Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx, What you have written is certainly helpful to my understanding. The only thing I would say, what I found to be most worrying and led me to start this discussion is, I believe the judge did not merely admonish the defendant in the case in question, but used that point to dismiss the case in the claimants favour. To me, and I don't have your experience or knowledge, that is somewhat troubling. Again, the caveat being that we don't know exactly what went on but I think we can infer the reason for the judgement. Thank-you for your feedback. EDIT: I guess that the case I refer to is only one case and it may never happen again and the strategy not to appeal is still the best strategy even in this event, but I really did find the outcome of that case, not only extremely annoying but also worrying. Let's hope other judges are not quite so narrow minded and don't get fixated on one particular issue as FTMDave alluded to.
    • Indians, traditionally known as avid savers, are now stashing away less money and borrowing more.View the full article
    • the claimant in their WS can refer to whatever previous CC judgements they like, as we do in our WS's, but CC judgements do not set a legal precedence. however, they do often refer to judgements like Bevis, those cases do created a precedence as they were court of appeal rulings. as for if the defendant, prior to the raising of a claim, dobbed themselves in as the driver in writing during any appeal to the PPC, i don't think we've seen one case whereby the claimant referred to such in their WS.. ?? but they certainly typically include said appeal letters in their exhibits. i certainly dont think it's a good idea to 'remind' them of such at the defence stage, even if the defendant did admit such in a written appeal. i would further go as far to say, that could be even more damaging to the whole case than a judge admonishing a defendant for not appealing to the PPC in the 1st place. it sort of blows the defendant out the water before the judge reads anything else. dx  
    • Hi LFI, Your knowledge in this area is greater than I could possibly hope to have and as such I appreciate your feedback. I'm not sure that I agree the reason why a barrister would say that, only to get new customers, I'm sure he must have had professional experience in this area that qualifies him to make that point. 🙂 In your point 1 you mention: 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver. I understand the point you are making but I was referring to when the keeper is also the driver and admits it later and only in this circumstance, but I understand what you are saying. I take on board the issues you raise in point 2. Is it possible that a PPC (claimant) could refer back to the case above as proof that the motorist should have appealed, like they refer back to other cases? Thanks once again for the feedback.
    • Well barristers would say that in the hope that motorists would go to them for advice -obviously paid advice.  The problem with appealing is at least twofold. 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver.  And in a lot of cases the last thing the keeper wants when they are also the driver is that the parking company knows that. It makes it so much easier for them as the majority  of Judges do not accept that the keeper and the driver are the same person for obvious reasons. Often they are not the same person especially when it is a family car where the husband, wife and children are all insured to drive the same car. On top of that  just about every person who has a valid insurance policy is able to drive another person's vehicle. So there are many possibilities and it should be up to the parking company to prove it to some extent.  Most parking company's do not accept appeals under virtually any circumstances. But insist that you carry on and appeal to their so called impartial jury who are often anything but impartial. By turning down that second appeal, many motorists pay up because they don't know enough about PoFA to argue with those decisions which brings us to the second problem. 2] the major parking companies are mostly unscrupulous, lying cheating scrotes. So when you appeal and your reasons look as if they would have merit in Court, they then go about  concocting a Witness Statement to debunk that challenge. We feel that by leaving what we think are the strongest arguments to our Member's Witness Statements, it leaves insufficient time to be thwarted with their lies etc. And when the motorists defence is good enough to win, it should win regardless of when it is first produced.   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

What are my rights? - I had a car accident yesterday


Theangel1971
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1762 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Dear All,

 

I had a car accident yesterday,

the road surface has been gravelled that day & the stones were still loose.

I was driving 20 mile an hour because I didn’t want the stone to chip my paint work.

 

Other cars we’re over taking me & one overtook me on a bend,  

before I knew what was happening my car skidded on the stones & I was veering onto the other side of the road.

 

I pulled the steering wheel to the left to get the car back on the left hand side.

It skidded even more, steering wheel locked & before I knew it the became out of control driving off the road, knocking down a Ballard & into a hedge.

 

I found the insurance company very unhelpful,   

The recovery truck picked up my vehicle & told me I had to get myself home

 

Today I have been told by the insurance that my car is a write off, which means I loose the 5 months left on it’s insurance that I’ve paid in full, I can’t have a hire car because although I paid nearly £500 for my insurance which included a courtesy car in the event of an accident,  I don’t get a courtesy car.

 

I pay £250 excess on top of all this.

 

Is all this allowed, do my insurance company really get to do this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly, please will you space your posts out a bit better so that they are easier to read. Thanks.

Secondly, if a courtesy car is included in the insurance then why aren't they providing it to you? You don't explain and we really have no basis for making a guess.

Thirdly, are you sure that the vehicle is a write-off? What is the value of the vehicle – for you to replace – equivalent mileage, condition – everything? How much do they say would be the cost of repairs?

You had the accident yesterday and already they've assessed the vehicle as being written off. This seems extraordinarily quick to me.

Which insurer are we talking about here?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

They say I am only entitled to a courtesy car when the car is being repaired not when it has been written off.

 

They have not given me details of the cost for the repair.  The value of the car is approximately £4000. 

 

The insurers are called  Admiral.

 

Also, my insurance states they provide up to £100 to cover injury. I have really hurt my back but there has been no mention of it at all. Just what they want from me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay. The first thing you have to realise is that the insurer is in conflict with you in suffer as your interests are concerned. They want to save money and rip you off. You want to get properly compensated for all of your losses.

He say the value of the car is approximately £4000. Is this the value that you have given it? Is this the value the insurer has given it? You need to be doing some proper research to find out the cost of a replacement vehicle. The purchase price to you – not a trade price. You can be certain that Admiral will attempt to fob you off with some kind of trade price.

How have they informed you that it is a write off? You must take control of this and the first thing you should do is that you should write to them and asked them for the basis of their write off assessment and copies of any evaluations of the damage and assessments of repair costs. At the very least you must make them realise that you won't simply be accepting what they say.

Secondly, if you say that you have been injured then have you been to the doctor? If not, then why not? You should have gone to the doctor immediately and get a proper examination with a view eventually to getting a report. If you haven't been to a doctor then do it now.

I don't understand that the insurer is only providing you £100 to cover injury. This seems to be a very unlikely situation. Is it not possible that you have misinterpreted the situation and that the hundred pounds is intended to cover immediate expenses of some sort?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I spoke with my doctor on the phone because I was in too much pain to walk to the surgery. He has prescribed me some painkillers. Tomorrow I will go & see him then. 

 

I valued the car car based on its market value today.

 

They  informed me on the telephone it has been written off. I have called the garage the insurer sent to retrieve the car at the time of the accident & told them I still need to check the car for valuables. This has delayed them, in the meantime I will write to admiral requesting the information you have advised.

 

thank you 

146610903.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay I understand now that because there is no third party involved, you will be able to claim anything for your injuries – just up to £100 medical expenses. Unless you are thinking of suing the council or whoever it was was responsible for the gravel on the road, there won't be any point in doctors reports et cetera.

I hope that you are in contact with the insurer by email because everything needs to be done quickly. They will be taking steps to dispose of the vehicle and you should make sure that they agree what the value is before this happens. When you go to visit the car tomorrow take photographs – inside and outside.

I think you should phone the insurer now and tell them that you want the information relating to their write off assessment – and then confirm this in writing. You should read our customer services guide and implement the advice there. You should also email the garage and instruct them that they are not to do anything with the vehicle without hearing that there has been an agreement from you – the owner. The insurer will try to say that they are owning the vehicle – but you want to ascertain that they agree with your evaluation. I can imagine that you will get a shock when they see how much space there is between your evaluation and their evaluation – although I'm thinking extremely pessimistically here but better to be prudent and cautious.

I flagged this up to our site team member  @unclebulgaria67and I expect that he will be along at some point and will no doubt give you much better advice than I can and if it is in conflict with my advice at all then follow his.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

This is the email I received back from  the insurance company:

Quote

 

 I have spoken to our salvage agents and told them to delay the collection of your vehicle. If by any chance you happy for them to collect the car because you don’t want to retain your vehicle and there are personal belongings still in the car, please let us know and we can request for them to be posted back to you.

 


Now your vehicle has been deemed a total loss if you want to retain your car, you’re able to do so but the vehicle would need a category against it. As long as it is a category N or S you can put the vehicle back on the road. We would need a new MOT on the car though to make sure it was safe and legal to drive. We may cancel the insurance on that vehicle until a new MOT has been completed.

 


If you are happy for us to dispose of your car then you have the alternative option of reactivating the insurance on another vehicle. There may be some additional premium for the change of the vehicle, and this is usually determined by risk. The best example I can give is if you were to place a more expensive vehicle on your car this would be determined as a change in risk.


I know you asked for some costs to determine how we total loss vehicles. The best explanation I can give after speaking to a handler who works in the first notification of loss department would be, they take the market value that is placed on the car by you as the policy holder which in this case would be £3605. They then determine based on the glasses guide which we use to place market values on vehicles if the market value is within a certain percentage the car is then a total loss.

 

The damage doesn’t always have to be severe it can be because it is uneconomical to repair, as your insurer we promise to replace all parts on a car with genuine main dealer replacements and these tend to cost more than the parts you may get from a local garage.
If you need more information about the market value of your vehicle, please follow the online link my colleague sent in a previous email to access our online portal. It is an application that can be accessed whenever you’re free to

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You now need to decide whether to accept their valuation or to challenge it. You could challenge it completely or you can simply try to negotiate a better settlement. Effectively they are offering you £3600.

You should understand that although they are offering to have the vehicle retained, at some point they will say to you that you become responsible for the costs of the retention.

Have you had any work done recently on the vehicle? For instance has it got new tyres or new brakes. Have you recently laid out a reasonable sum of money for maintenance or improvement?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

only the usual services etc. 3600 is about what I would get for it if I had sold it.

 

I will of course loose what is effectively £200 for the rest of the years insurance & I will have to pay the £250 excess.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well do a bit of research, find some examples of the same vehicle for about £4200. Send those to the insurer and say to them that you dispute their valuation. You think that the true value is £4200 but in the interests of getting out the way and is matter of goodwill, you would be prepared to accept £4000.

Maybe they will come back with £3800 and you can accept that. At least then the problem is gone.

Try that

 

In fact you would even tell them that unless they give you the proper value of the vehicle that you want them to consider your letter as a formal complaint and they should pass it to the ombudsman.

This might motivate them to meet you halfway rather more quickly

Link to post
Share on other sites

Admiral probably won't offer near £3600. They are most likely to offer lower end of value shown in Glasses guide. Then you will have the excess deducted from the amount.

 

Always up to policyholder to negotiate the market value by providing evidence of similar cars for sale locally. Details of condition of the car pre accident etc. 

 

Depending on the damage you can always get a local garage or AA/RAC to carry out an inspection and report on damage/costs of repair. But they may charge you and the Insurers won't cover costs of your inspection report.

 

Insurers don't mess around with repairs over a certain value, as can be a pain, as they would be liable for more repairs if policyholder unhappy after initial repair or damage was missed.

 

The £100 injury cover i thought was not cover for actual injury. I thought this was cover if you incurred costs due to be injured e.g. ambulance call charge. 

 

Cannot really criticise Admiral as what you have been told by them appears to be correct. Unfortunately most people don't realise how Insurance works until they need to claim.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 26/06/2019 at 12:49, Theangel1971 said:

Hi,

 

only the usual services etc. 3600 is about what I would get for it if I had sold it.

 

I will of course loose what is effectively £200 for the rest of the years insurance & I will have to pay the £250 excess.

 

Sounds like you've got a good deal there, it's hard for insurance companies to get it wrong (or get away with it) these days. 

 

Often if you place another car on cover within a certain time frame they will transfer the cover over for the rest of the term, subject to additional costs if say you get a different make model etc.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Market value of the car has yet to be negotiated.  Never accept first offer, as the Insurers will often increase with further evidence of current sales prices.  But Insurers won't match list prices shown at car dealers and they expect most people to negotiate a small discount;.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...