Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, I'm wondering if someone can advise me on something. I'm appealing an order and have been asked to submit an appeal bundle and the below points are required to be included: 1) transcript of the judgment of the lower court on other record of reasons.  2) Statement of case. I'm wondering if anyone knows that "on other record of reasons" means. Also for statement of case would it just be a long document covering the reason for the claim, the findings of the lower court, why it was wrong and what I seek instead?   Thanks,
    • Hello, Thanks for the advice. I asserted my rights to reject and they accepted it and said they will refund me the full amount.  My question now is how long do they usually take to collect the vehicle? I've made it clear that I'm available for them to collect it whenever and I've been told its been passed on to the collections team. I chased it up today as its also raining heavily at the moment.  I just wondered if anyone had any experience on how long they usually take to collect? I'd obviously like it collected as soon as possible as I need to purchase another car.  Is it likely they will drag on the process of collection and what can I do if they do?  Thanks!
    • Why are FCA’s “name and shame” proposals causing a stir?View the full article
    • I am coming back to this thread after receiving a Single envelope containing 2 letters: 1 from Max Recovery telling me that my account was transferred to Drydens Fairfax in 2007 1 from Drydens Fairfax telling me that they are under instruction from their client to seek repayment.   These relate to a Barclays Overdraft from the early 00s, last payment through PayPlan was 04 June 2019, but neither of the letters are from Barclays themselves.   I have informed Drydens in both May 2019 and June 2023 of changes of address. No letters beyond a confirmation of the change and a request for finanical details have been received, which ive ignored.   What i was wanting to know is do i just ignore these as per previous advice? I know that i cant CCA an overdraft debt but what is the usual "plan" for dealing with old overdraft debts? Am i trying to run the clock down until June 2025 when it becomes statue barred?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Deductions from Earnings Order - DVLA Fine


johnny10hands
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2471 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just trying to help a colleague out at work.

 

Long story short.

 

- Car sold approx Sept last year - V5 sent to DVLA - No acknowledgement received

- One month later moved house

- Last months & this months wage packet shows unknown deductions

- 2 weeks of chasing answers - Found it relates to a fine for none notification of change of keeper for sold vehicle last year

- DVLA correspondence suspected to be posted to old address

- Believed that court got a different address from the DWP that colleague had never heard of let alone lived at.

- Colleague tracked down court and advised correct address - Summons then received to correct address this time.

- In court yesterday just to plead either guilty or not guilty to 'Knowing that the fine was issued' - Pleaded not guilty. Although it looks like the case has been 'set aside' for further correspondence history, and a further court date, the 3rd installment of the fine (which will total around £800) will be taken from next pay packet regardless.

- Payroll had NOT received an 'Attachment or Earnings order' so also know nothing.

 

My question is: Can they do this? as the chap in question had absolutely no idea this was going on until his wage slips were coming up short.

 

I have pointed him in the direction of this website for further reading and detailing.

 

I don't think the DVLA would care but surely a court would have a responsibility to ensure that they had all the correct information before going down this route?

 

Appalled to say the least

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just trying to help a colleague out at work.

 

Long story short.

 

- Car sold approx Sept last year - V5 sent to DVLA - No acknowledgement received

- One month later moved house

- Last months & this months wage packet shows unknown deductions

- 2 weeks of chasing answers - Found it relates to a fine for none notification of change of keeper for sold vehicle last year

- DVLA correspondence suspected to be posted to old address

- Believed that court got a different address from the DWP that colleague had never heard of let alone lived at.

- Colleague tracked down court and advised correct address - Summons then received to correct address this time.

- In court yesterday just to plead either guilty or not guilty to 'Knowing that the fine was issued' - Pleaded not guilty. Although it looks like the case has been 'set aside' for further correspondence history, and a further court date, the 3rd installment of the fine (which will total around £800) will be taken from next pay packet regardless.

- Payroll had NOT received an 'Attachment or Earnings order' so also know nothing.

 

My question is: Can they do this? as the chap in question had absolutely no idea this was going on until his wage slips were coming up short.

 

I have pointed him in the direction of this website for further reading and detailing.

 

I don't think the DVLA would care but surely a court would have a responsibility to ensure that they had all the correct information before going down this route?

 

Appalled to say the least

 

Assuming he has a driving licence, I further assume he told the DVLA he moved...

 

https://www.gov.uk/dvla-change-address

Link to post
Share on other sites

Assuming he has a driving licence, I further assume he told the DVLA he moved...

 

https://www.gov.uk/dvla-change-address

 

Yes he has a driving license but will have to ask whether he has notified them when he moved.

 

I have been looking at Attachment of Earnings Order (AEO) and comparing it to Deduction of Earnings Order (DEO). From what I have read, AEO's are issued by a court to an Employer, instructing them to make the deduction where a DEO can be sent to the employer WITHOUT a court order but it looks like this is just in relation to child support payments only (i.e not any other government body and certainly not in relation to a DVLA fine)

Link to post
Share on other sites

A DEO would still need to be notified to and actioned by your payroll. They will also need to undertake to make bank transfer for the deduction from pay to the beneficiary on the DEO.

 

Multiple government departments can issue a DEO without judicial oversight. I have one case ongoing with HMRC, to which my local MP is assisting. I will provide a vast ream of paperwork to the site team once progression is made. There are multiple disclosures made, and in the latest raft of benefits system dump, my NI number has been linked to another person, in a county I have never visited let lived in.

 

Whilst this was being investigated by HMRC, another department issued a DEO, after my MP on the same day was to!d no action would be taken in this manner. In the space of 2 days my payroll received an order to deduct, the next day a recension of the first!

 

In my position any ccj, court order etc is gross misconduct. Luckily HMRC made good on this error, and were very apologetic.

 

Didnt mean to hijack, but these types have statute power from multiple government departments.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...