Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Sars request sent on 16th March and also sent a complaint separately to Studio. Have received no response. Both letters were received and signed for.  I was also told by the financial ombudsman that studio were investigating but I've also had no response to that either.  The only thing Studio have sent me is a default notice.  Any ideas of what I can do from here please 
    • Thanks Bank - I shall tweak my draft and repost. And here's today's ridiculous email from the P2G 'Claims Dept' Good Morning,  Thank you for you email. Unfortunately we would be unable to pay the amount advised in your previous email.  When you placed the order, you were asked for the value of your parcel, you stated that the value was £265.00. At this stage the booking advised that you were covered to £20.00 and to enhance this to £260.00 you could pay an extra £13.99 + VAT to fully cover your item for loss or damage during transit, you declined to fully cover your item.  Towards the end of your booking on the confirmation page, you were then offered to take cover again, to which you declined again.  Unfortunately, we would be unable to offer you an enhanced payment on this occasion.  If I can assist further, please do let me know.  Kindest Regards Claims Team and my response Good Afternoon  Do you not understand the court cases of PENCHEV v P2G (225MC852) and SMIRNOVS v P2G (27MC729)? In both cases it was held by the courts that there was no need for additional ‘cover’ or ‘protection’ (or whatever you wish to call it) on top of the standard delivery charge, and P2G were required to pay up in full for both cases, which by then also included court costs and interest. I shall be including copies of both those judgements in the bundle I submit to the court next Wednesday 1 May, unless you settle my claim (£274.10) in full before then. Tick tock…..    
    • IMG_2820-IMG_2820-merged.pdfmerged.pdf Case management was this morning. Here is the Sheriff’s order. Moved case forward to 24/05.   He said there was no signed agreement and after a bit of “erm, erm, yeah but, erm” when he asked them, he allowed time for sol to contact claimant.  what is the next step now? thank you UCM  
    • I've had a quick (well, quick for a thread of this length),  read of this thread and to be honest I'm struggling to make heads nor tails of the actual crux of the issue here. You seem awfully convinced that whatever is going on is worth the fight and the odds are in your favour but with how the thread has gone it seems that one trail goes cold so you simply move on to another in an attempt to delay the inevitable. All it does is end up digging holes and confusing others and yourself which means any advice given to you is completely pointless. I note that for the life of this thread there has not been any documentation or correspondence uploaded for people to have a look. Have you got any that you'd be willing to redact and upload for members to assist you? Right now, it seems people are shooting out advice while being in the dark because it's starting to become very difficult for people who weren't here at the start of this (including myself) to follow along. Right now, this whole thread is just hypothetical "He said, she said" and is going nowhere fast. Nothing more than basic advice can be given which, as you've sought out some legal advice, is likely not sufficient to actually come to any sort of conclusion. I, personally, am starting to agree with others that it may be best to consider bankruptcy and put the matter behind you.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Nursery refuse to return childcare vouchers


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1763 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This is long and I don't want to drop feed so please bear with me. 

 

Our child has gone to a nursery since the age of 18 months. We always paid for 2 set days (whether she attended or not) and paid for additional days when required on an as hoc basis. We pay with childcare vouchers and set up a payment of £243 per month (maximum we can take) and topped this up when given an invoice. We never had a contract and often invoices were a scrap of paper or handwritten note.

 

When child turned 3 she was entitled to up to 30 hours funded per week for 38 weeks. You can spread this over the year which is 21.9 hours per week. I spoke with owner who said it was fine to continue as previously. The 2 days would be funded (20 hours per week to a total of less than full yearly entitlement) and pay for additional days as required. 

 

The owner was then off sick and the Manager very busy. We didn't have a contract again but did fill in a funding form which stated we were claiming hours for 2 days only at a total of 20 per week. We also filled these in for the 2 following terms. 

 

Naively on our part we continued to pay £243 as we did not want to get in debt and had requested something in writing saying what we were to pay. We did not receive this so continued to pay with a view to ensuring additional sessions were covered and them refunding anything we had paid that was not owed. 

 

When the Owner returned (approx 5 months ago so 5 months after funded hours started) I spoke with her again. She said she would invoice me as I would owe money. I reminded her that child was 2days per week funded and additional days as required and she probably owed me. She did not argue this and said she would look at it. 

 

In April we had no vouchers left (we put it down to the minimum of £5 per week coming out of the wage due to now having funding). We contacted nursery and the Owner said it should have "more or less been right what you were paying". We said this could not be the case as she has 2 days free and we only pay for others as necessary and not often. She said she would look. 

 

After further emails and discussions requesting information and invoices we got a greetings card with a lot of sums in saying we owe £192 per month and then additional sessions on top. No explanation of why. 

 

We emailed and asked why. We got no answer. We then spoke with the Manager who said that it must be a mistake as child is taking fewer hours than entitled and she would look in to it. 

 

5 days later we got an official letter stating that they do not allow funding over 2 days and had claimed 21.9 hours per week and therefore we had to top up the 1.9 hours to a third full day at the cost of £43 per day and therefore they were keeping just shy of £1500 in vouchers. It was written as if by the Owner and said that when we agreed £243 a month that was a mistake but it should be £43 per week. 

 

I emailed giving information that I had never been told this and had only ever claimed for 20 hours and was under the impression we had the same agreement we always had. It is now 10 months later that they want to tell me about this. 

 

The Manager emailed back and it was clear she wrote the letter, not the owner, as she said she assumed I had agreed £243 with the owner rather than continuing payments but that this is the policy so there is little they can do. I have not been given any such policy. Also if it was the policy why did she not know that 5 days before giving me the letter. 

 

I emailed again with lots of information I believe shows we did not know this. I said I never authorised them to claim more than 20 hours per week funding and that I should not have to pay if we have no contract. I asked them to resolve it by 28th June by coming to an agreement with me and if not send me all documents pertaining to child and their complaints policy. 

 

I received a further email saying it was clear it was a misunderstanding but as there is no written agreement it is difficult to resolve. They asked for ideas on how to move forward. They admitted they claimed for hours they shouldn't but said they informed the LA of their mistake. 

 

I replied that day (25th) giving 3 options and linking to a document from LA pointing out that it says I do not have to take full hours and they cannot force me to pay for hours on top of funded hours. All options involved them refunding my money, 1 by sticking to agreement we had prior to funding, 2 by continuing to claim full hours but spread over 38 weeks and us paying only for holiday sessions taken not in term time, 3 adding up total hours claimed and total taken and us paying for any over this at an hourly rate.

 

This email was not responded to. I have now emailed saying that as I have had no response I want the following to decide how to proceed:

All signed documents regarding child

Copies of the forms we completed to claim funding

Copies of any funding claims.they made with LA

Copy of complaints procedure. 

 

I'd like advice from anyone here on how to proceed. I know that businesses selling goods have to offer mediation as of 2015 but I don't know of nursery provision would be included in this. 

 

I know I was stupid to keep paying in good faith because the Owner was ill and should have stopped paying. However, if they didn't have my vouchers they would have no way of claiming this money from me so I don't see why they should get to keep it.

 

Do I take this to small claims if they won't pay? My child has graduation from nursery on 10th and this is making everything very awkward. Our child is meant to be with them until September and I can't make plans for summer holiday care for either of them until I know what I am paying for with the nursery as I need the vouchers to do this.

 

Thanks in advance if you read all that 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...