Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I live in a student house, with 5 tenants, unihomes is our utilities provider, who we each have a direct debit set up with and have paid each bill every month. Two letters were sent in my name by BWLegal saying I had two outstanding payments due adding up to over £3500, I have tried to contact british gas (as that is apparently our houses provider) as well as Unihomes. Nothing has helped and BWlegal are pursuing legal action if these debts are not resolved by the 1st May. What do I do? I've called Bwlegal when i bring up that the debt isnt for me and for unihomes they hang up on me. so I am stressed and do not know what to do
    • cant do either if its not in a public place or on your land. dx  
    • scared of what? you simply jumped at turnstile.... it's not a prison sentence and done very doubtfully of any criminal. exuberance of youth stupid act at very very worst it will be a warning letter if anything ever happens ..means nothing going fwd. dx          
    • Hi, everyone. I received a letter from TfL investigator/Prosecutor. The letter reads as follow:   ''Thank you for responding to our enquiry letter. Your comments will be taken into consideration when reviewing whis case and we will contact you as soon as we have reached a decision. TfL now consider prosecution against passengers who are in breach of all TfL byelaw offences and I must inform you that further legal action may be taken. TfL byelaws can be found at ... Please do not hesitate to contact me if I can assist you further.''   The letter was sent 23 days after I replied to them. Should I send another begging letter to IAP? I'm extremely scared now. Thanks all.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Credit Agreements and Data Protection Act


stiffnuts
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6365 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Anyone with expertise in the Data Protection Act assist with the following.

 

Can you make a section 7 DPA request with reference to your credit agreement. (Totally forget about the consumer credit act 1974).

 

I appreciate its a manual record and the requirements may therefore differ.

 

Anyone know?

 

Here is a link for section 7 for people to read

Data Protection Act 1998

Remember if you find anything I say helpful, please click the scales

 

 

tbern123 vs Cabot

  1. Cabot again !!! Urgent Help Needed
  2. Litigation - tbern123 V Cabot Financial (Uk) Limited
  3. No more calls from Cabot... lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

What is being stated is that companies instead of constantly hiding behind the Data Protection Act & referring you to the CRA they used are required to tell you why you have been refused credit or for that matter any other service.

 

Jon, have you answered a question from another thread... What stiffnuts is saying is, taking the CCA out of consideration do DCA's have to provide copies of agreements under the Data Protection Act.

 

In relation to what you have said though... Each company uses a difference method to first credit score people, then credit search them...

 

Anyway, most companies have a minium limit when performing a credit score for example, three years is the magic number for time with employer, time with bank and time at address. They don't fully disclose how they do it as it would make it easier for people to cheat the system....

Remember if you find anything I say helpful, please click the scales

 

 

tbern123 vs Cabot

  1. Cabot again !!! Urgent Help Needed
  2. Litigation - tbern123 V Cabot Financial (Uk) Limited
  3. No more calls from Cabot... lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

The simple answer is yes they do.

A Data Protection Act request should illicit ALL documents/records, including agreements, forms, letters, emails, memos, computer records which relate to you & your dealings with the company. I would however suggest that it's important, for the avoidance of doubt, a specific mention is made regarding the agreement in the DPA request.

 

As to the other yes they may not disclose how they reach their decisions but it appears they should if demanded & not pass the buck by quoting the DPA (how ironic is that) & referring the subject to the CRA

Link to post
Share on other sites

The simple answer is yes they do.

A Data Protection Act request should illicit ALL documents/records, including agreements, forms, letters, emails, memos, computer records which relate to you & your dealings with the company. I would however suggest that it's important, for the avoidance of doubt, a specific mention is made regarding the agreement in the Data Protection Act request.

 

As to the other yes they may not disclose how they reach their decisions but it appears they should if demanded & not pass the buck by quoting the DPA (how ironic is that) & referring the subject to the CRA

 

Agreed- the request would have to be made as a Subject Access Request with the pre-requisite £10 fee enclosed. I have found out some useful information which I wasn't expecting to when sending SARs.

 

It begs the question really, if the DCAs are expected to abide by original agreements, why they hardly ever already have them on file even when the debt has been sold to them and continually have to approach the original creditor for the documentation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agreed- the request would have to be made as a Subject Access Request with the pre-requisite £10 fee enclosed. I have found out some useful information which I wasn't expecting to when sending SARs.

 

It begs the question really, if the DCAs are expected to abide by original agreements, why they hardly ever already have them on file even when the debt has been sold to them and continually have to approach the original creditor for the documentation.

 

Following on from this then the agreement would have to be sent with your signature as this would be classed as persoanl data. However Would there be an issue of whther the agreement was stored in a relevant manual filing system?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Following on from this then the agreement would have to be sent with your signature as this would be classed as persoanl data. However Would there be an issue of whther the agreement was stored in a relevant manual filing system?

 

The Durrant ruling made a mockery of the DPA & is considered by most as bad law & data controllers have been advised not to rely on it The view appears to be emerging that most if not all systems are relevant for the purposes of the act

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...