Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. I am reading through the full thread and will continue to research. I have come across a reference to a form called N180 DQ in the thread, but I cannot see any reference to this form in my case nor can I see it on the MoneyClaim website. Should I have been sent this form? Thanks 
    • 12mph (beyond any UK limit) will certainly qualify for a Fixed Penalty. So you should received an offer of a FP for each of the remaining two offences. Be sure to submit your licence details as instructed when you accept the offer. If you don't your £100 will be returned to you and the police will prosecute you in court.
    • and it will be also now written off under age related criteria anyway.
    • @dx100ukThanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe consequences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points? @Man in the middleI've been searching the forum and you seem very knowledgeable. Would you mind giving a look at my query please? Thanks in advance!!
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

CEL ANPR PCN Wigmore Valley Park Community Centre Eaton Green Rd Luton LU2 9JB. No NTK Received HELP!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1421 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

Just received a final demand for payment of a PCN from CE-Service, this is my first knowledge of a supposed charge.

I obviously want to challenge them all the way as at the time of the supposed charge we were all in lock down due to covid 19 (25/05/20).

 

My question is how do I get them to resend the PCN so at least I can appeal against it ??

 

The final demand only has my vehicle details and date of supposed charge no information regarding location, time or photo etc.

Any help would be greatly appreciated

Truckert

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • FTMDave changed the title to CEL - No Notice To Keeper Received HELP!!!!

Could you post a  scan or picture pdf of the letter please, then we can see sort of best way to approach it.if you click on pdf it should link to a guide on how to do it.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

urm..

why have you received nothing else?

is the vehicle used not registered to your current address?

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't even think about appealing - CEL are one of the most dishonest, cowboy PPCs and will never accept any appeal ever.  Even worse, by appealing you could identify the driver and throw away your protection under the 2012 POFA law (at the moment CEL know who the keeper of the vehicle is, but not the driver).

 

We normally ask people to fill in the forum sticky but I appreciate you haven't got much information yet.

 

 

I suppose you could ring them (or write, don't e-mail), be all apologetic and say the PCN must have gone astray due to the emergency and could they please resend.  As they're interested in £££££ they're likely to cooperate.  Then we can pick holes in their demand.

 

There are no guarantees, but the experts here have an excellent record of seeing off CEL.  When you have time, look at CEL cases in the PPC Successes thread at the top of the page.  You'll get an idea of their MO and how to see them off.

Edited by FTMDave
Typo

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, dx is spot on.  Have you moved recently and not informed the DVLA?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All

Thanks for the reply's no I haven't moved recently been living here 15 years.

Car has been registered to me at this address for 3 years.

And yes it's the only letter I have received.

I shall scan the letter I  the morning and upload it for you all

Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm Saying that we were in lock down and from my recollection the only place I went was the park with my wife for some exercise so a little confused to be honest. 

 

here is a copy of the letter I received as requested with details removed obviously. 

 

 

PCN.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

urm..smells of clone number plate or mis-read by a crap anpr system..

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no information on the back of the letter just what you see there

 

just need away to get any further information so as to appeal without making things worse.

 

FTMDave's  idea might be a good way forward.

 

Thoughts everyone ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I drove to the park on that day, I shall have a drive up the park tomorrow and have a look in the car park for any signs and update you all once I know.

 

Was up there a couple of hours its free parking. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

aha that will explain it.

you do NOT appeal ever!
 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

what car park?

 

its typical that when PPC's are involved in managing parking, they always think they can change the time limits the council set when initially granting planning permission for the area. they can't!

 

as you been in the area years I bet they've taken over parking where you parked since last visit and you didn't realise.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will go up there in the morning and take pictures of any signage, to be honest it was the first time we had been out in 6 weeks so wasn't taking much notice was just glad to have a change of scenery.

 

Just need a way forward  once I get the signage pics if there is any, first time I have been up there by car as we usually walk but because of the lockdown I thought it would be safer to drive.

 

As stated never received any Notice To Keeper so bill has increased to £100 now (Final Demand)

They make me sick blood suckers.

 

 

Edited by truckert
Link to post
Share on other sites

just read our UPLOAD guide and use one multipage pdf only

 

I will suspect CEL discovered they were already out of time to send a notice to keeper so didn't bother ( of there are ANPR cameras at the car park - they only had 14 days to send it), so now they are sunk and thought they could send you a kite to see if you wet yourself.

 

dx

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there anything I can do i.e  send them a template letter regarding the out of time or do I ignore ??

Will have a look for cameras when i'm up there tomorrow.

 

Could I send an email to the DVLA regarding when they request the information for the vehicle would that help ??

 

Would something like this be of use ???

 

Sirs

Ref PCN xxxxx VRM yyyyyy

I am the registered keeper of the above vehicle and am in receipt of the PCN you issued.

I have no liability on this matter as you have failed to meet the requirements of Schedule 4 of The Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 namely, failing to deliver the Notice to Keeper to me within the relevant period as required by 8 (4) of the Act.

In addition, the Notice to Keeper that you purport to have delivered failed, amongst other things, to give the invitation to pay that is required, contrary to section 8 (2) (e) of the Act. You cannot therefore transfer liability from the driver at the time to me.

There is no legal requirement to identify the driver at the time and I will not be doing so.

Any further communication with me on this matter, apart from confirmation of no further action and my details being removed from your records, will be considered vexatious and harassment. This includes communication from any Debt Collection companies you care to instruct.

Yours etc.

Edited by truckert
Link to post
Share on other sites

woe slowdown!

 

there is absolutely nothing you need to do bar go pay the site a visit at present.

 

sending anything to anyone at this stage might well cause more bad than good.

 

there is absolutely NOTHING they can do to you at this stage.

and there is absolutely nothing you NEED do to 'improve' your perceived increase in liability or cost if you don't.

 

the very worst is a CCJ claim

 

and they would have to send a 30 day warning letter of claim before they can ever instigate a court claim.

 

you are in the info gathering time stage, use it wisely!!

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

:rockon:

CEL always screw up themselves oneway or another on every speculative invoice they issue.

 

sadly as with nearly every PPC speculative invoice issued, the receiver jumps in with two feet first and usually shoots themselves in the foot by following stupid advice found on other sites bar cag or by their own stupid ignorance...OH I'VE BEEN FINED lets panic...it's not a fine and you don't.

 

you don't need to help them...simply gather info to prove their screwup.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just get pictures of signs at the entrance and dotted apout the car park, the entry sign is important in what it doesn't say on it.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...