Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Its just a case against a parcel delivery firm where parcel lost and a judge didnt agree that they were liable for more then insurance ws.   However my question is more about what the wording on the points of the order says which I copied above
    • Hi. I think we may need to know more about what has happened so far please, if you're able to tell us. HB
    • hi all, any feedback on the WS / bundle and the packlink invoice would be appreciated - they are attached in post #214 above. If no further amends are needed, please let me know. For reference, the date for filing the bundle is 24th May at the latest - this is 14 days before the hearing date of 7th June.
    • Hello, I'm wondering if someone can advise me on something. I'm appealing an order and have been asked to submit an appeal bundle and the below points are required to be included: 1) transcript of the judgment of the lower court on other record of reasons.  2) Statement of case. I'm wondering if anyone knows that "on other record of reasons" means. Also for statement of case would it just be a long document covering the reason for the claim, the findings of the lower court, why it was wrong and what I seek instead?   Thanks,
    • Hello, Thanks for the advice. I asserted my rights to reject and they accepted it and said they will refund me the full amount.  My question now is how long do they usually take to collect the vehicle? I've made it clear that I'm available for them to collect it whenever and I've been told its been passed on to the collections team. I chased it up today as its also raining heavily at the moment.  I just wondered if anyone had any experience on how long they usually take to collect? I'd obviously like it collected as soon as possible as I need to purchase another car.  Is it likely they will drag on the process of collection and what can I do if they do?  Thanks!
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

SCM and claims beyond 6 years / limitations act 1980


quincy
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6164 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I tried to call SCM today and spoke to the same helpful (?) person who always seems to answer my calls (at least they've removed him from the greeting message).

I was asking as to why I’ve not received any documents at all despite us meeting in court next Tuesday.

 

I was told that Mr Thomas was too busy to speak and the department dealing with these cases was also too busy - i asked that a message be left for them to call back. When i explained it was due lack of any documents from LLoyds/SCM he said it's "probably because we don't intend to rely on any - we don't need to".

 

Why would they not need documents?

 

They haven't called back by the way - and i'm not going to chase them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Received a letter from SCM today with a copy of their letter to the court and a cheque. I'll post full info overnight - but in brief, the cheque is in full settlement of my claim - I think!

 

Should it have included the Data Protection Act fee?

 

Also as most of my charges are over 6 years old the interest is not a small amount unless I’ve made a large mistake with the spreadsheet!

 

Can someone please confirm that, for example a charge for

£7 levied to me on 23/04/1996 with that being 4070 days since - would have accrued £6.27 interest? (At 8% apr)

They’ve given me approx £60 in total for £787 of charges using 8% for 336 days (where 336 came from I’ve no idea!)

 

So the total is (again approx - I’ll correct this later) £987 when I’m thinking it should have been around £1400 Inc court fee.

 

The other letter is to the court saying they have settled and they will not be attending the court on Tuesday.

I’ve tried to call them all afternoon but they're "too busy" and no- one called back.

 

As I said I’ll post proper numbers and the letters in a few hours (on a night shift tonight).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok - I’m still awake! Here’s the first letter from SCM:

 

We refer to the Small claims hearing due to be heard on 19th June and confirm that our client has advised us they will be settling the above claim in full.

 

In light of this we enclose our clients; cheque in the sum of £987.74 in settlement of this claim together with a copy of our letter sent to the court for your information.

 

Please be advised that by our client settling this claim is not to be treated in any way as an admission of liability. This is merely an attempt to resolve the matter amicably between the parties concerned.

 

We therefore trust you will write to the court to confirm our claim has been settled and provide this office with a copy for our records.

 

---------------------------------------------------

The next letter (to the court) reads:

 

We refer to the hearing due to be heard June 19th.

 

Our client has advised that in order to avoid further costs in this matter they will be settling the claimant’s claim in full, and in the circumstances we would ask for the hearing to be vacated.

 

With this in mind a personal cheque has been sent to the claimant for £987.74 which is calculated as follows:

 

Amount of claim £847.26

Court fee £ 80

Interest at 8% (£0.18 pence *336 days) £60.48

 

Total £987.74

 

 

In light of the above our client will not be represented at the small claims hearing and we would respectfully request these proceedings be marked as settled.

 

We enclose copies etc etc

 

 

----------------------------------------------------------

The claim before interest was for £784.50

Plus the court fee £80

And Data Protection Act fee?

And interest which I calculated to be £531.84 so far (bearing in mind the fees started back in 1996).

 

Have I made a big mistake in the interest (it’s very possible!) Where does 336 days come from?

 

What do you guys think?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks quite good,but they seem to be trying it on still with the interest,can you take advice on your interest calculation? Really depends on if your happy with the amount (or is that blasphemy) Well done you though after all this is Lloyds we're talking about and more than 6 years.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally I would accept. 8% is always at the judge's discretion. If you feel you are entitled to the correct amount of interest and wish to continue, I'm happy to check over your figures.

 

Did you send a breakdown of the figures and interest? What was on your claim? Please send your schedule to me at [email protected] if you like and I'll take a look.

[

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...