Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • In my experience (not with car payments) but with many other things, my partner has been ill and signed off in the past and we have been unable to meet various commitments.  Naturally if you ring the call centre they are going to fob you off and tell you you must pay, that's why that never ever works. I would obtain a note from her GP listing all her health issues plus medications plus side effects, then write to the finance company with a copy of it, explaining the situation, as you have here, asking for a payment holiday. Perhaps mention that the car is very much needed for hospital appointments etc. It's likely the finance company would rather you pay till term end than, chase you for money they will never see, and sell the car at auction for a loss,  You can search some of my threads going back years, advising people to do this for Council Tax, Tax Credits, HMRC, Even a solicitors company and it always works, because contrary to popular belief people are reasonable.
    • Sorry, I haven't ever seen one of these agreements. Read it all and look out for anything that says when she can withdraw and when she is committed to go ahead. If it isn't clear she may need to call the housing provider and simply say what you posted here, she doesn't want to go ahead and how does she withdraw her swap application?
    • Thank you! Your head is like a power bank of knowledge.  Her health issues are short term, due to a relationship breakdown she took it pretty hard and has been signed off work on medication for 3 months. She only started her job in February 24 so does not qualify for any occupational sick benefits, which is where the ssp only comes in. (You will see me posting a few things over the coming days, whilst I try and sort some things for her)  I sat with her last night relaying all this back and she does want to work out a plan, she was ready to propose £100 for the next 3 months and then an additional £70 per month onto of her contractual to "catch up" but Money247 rejecting the payment holiday and demanding £200 thew her, which is why I came on here.   
    • I've looked at your case specifically more.   Term 8bii reads " when, in accordance with instructions from the Customer or the Consignee, the Consignment is left in a safe place" Their terms choose to not define safe, so they are put to proof that the location is safe. If your property opens onto a street its a simple thing of putting a google earth image and pointing out that its not a safe place
    • New rules and higher rates resulted in a jump in the number of savers opening accounts at the start of this year's Isa season.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Lloyds tsb have filed a defence ***WON***


jo1006
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6267 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 189
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

This is a very toughened up version of the original order.

 

What do you mean Bank fodder?

Has this been issued to loads of folks and has it been refined since the first issue?

Jo:-?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Congrats to all who have received it anyway. And please keep everything crossed for us.:(

 

Could I just ask - we have included the original schedule of charges which we sent along with the early correspondance, but the interest will have increased since then. Do we print off a new one? Also, should we include statements and charges since July 06? The charges since then add up to almost £1000. (its damned ludicrous - how do they expect us to be debt free when they're adding these appallingly huge charges on?):-x:-x

We have everything ready to deliver on Monday. We are sending the [problem] copy of our court bundle by next day registered post, so hopefully we will be able to contact them on Wednesday to ask where theirs is!!

Say a prayer for us everyone.

Mick and Jo

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi M&J,

 

No need to update your schedule - the interest accrues automatically by the daily rate specified in your POC. The schedule you submit in your bundle should read the same as it did when you filed the claim.

 

Unfortunately you can't add more charges on at this stage without a formal application to the court. As you're well past the allocation stage, thats probably not reccomended as for a start it'll cost you £35 which is non-refundable, plus there's the possibility you'll have to attend an application hearing and it would inevitabily delay the whole process.

 

When your offered settlement, its worth requesting that the charges incurred since the date of issue are also included in it, although they're under no obligation to agree and on past evidence probably won't. If not, you'll just have to start the process again - as I did, hence the 'here we go again' thread.

 

Stick with it - your very nearly there!

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys,

well, they've gone. Two court bundles sent first class, next day recorded delivery. Jeez..we needed a second mortgage just to pay for the postage! I'm surprised that the Royal Mail aren't sunning themselves in St Tropez the amount it costs to post parcels nowadays!!

 

But, they've gone!!

We'll ring [problem] tomorrow afternoon to enquire after theirs, which should come, at the latest tomorrow, thats the deadline. No doubt, we'll be fobbed off. I'll send the letter about it on Thursday (with a copy to the court) and we'll sit back and await our court date.

If you're reading this Pam, have you heard anything? If not, have you sent off your bundle?

Thanks again Gary for all your help, guidance and babysitting! you're a star and CAG will receive a donation (as long as the bank dont gobble it up in overdraft charges) thanks to all your sound advice.

 

We'll let you know what happens with this and other claims - we are waiting replies from around 10 creditors following SAR's.

Good luck everyone,

Mick and Jo:D:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys,

well, they've gone. Two court bundles sent first class, next day recorded delivery. Jeez..we needed a second mortgage just to pay for the postage! I'm surprised that the Royal Mail aren't sunning themselves in St Tropez the amount it costs to post parcels nowadays!!

 

But, they've gone!!

We'll ring [problem] tomorrow afternoon to enquire after theirs, which should come, at the latest tomorrow, thats the deadline. No doubt, we'll be fobbed off. I'll send the letter about it on Thursday (with a copy to the court) and we'll sit back and await our court date.

If you're reading this Pam, have you heard anything? If not, have you sent off your bundle?

Thanks again Gary for all your help, guidance and babysitting! you're a star and CAG will receive a donation (as long as the bank dont gobble it up in overdraft charges) thanks to all your sound advice.

 

We'll let you know what happens with this and other claims - we are waiting replies from around 10 creditors following S.A.R - (Subject Access Request)'s.

Good luck everyone,

Mick and Jo:D:D

Hi Jo & Mick

I sent off their bundle on Saturday and took one into the court this morning. (thought I may have seen you there)

What letter are you sending on Thursday? Can I have a peep at it?

 

I've got everything crossed and really hoping we don't have to go to court.

Like I said in earlier posts I am doing the claim for my son and his partner. They wouldn't have a clue what to say in court!!.

 

Good luck hope we won't be long now.

Cheers

pam

Link to post
Share on other sites

well i dont believe it.

 

 

:-o :-o :-o

 

 

no sooner do i get a letter from the courts threatening lloyds i also find out that lloyds settled immediately and the moneys been in my bank for the last 3 days!!!!!

 

they haven't even contacted me to let me know they've done it yet!!!!

 

:D :D :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Pam,

We got the letters from Gary H on the thread 'SC&M court bundle, non compliance' They are excellent and following tomorrows conversation with them, I will be sending letter number one.

 

Congratulations Shaney:D Was it the amount you were expecting? Great news if it was. We are hoping that LTSB dont credit our account otherwise we will remain totally skint, our overdraft monster will suck it all up. We have requested a cheque payment for our settlement in the court bundle, lets see eh!

See you on the 30th Pam, I'm sure your son will be fine.

Mick and Jo

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI Mick and Jo,

 

It's such a good feeling getting the bundle off! Mine is off too I think I'm a couple of days a head of you, my court date is on the 29th Jan, and my bundle had to be received on Monday. Just to let you know that surprise surprise the bundle didn't show from SCM and when I phoned them to ask what was going on they said that they hadn't prepared it and were waiting on Lloyds to advise on action to be taken.

 

Cool.

 

I'll chase again on friday and hope fully a nice fat cheque will be on its way??

 

Good luck to you.

 

Matt

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Matthew,

I have just called SC&M and spoke to a woman called Mrs White, who told me exactly the same as you were told.

I then 'respectfully' asked her "Do you not act on the orders of the court?"

She (snottilly) informed me that they act on orders from their client (LTSB) and no-one else and LTSB have not ordered them to release a court bundle for our case. I then said that we had sent ours as per the court order and surely we deserved the same courtesy from such a large and prestigious firm as themselves. The response was a 'snort' and "I'll look into it". (my a**e)

Well, it looks as if they don't work within the law and just please themselves (sorry moderator if this is a litigious comment, but whilst we are trying to keep a firm footing of the law of the land, they don't..and it just p**ses me off!!:mad:)

I asked 'Mrs White' to take our 'phone number and call us when she had investigated this matter, but I am not holding my breath waiting for the call.

I have drafted the letter that Gary put us onto to send to SC&M (thanks Gary :D) and Mick is going to fax it off from work this afternoon.

I will call them again tomorrow, no doubt to be put on hold for 15 minutes like today, but I may (not likely) get further info then.

Hi Pam, have you heard anything?:confused:

Jo and Mick

Link to post
Share on other sites

:eek::eek:OMG!!

Mrs White has just rung us and stated that LTSB are disputing the amount we are claiming and offering to pay us £2,988.47. This is almost £1,500 less than we are claiming for!

I told her that I would have to discuss this with Mick, but my gut feeling was to refuse this amount as it was so much less than originally claimed. Mrs White said that it would have to go to court then! I said OK and if we appeared in court, LTSB would have to justify their huge charges which would not only benefit us, but many other people as well, so we would welcome an appearance in court. I then asked again for the court bundle, saying that we need this to prepare for our court appearance and she told me that LTSB were only issuing orders for court appearances on 22nd january at the moment. I said that working on this date, we shouldnt expect our court bundle before our court date, which is going against the orders of the court yet again. Mrs White just repeated herself. (learned responses, so they dont get into bother;))

I then asked how the money would be paid to us, and she stated straight into our account, so this is a definite no go! If any money is paid into the account, the overdraft will eat it straight up and the damned overdraft is made up purely of their extortionate charges!! This is just getting me down now..and we have another few to get through....damn..damn..damn.

I'll keep you informed.

What now folks? Any advice will be highly welcomed..please advise us..please.

Jo and Mick.

Link to post
Share on other sites

QUOTE

Thanks Gary

I was speaking to a friend today who is also claiming against Lloyds.

He phoned SCM today re his court bundle. He was told that providing people had not claimed for charges that were not refundable, ie account charges and overdraft interest, they would be paid out before the court date.

Have you heard this before?

Pam

Hi Jo & Mick

Just wondering if this has anything to do with why they had offered you a lesser amount. I posted this on here last week. It may not be but I thought it was worth checking.

I rang SCM this morning.

Usual crap.

Haven't received my court bundle.

Person dealing with our case not available.

I said I was going to send a letter to the court.

They said "You do whatever you feel is necessary"

I felt like saying "AND UP YOURS TOO" but I didn't. I remained calm.

However, they do seem to speak to us as though we are the dregs of society.

 

Hope someone on here offers you some advice,

sorry I can't be of any more help.

Keep your chins up, nearly there now I'm sure.

Kind regards

Pam

Link to post
Share on other sites

:eek::eek:OMG!!

Mrs White has just rung us and stated that LTSB are disputing the amount we are claiming and offering to pay us £2,988.47. This is almost £1,500 less than we are claiming for!

I told her that I would have to discuss this with Mick, but my gut feeling was to refuse this amount as it was so much less than originally claimed. Mrs White said that it would have to go to court then! I said OK and if we appeared in court, LTSB would have to justify their huge charges which would not only benefit us, but many other people as well, so we would welcome an appearance in court. I then asked again for the court bundle, saying that we need this to prepare for our court appearance and she told me that LTSB were only issuing orders for court appearances on 22nd january at the moment. I said that working on this date, we shouldnt expect our court bundle before our court date, which is going against the orders of the court yet again. Mrs White just repeated herself. (learned responses, so they dont get into bother;))

I then asked how the money would be paid to us, and she stated straight into our account, so this is a definite no go! If any money is paid into the account, the overdraft will eat it straight up and the damned overdraft is made up purely of their extortionate charges!! This is just getting me down now..and we have another few to get through....damn..damn..damn.

I'll keep you informed.

What now folks? Any advice will be highly welcomed..please advise us..please.

Jo and Mick.

 

Hi Jo and Mick,

 

If they have offered you less than the full amount - and you are sure your claim amount is correct - then definitely refuse the offer. I'm sure they're hoping that offering you a high amount will tempt you into giving up. "Disputing the amount of your claim" is probably a fob off - unless there's a chance you've miscalculated.

 

As for crediting your bank, I don't think you have any choice on that. They don't seem to give on that, not that I've seen anyway. Is it not a good thing that the money will go to clearing your overdraft? If they have taken further charges since you began and your repayment will get eaten up by these then unfortunately there's not a lot you can do apart from beginning a new claim.

 

You'll get the full amount if you keep at it. Good luck. Lucid :)

Mindzai & Lucid vs Lloyds TSB

*Won unconditionally with contractual interest (29.85% compounded)

Lucid's Account - £749.62 * Joint Account - £2019.64 * Mindzai's Account - £595.65

*All settled in full - 6/2/07

*Hearings - 7/2/07

*Prelims sent - 9/8/06

_______

GOT A COURT DATE? A guide to the later stages

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly, have you claimed any monthly account service fee's (ie select account fee's), or the total of the monthly overdraft interest?

 

Standard account charges are not penalty charges so they cannot be reclaimed. Overdraft interest cannot be reclaimed either - except any proportion which was added on top of an unlawful charge. This is very complicated to work out though and does'nt usually total much anyway.

 

If you've claimed for either or both the above then I'm afraid you'll have to drop them from your claim. Take off the genuine service charges and O/D interest and see what that leaves you with. If its the same as their offer then you'd be strongly advised to take it.

 

If you haven't claimed for these and your sure the amount you originally claimed for is correct, then I would also agree with what Lucid has advised - hold out for the lot.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi jezzaa,

have a good look around. There are templates which advise you how to complete your forms. We printed them off and used them for guidance. Glad to see someone else on board, keep at it, even though we feel wrung out, we know it will all be worth it in the end.

Good luck finding your stuff.

Jo and Mick:smile::smile:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Gary and Lucid,

Thanks for getting back to us so quickly. We haven't claimed for account service fees but have claimed for various other charges, and have listed them below:

Unauthorised borrowing fee.

ATM handling charge.

Interest.OD useage fee.

OD excess fee.

As well as unpaid DD charge etc.

Have we cocked it up?

 

Please advise,

Jo and Mick:confused::confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can't claim the ATM charges or the OD interest.

 

Take them off and see what your left with.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, if we settle for this amount, is there a letter template for agreeing to the amount offered without conditions? We have two other claims against LTSB and we dont want to jeapordise these by agreeing that this figure is full and final settlement of all charges. Also, we dont want to be silenced. It is important that we help others on this site by our experiences and I have heard that some banks state that any dealings or settlement figures should not be disclosed. Is this right? Can they do this?

Jo

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, as well as the Unpaid DD, SO, or cheque fee's.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, if we settle for this amount, is there a letter template for agreeing to the amount offered without conditions? We have two other claims against LTSB and we dont want to jeapordise these by agreeing that this figure is full and final settlement of all charges. Also, we dont want to be silenced. It is important that we help others on this site by our experiences and I have heard that some banks state that any dealings or settlement figures should not be disclosed. Is this right? Can they do this?

Jo

They can't impose confidentiality without you agreeing to it, and you are certainly under no obligation to. Theres a good letter which was posted somewhere by Michael Browne which rejects conditions, I'll try to find it for you.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here you go:

 

Date

Dear Whoever

Ref: Your Offer of Settlement

 

Account: xxxxxxxx

Sort Code xx-xx-xx

Claim No: XXXXX in XXXX County Court

 

I acknowledge receipt of your letter date xx/xx/xx and your settlement offer of £XXX

 

I accept your offer as full and final settlement only for this claim of bank charges made on my account between xx/xx/xx and xx/xx/xx(dates of first and last charge)

 

I accept this offer without prejudice and I reserve the right to make any further claims should you apply future charges that may be considered unlawful under common law or in violation of the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 or Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977.

 

I will be willing to withdraw my claim upon receipt of unconditional full settlement of my claim.

 

I am also not prepared to agree to any confidentially clauses you try to impose, unless of course your client wishes to make an offer of due consideration in addition to the amount of £xxxxx, in order to be afforded this privilege by myself.

 

I trust that you will find this arrangement acceptable.

 

Yours Sincerely

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats the one! Cheers MB ;)

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...