Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • @Man in the middle I've been searching the forum and you seem very knowledgeable. Would you mind giving a look at my query please? Thanks in advance!!
    • Thanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe concenquences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points?
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS had poll speculation FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

When is a "Trader" not a trader ??


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2160 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Recently bought an older car for the "Boss" and have had bother with it.

 

Guy I bought from refuses to repair the car which has developed an MOT failure problem on day 1.

 

Seller claims to be a private seller and advertised as such on Gumtree.

 

Found out this guy has a vehicle repair workshop of sorts and sells the odd vehicle mainly sourced from his brother who is a bona fide trader.

 

Am taking him to small claims court if he doesn't pay repair by local garage.

 

Beware motor traders in Kirkcaldy Fife, bearing the same name.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On the basis of what you say, he is a trader.

 

Make sure you describe him as such on your claim form.

 

Joe Blogs (a trader)

 

And then again in the body of the claim.

 

Also you are entitled to reject the car completely for a defect in the first 30 days

Link to post
Share on other sites

Depends as to why he had that car in the first place.

 

Chances are he bought it to tart up and sell on but will claim that he bought it for his wife and she didnt like it so sold it on.

as this sort of thing is as old as the hills no judge will be impressed with that so yes, he is a motor trader.

 

However, if it was his car for say a year then he has the same rights as anyone else to sell his personal property

but if the fault was there when you bought it he would have a hell of a job in claiming he didnt know about it,

being a professional mechanic and all that so still liable for making good or risk a claim for misrepresentation of the condition of the vehicle

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think from a legal point of view is that if the same said person can be proved to have sold more than 6 vehicles over 6 months then they are deemed to be a trader. I can't remember the exact numbers that trigger it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd love to see a link to the authority for this - but in the meantime I think that this is wrong.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well here's a start.

https://www.autotrader.co.uk/sell-my-car/frequently-asked-questions/trade-seller

 

And here's another perhaps a bit more informative.

https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&f=23&t=1085769

 

Whilst neither is official it does suggest that over 6 cars in a year and the sellar would be considered a trader.

 

And here as well:

http://www.tradingstandardswales.org.uk/prosecutions/2015JanMerthyr.cfm

 

Now this article is interesting as it implies a sale of approximately once a month is considered a trader as I originally pointed out and is a report on an official trading standards case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys. Fault is the coil pack which illuminated the engine management light----an MOT failure.

As you all know, this light can be temporarily put off by a computer----enough to not show at point of sale.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 “Trader” means a person acting for purposes relating to that person’s trade, business,craft or profession, whether acting personally or through another person acting in the trader’s name or on the trader’s behalf.

 

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?448203-2-Key-definitions-*

 

In previous legislation, the definition is referred to someone who deals in the course of business. This has always been interpreted by the courts is not being only the person's principal business, but in the course of any business.

 

For instance, a restaurant might sell off some of its equipment. Clearly it is not a catering equipment seller but if it sells off some of its equipment then that is considered to be a trade transaction and can fall within the protection of the Consumer Rights Act.

 

If you want specifically to talk about the trade in vehicles, then take as an example and ice cream seller who decides to sell his ice cream van. Clearly he is not a vehicle trader – but he sells his ice cream van and that would be classed as a trader the purposes of the act.

 

I think one could scarcely imagine an ice cream man selling six vehicles a year.

 

If the ice cream man sells his own personal car which he uses only for private purposes for his family then that sale is most unlikely to be considered as a trade sale.

 

I hope this clears it up

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...