MET ANPR PCN - Overstay - service station - SOUTH GATE PARK, A120 Stansted Airport , CM24 1AA

[ericsbrother]

Now if the parking co sent the original NTK to the lease co, who named your employer who then named you as the driver then that would explain the delay in getting the notice and if they did the other bits right it would be correctly issued. that actually creates a problem for your employer as they arent allowed to name you as the driver without your permission and they cnat be liable as a company so should have just kept their big mouths shut.

 

Now the damand for £160 would be unlawful if they rely on keeper liability but as you ahev been named as the driver then they can try and enforce the charges if the siganeg makes it clear that these will apply and I doubt if the wording is good enough to specify exactly how this would be calculated.

 

SCS law are just another rentathreat as they are acting purely as a debt collector so dont panic over this letter. They may get paid to proceed further but at the moment there is no certainty to that.

 

Now what we would like to see is the signage at the site, esp as seen frok the entrance to the land from the public highway. Often the only signs are small ones scarreted about but nothing that can be read at 70mph as you pull off the dual carriageway (insufficient and inadequate signage).

 

Then check to see if they have planning permission for their cameras and signs. No PP and they are criminals and you cant enter into a criminal compact eveb if you wanted to. the local council will have the answers to that but it can be difficult getting them to understand what you are after as they may well confuse your request with signage for the facilities

Edited January 7, 2019 by honeybee13
Paras

[ericsbrother]

the sigange says see other signs for full conditions.

That means you havent been offered a contract but an "invitation to treat" so you cna decide you dont want to bother with their contract and still park there.

 

I will need better pictures of that sign so it is possible to read the small print

but if past cases are anything to go by they dont have a contract to breach unless you agree to it, this isnt the same as a proper offer of a unilateral contract via an advertisement.

 

They claim they dont even know they are advertising when you pull them up on the planning bit so are they lazy or stupid?

Edited January 7, 2019 by dx100uk
space/spell

[ericsbrother]

so that could be a "no they dont so we are looking into it" and if that is the case it doesnt matter whetehr they decide to enforce or not, they dont have PP- end of.

[ericsbrother]

So they dont have permission- end of story.

 

they will try and justify this under deemed consent but that isnt true as it is a different class for signs that are imformational or warning signs and these arent either, they are ADVERTYISING a unilateral contract.

 

The imformational signs are things that say "bus stop" or the name of a railway station or "fire exit".

Edited January 21, 2019 by dx100uk
spacing

[ericsbrother]

they dont have permission and that is that.

it would be a separate application as they wont have had the parking cowboys in place before they built it would they?

 

no need to look any further into this, now dig into other stuff regarding the siting of the signs so you can rubbish them on that if need be.

Edited January 21, 2019 by dx100uk
spacing

[ericsbrother]

it is quite common for people not to return to a thread it things just dont happen or they get a letter saying they have been let off as a GOGW or whatever.

We like to know what happed  as it helps us see what strategies the parking co's use and also what works for us and what doesnt so we can change our plans if necessary.

the BEAVIS decision stopped a very common defence in its tracks but we put more emphasis on others things that would have been very secondary consideratiosn a few years ago. the more a particular defence is successfully used the wider it becomes known and that creates more success as cases become persuasive y their very existence.