Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
    • Developing computer games can be wildly expensive so some hope that AI can cut the cost.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Roadstar Autocentre - i've raised a Court Claim re: terrible service after wrongly fitting a turbo **WON**


gavino76

Recommended Posts

It's not necessary to see an invoice.

You will have to figure out how much you paid for the installation part of the work which was carried out – because that is what you want to claim back. If it's not clear what proportion of the bill was in respect of the installation, then you will probably need to get some outside opinions – independent opinions – as to the cost of an installation. It would be better to understate the value then overstate it – because if the cost is not clear then that could become the subject of a dispute if you take this to court.

You will be better off identifying an amount of money which you could reasonably attribute to the cost of installing the new turbo – and which will be supported by independent evidence – and which will be accepted without much question from the judge.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok. On the invoice I'm quite sure they've stated 5 hours labour for installation. So I'll go with that amount. 

 

I'll tweak this template I have later and show you asap. Thank you for your time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

"Quite sure" suggests that you're not completely sure and that you are guessing to the best of your recollection.

Don't.

Be sure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

21 Upper bridge road, chelmsford, CM2 0AY

Roadstar LTD, new writtle street, chelmsford, CM2 0LF

Dear Jon sharply 

Reference: Faulty turbo installation

As it has not been possible to resolve this matter amicably, and it is apparent that court action may be necessary, I write in compliance with the Practice Direction on Pre-Action Conduct.

 

At the end of 2019 I asked you to check my vehicle for problems. After leaving my vehicle with you at your request, you could not find any problems and told me to take it to ford. Ford provided a list of problems, one of which was that the turbo had stopped working. I asked you to replace it. Immediately Upon receiving my vehicle back, a high pitched screaming emitted from the engine area. You sent the mechanic who fitted the turbo out on a drive with me and he told me to my face he could not hear the high pitched screaming coming from my engine. I emailed you to ask what was going to happen and you completely ignored me. I called you and you told me it was nothing to do with you and not your problem.

 

From you I am claiming: £480 for 5 hours turbo installation

 

I have calculated this sum: From the amount stated on your invoice.

 

Listed below are the documents on which I intend to rely in my claim against you:

Invoice from an independent garage who repaired the faulty work you’ve done

 

In accordance with the Practice Direction on Pre-Action Conduct I would request that you provide me with copies of the following documents:

[List any documents you want from the party you are claiming from]

 

I can confirm that I would be agreeable to mediation and would consider any other system of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) in order to avoid the need for this matter to be resolved by the courts. (NOT SURE ABOUT THIS?)

 

I would invite you to put forward any proposals in this regard. 

 

[Alternatively you can set out details of any ADR scheme that you would be prepared to use]

 

In closing, I would draw your attention to paragraphs 15 and 16 of the Practice Direction which gives the courts the power to impose sanctions on the parties if they fail to comply with the direction including failing to respond to this letter before claim. 

I look forward to hearing from you within the next 28 days. 

 

Should I not receive a response to my letter within this time frame, then I anticipate that court action will be commenced with no further reference to you.

Yours faithfully,

 

 

 

hello. ive had to copy and paste this as i can seem to use word - it didn't look like this before i pasted it. Am i on the right track?

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, gavino76 said:

hello. ive had to copy and paste this as i can seem to use word - it didn't look like this before i pasted it. Am i on the right track?

 

sorted for you

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The letter has far too much in it – some of it is not relevant – and apart from anything else, if he didn't comply with the various things that you are saying, you wouldn't know what to do about it.

The best thing to do is to keep it simple.

 

Quote

Dear XXX

On XX date I left my vehicle registration XXX to investigate for certain problems. You reported that you were unable to find anything wrong. You recommended that I take it to a Ford dealership.

The Ford dealership reported that amongst other things the turbo had ceased to function – which you had not discovered.

I returned the vehicle to you and asked you to replace the turbo. You did so and charged me for the turbo £XXX and also £XXX Labour for installation.

Within a short time the turbo unit started to make serious noises but when I telephoned you about it you told me that it was not your problem and that you wouldn't do anything about it.

I have since had to take the car to a another repairer who discovered that the turbocharger had been incorrectly installed. They were obliged to remove it and reinstall it correctly and it is now working satisfactorily.

This means that I have unnecessary paid you £XXX for the installation of the turbo.

I require the refund of this money.

I have tried to engage with you on this but you have declined to become involved.

If I do not receive a full refund within 14 days that I will sue you in the County Court and without any further notice.

Yours sincerely
 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope you won't mind me saying that when you draft letters or documents, you should be using words and phrases that you understand and that you understand the impact of – and in that way you will be confident and in control. If you simply cut-and-paste stuff from other sources that you don't really know what they mean, then it will look as if you are making up as you go along – and you will never have confidence in what you do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you don't understand what you're saying then don't say it.

 

Yes recorded post is a good idea

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear jon

In December 2019 I left you my vehicle to investigate for certain problems. You reported that you were unable to find anything wrong. You recommended that I take it to a Ford dealership.

The Ford dealership reported that amongst other things the turbo had ceased to function – which you had not discovered.

I returned the vehicle to you and ask you to replace the turbo. You did so and charged me £742.50 for the turbo and also £480 Labour for installation.

Immediately after i drove it away from you the turbo unit started to make serious noises but when I telephoned you about it you told me that it was not your problem and that you wouldn't do anything about it.

I have since had to take the car to a another garage who discovered that the turbo had been incorrectly installed, They were obliged to remove it and reinstall it correctly and it is now working satisfactorily.

This means that I have unnecessary paid you £480 for the installation of the turbo.

I require the refund of this money.

I have tried to engage with you on this but you have declined to become involved.

If I do not receive a full refund within 14 days that I will sue you in the County Court and without any further notice.

Yours sincerely
 

gavin 
Link to post
Share on other sites

Head office might be best

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

hello there.

 

So i have a receipt for proof of posting for the letter we have spoken about. Date of posting is 17th Nov.

 

I have had one missed call from the garage and that's it. can you let me know what i have to do next please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, I'm not sure where you are on this. It's been so long since you engaged with this thread that I rather lost track.

Can you explain exactly what you've done so far.

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh im sorry about that. i didn't want to constantly bombard you. Ive done as you said, and sent a letter to the garage by recorded post. the letter was written exactly as above.

 

ive had a missed call and that's about it

Link to post
Share on other sites

A number of things:

First of all, are you referring to the draft letter of claim which you posted up here on 30 October – a month ago? If so, then when did you send it?

Secondly, if you have sent a letter of claim giving 14 days and the deadline which you set out in the letter has expired, then why haven't you moved onto the next step? Haven't you read around this forum about the steps required to begin an action in the County Court so that you are ready to go the moment that your deadline expires? Do you understand the steps that you need to take? Have you registered on moneyclaim online?

We give advice here but it is a self-help forum and part of the deal is that we help you for free but in return you have to read around to understand where you are and what your next steps are. This means that you join in the effort with us and also you will gain confidence by understanding what to do rather than having to ask us for answers all the time.

So please let us know what date you sent the letter – and if you have registered with the County Court website – moneyclaim.

Finally, you sent us a very generous donation. Thank you very much indeed. It's appreciated very much – but I have refunded the money to you. I think that you sent it to us by way of an apology for bothering us but you're not bothering us and that's not what donations are for anyway.

What would be really helpful is if you would make sure that you understand all the steps and that you engage with the thread properly.

If you get a result – and I expect you will if you are tenacious and persistent about this, then you can certainly give us a donation if you want – and we will be pleased to accept.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello.

 

yes, im referring to the draft letter of claim that i posted up a month ago. I done as you asked, sent it recorded delivery on the 17th november and left it at that as i had nothing  more to say? 

 

i haven't moved onto the next step as i did not know what it was, I've never made a claim before, done plenty of reading about it - as i have just done when logging into my government gateway account. I read the whole of the guidance info and its quite daunting. it may seem clear as day to you, and others as i have come across their posts, they seem to navigate quite easily though it.

 

Maybe I'm just unsure of myself. its quite clear that if you make a wrong entry it can be disastrous and time consuming.

 

Ive registered with MCOL. and begun a claim. is it against the garage, is it against the manager, you know, im just afraid to put a foot wrong,

 

I made the donation to show that im serious about this and i do genuinely appreciate your help as id otherwise have nowhere else to turn.

 

shall i make a draft POC  and let you see?

 

 

thanks 

  •  

 

In December 2019 I left you my vehicle to 
investigate for certain problems.

Eventually you installed a new turbo with 
labour costing £480.

An independent garage has had to reinstall 
the turbo correctly as you would not engage 
with me when i complained to you about 
problems with it.

I have the faulty items in my possession as 
proof.

i now require the refund of this money 
including interest.

 

( My draft POC)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, well it has the merit of being brief – and that's good. Most people want to write their life history.

I suggest:

Quote

On XXX date the defendant agreed to investigate and to repair a problem with the claimant's vehicle make XX registration XXX. The defendant discovered that the vehicle's turbocharger had failed and had to be replaced. The defendant replace the turbocharger at a cost of £XX for the replacement unit and £XXX labour charge. The repair failed and an independent garage discovered that the turbocharger had been incorrectly fitted. The defendant declined to rectify the problem and so the claimant paid the independent garage to refit the turbo unit which is now working satisfactory.
The claimant seeks reimbursement of £XXX wasted labour charge for the fitting of the turbo unit plus £XXX ancillary losses incurred plus interest pursuant to section 69 of the County Courts act 1984

 

 

Please have a look at this. I haven't looked back at your whole story so I'm not sure if this sums it up. Please let us know if there is anything missing or anything wrong and we will amend it. Also, I can't remember if you suffered additional losses for since by having to pay me for the car to be transported or anything. So I have included that in the POC but of course it can be removed.

If you did incur ancillary losses then please let us know what they were

Link to post
Share on other sites

When i said they declined to rectify the problem, they had me collect the mechanic in question and drive him about to hear the high pitched screaming coming from the engine, which was more than clearly apparent as it was high pitched screaming, but he told me he couldnt hear anything.

 

so i guess we can just skip that right

 

 

 

there were no costs if I'm honest. just absolute inconvenience borrowing other vehicles trying to get into work 

 

In december 2019, the defendant agreed to 
investigate into repair a problem with the 
claimant's vehicle ford transit registration 
........ The defendant discovered that the 
vehicle's turbocharger had failed and had to 
be replaced. The defendant replaced the 
turbocharger at a cost of £742.50 for the 
replacement unit and £480 labour charge. 

The repair failed and an independent garage 
discovered that the turbocharger had been 
incorrectly fitted. The defendant declined to 
rectify the problem so the claimant paid an 
independent garage to refit the turbo unit 
which is now working satisfactorily. The 
claimant seeks reimbursement of £480 wasted 
labour charge for the fitting of the turbo 
unit, plus interest pursuant to section 69 county courts act 1984

Link to post
Share on other sites

That looks ok so if you are happy then send it off.

please will you start doing some proper reading about the steps which are going to happen. Follow the links >>>>> small claim county court

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i already have read the guidance, but i think ill need to read a it a few times! thanks again old chap.

ill report back asap

 

I've fulfilled the pre action requirements by sending the 14 day warning letter, and i have a receipt of posting. so i can continue?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ive received a notice of issue from the court. The claim was issued on the 2nd december.

the court sent it 1st class post to the defendant  and it will be deemed to be served on the 7th december.

the defendant has until the 21st december to reply.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...