Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • According to Alastair Campbell on Twitter, anti-Le Pen parties are pointing to RN's fiscal policies and saying they'll cause a 'Truss-style market meltdown'. Liz Truss charged taxpayers for Amazon Prime subscription - Mirror Online WWW.MIRROR.CO.UK The subscription costing £95 gives the ex-PM free shipping from the retail giant, as well as the ability to stream films and TV shows such as My Fault...  
    • Thank-you @BankFodder, your statement is a correct understanding of my position and I agree, it is actually really what I was looking for in starting this thread, as I too believed that the maximum I could claim for is that which I sold it for, even though this was substantially below market value at the time. And so, this sold value is what I shall be claiming for + the other expenses. @dx100uk I get your point, but this is just not what I want to expose myself to. Unfortunately I was one of the unlucky ones to have my details stolen in the Peoples Energy hack, and in 2020 I discovered that those details had been used to take out car insurance, and that the insured was then involved in a collision and my details were dragged through the mud. Despite Aviva cancelling the claim and treating as though it never were, even though I have the letters from them to say that they have removed this claim from the insurance database, I still get refused insurance and credit products to this day until I send across the letter from Aviva which explains that I was a victim of fraud. So you'll forgive me for not jumping up and uploading my data to a server utility for which I have no control over its retention policy, or where the server is located globally, its legal jurisdiction, or its security protocols.
    • Speeding (Revised 2017) – Sentencing (sentencingcouncil.org.uk)  
    • upload sites dont retain copies and so what if they do... what do you think they are going to do, kidnap your grannies budgie or something..how the hell would any of the info required by us be of any use to them..... stop being paranoid and put them all in one mass multipage pdf.  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

CCA requests sent - do I keep paying?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2237 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

Long time lurker here looking for some help please.

 

Thanks to the advice to others I have read here I have learned sooooo much!

 

I defaulted on three credit cards in 2008 and have been paying £1 per month to each since then. They have all been sold on multiple times.

 

Current situation:

MBNA £17000 now with Capquest

 

HSBC £3000 now with Robinson Way

 

MORGAN STANLEY £8000 now with Cabot.

 

I know I've been an idiot and it's all my own doing.

 

I sent all three Cca requests on monday, unsigned with POs.

What happens now?

 

My token payments are due on 17th - do I keep paying?

Thanks so much for any advice.

This site is brilliant!

Gettingmyselftogether (I'm giving it a shot anyway!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have 12+2 days to provide you with the CCA's, once they fail no pay.

 

Even if they write to you saying that they are requesting them from the OC doesn't matter, once the time is up, you can stop paying.

 

How much are these 'token' payments? I hope £1 a month?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, all £1 a month. I need to watch the calender then.

Thanks for replying!

 

Excellent WELL DONE!

 

(Apologies, I failed to read your post fully!!)

 

I make it 18th May when you should expect a response.....whilst the agreement is in place IMO I would make the payment on the 17th yes, once the 18th has passed and'or they fail to provide then you will be legally able to withhold all payments until such time they magic up the CCA's.

 

Did you take all of these out pre 2007?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So they must provide a copy of your signed agreement at the correct address for that time and the correct t&cs...pigs might fly here

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dx, if you're around, can you say why you think my debts might not be enforceable please?

 

I know you can't know about individual cases, but reading the threads here you know loads about cca requests and unenforceable debt, absolutely loads.

 

Since I read your "pigs might fly here" I've not stopped thinking that things might get better for me soon.

 

Do you really think - no guarantees I know - but do you think I might be in luck?

Thanks again.

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

In a nutshell...

 

Any agreement pre 2007 MUST be a copy of the 'ORIGINAL' because during 2007, they sorted their act out and realised consumers were wising up to their dirty tricks and asking for sight of the agreements, which most didn't have, due to their shocking filing.

 

Post 2007, most agreements are pretty watertight, some are taken out online, where a 'tick box' replaced signatures, AND new legislation came out which allowed them to produce a 'reconstructed' agreement (CCA) to make them enforceable in court.

 

Pre 07 without the 'original signed' CCA, means no legal action can be taken to recover the money, ie, no court because they would need to show the judge the original agreement (CCA).

 

The older the agreement, then the more chance you have of them having lost the original docs, and therefore increases the likelihood of them blagging it by claiming a recon is all they need to enforce.

 

This then puts you firmly in the driving seat.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Bazooka Boo, that's great and I appreciate your clarity. Still daring to hope but not counting my chickens yet.

 

I reckon I will sleep better tonight though.

 

I don't know where I'd be at the moment without this site.

 

Thanks for taking the time to help.

 

I really appreciate it.

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

In 99% of cases we find better than 90% of debts over 10 yrs old are cash cow accounts

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Paying a dca!!

 

In the dca milking parlour...cash cowed!!

 

No need to pay at all you got spoofed by threatograms

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...