry - just want to get this right, which one am I using? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • AndyOrch changed the title to Erudio/ Drydens Fairfax CCJ - Advice Please - Set a Side claim proceeding.

I emailed  and hand delivered a signed copy of my statement to the court yesterday. I also emailed a copy of it to Erudio and Dryden. 
keep you posted! 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Erudio/Drydens SLC Loan CCJ - Advice Please - Set a Side claim proceeding.

Hi - 

 

Just a quick update, I hand delivered a signed witness statement and the court have confirmed they have received it. 

 

I have not heard from Drydens, Erudio or SLC yet. Keep you posted....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks Andy, 

 

I also have an open Investigation running with SLC - but hear nothing unless I call them, it gets escalated, then goes round in a loop. This has been happening since Feb...

SLC did say they are communicating with a third party on behalf of Erudio - unsure what this all means. I get told completely different things everytime I call SLC. 

 

I had requested a new SAR from Erudio on 30/03, as I would like to see what they are doing about this in general, and if they are liaising with SLC

 

I've had an email from Erudio - but nothing else... should I continue to pursue this? Or just hang on.. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...