Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Intrum SD for old HBOS credit card debt ***Withdrawn***


George43
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1856 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have received statutory demand from Debt collector  late April.  

It was served through the letter box. 

It is the fourth debt collector since 2016 for the same debt from the same bank.


The account with the bank was opened about 10 years ago and was in default since 2016.
I have not been in contact with Debt Collector since they purchased the debt in November last year.


The first paragraph in the box of debt description in the statutory demand  is:
"The debtor entered into contract with bank ...

And was given the account number ...

The debtor failed to adhere to the contract terms and conditions."


The only prove of my debt the collector has (it seems) is the letter of assignment from the bank.


I am going to request CCA from them. 

 

How to set aside the statutory demand?

Please help

 

 


 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 106
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Do you have any other debts ?

 

Do you own any assets e.g. House ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can get a DMP :) Its informal and also doesnt show up on your Credit Files per se. This will be a defaulted account so will be  shown on your CRA anyway. 

Lets deal with this Stat Demand for you...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Go here - This should help :)

 

 

 

It will point you in the right direction. So this is the first time its been "Sold" and no administered by an agency. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have studied the linked post to the detail.

 

It was the first time I think I received the notice of assignment from halifax

 

How can I ask creditor to set demand aside if only now I am going to ask for CCA?

Link to post
Share on other sites

And still not sure what to do? 

 

What did they send you? Can you scan it up minus personal info?

 

That means names and barcodes / Account refs etc

Link to post
Share on other sites

When did you orginally take out this credit card ? 

 

Did you contact Halifax concerning issues of hardship and not being able to make payments ?

 

Have you got copies of all statements from Halifax to see whether loads of excessive charges have been added ?

 

Have you got a copy of the default notice from Halifax that would have been sent to you, a month or two after you stopping making repayments ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

This was the last letter before statutory demand

image.jpg

 

This was Halifax letter posted by Intrum in their first letter, no barcodes

image.jpg

 

I took that card about 20 years ago.

i never contacted Halifax that I couldn’t pay.

i can’t remember about charges or default notice

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you have the Stat Demand Letter? 

 

20 Years ago? Fat chance they will have an agreement for it! Yikes... 

Before 2k7 - Recon from my understanding is not valid. A Card that old would have numerous T&C changes made to it which they would have to supply as part of their case. 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

what date is on the SD please

what date is on the attached letter left in your letterbox from the process server or the date he signed it?

he cant just leave it in your letterbox unless he can prove previous failure to deliver in person.

so what letters of recent have you from the process server?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Intrum SD for old HBOS credit card debt

He posted first class the second letter

 

He came in person as I found letter asking me to contact me without saying anything what was that about.

then he posted letter that he would deliver it on the 30th irrelevant if I am not there if I don’t agree other time.

 

then it was posted through letter box on the 30th without any date, stamp on envelope or date on statutory demand

Link to post
Share on other sites

what was the 1st letter please

scan it up to PDF only

read upload

 

forget that 

you made 2 posts I missed the 2nd.

 

so what date in on the SD please you have 18 days to respond.

 

dx

 [now merged]

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...