Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for your pointers - much appreciated. dx100uk - Apologies, my request wasn't for super urgent advice and I have limited online access due to my long working hours and caring obligations - the delay in my response doesn't arise in any way from disrespect or ingratitude. I will speak to her at the weekend and see if she will open up a bit more about this, and allow me to submit the subject access request you advise - the original creditor is 118 118 loans and from the letter I saw (which prompted the conversation and the information) the debt collection agency had bought the debt from 118 and were threatening enforcement which is when she has made a payment arrangement with them for an amount of £180 per month. It looks as if she queried matters at the time (so I wonder if I might with the FIO request get access to their investigation file?) - the letter they wrote said "The information that you provided has been carefully considered and reviewed. After all relevant enquiries were made it has been confirmed that there is not enough evidence present to conclusively prove that this application was fraudulent.  However, we have removed the interest as a gesture of goodwill. As a result of the findings, you will be held liable for the capital amount on the loan on the basis of the information found during the investigation and you will be pursued for repayment of the loan agreement executed on 2.11.2022 in accordance with Consumer Credit Act 1974"  The amount at that time was over £3600 in arrears, as no payments had been made on it since inception and I think she only found out about it when a default notice came in paper form. I'm a little reluctant to advise her to just stop paying, and would like to be able to form a view in relation to her position and options before unsetting the applecart - do you think this is reasonable? She is young and inexperienced with these things and getting into this situation has brought about a lot of shame regarding inability to sort things out/stand up for herself, which is one of the reasons I have only found out about this considerably later Thank you once again for your advice - it is very much appreciated.    
    • That's fine - I'm quite happy to attend court if necessary. The question was phrased in such a way that had I declined the 'consideration on the papers' option, I would have had to explain why I didn't think such consideration was appropriate, and since P2G appear to be relying on a single (arguably flawed) issue, I thought it might result in a speedier determination.
    • it was ordered in the retailers store  but your theory isnt relevant anyway, even if it fitted the case... the furniture is unfit for purpose within 30 days so consumer rights act overwrites any need to use 14 days contract law you refer too. dx  
    • Summary of the day from the Times. I wasn't watching for a couple of interesting bits like catching herself out with her own email. Post Office inquiry: Paula Vennells caught out by her own email — watch live ARCHIVE.PH archived 23 May 2024 11:57:02 UTC  
    • Frankly I think you should go to a hearing unless you feel especially nervous . If you have any worries then you should follow our link to find out about a county court familiarisation visit     You shouldn't forget that county Court judgements are very helpful but they are not binding. They are only persuasive.  It is difficult to see you losing but it might be better to be there in order to counter any arguments from the other side
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Marsh finance poss repossession help thanks


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2618 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi trying to keep it short.

 

I have a HP agreement with Marsh finance.

Had the car since November 2014 and all payments were made without fail.

Split with my ex partner, who left me with considerable debt some of which I knew nothing about.

 

Well ended up with short term financial issues and have missed 3 payments with the above.

 

I have tried to get them to a repayment plan of the arrears,

which are around £770 but are having none of it and now In the process of gaining possession via court order.

 

I need the car to get my daughter to school and me to work

and quite frankly from what I can make out I would end up in more financial difficulties if they did take the car.

 

I would be grateful if anyone can provide any help on either how to get them to agree a payment plan

(surely they aren't adhering to the FCA treating customers fairly or attempting to reduce debt)

or if this can be stopped at court?

 

Thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jaysa

 

Thanks for coming to CAG, We need more info.

 

How much have you paid out of the total amount? etc

The guys will be along shortly.

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

have they sent you a default notice?

are they stating they are going to court to get a return of goods order?

 

 

you say you took the agreement out nov 14

for how long does it last

i'e have you paid more than the 1/3rd mark?

 

 

stay OFF THE PHONE to them too please

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi yes I've paid approx 40% so over the 1/3 mark. I've had default notice.

 

I have also received notice of termination of the agreement and the latest is that I either pay in full or they will issue court proceedings.

 

I am corresponding via email so everything is in writing.

 

An email has just been received asking if I can discharge the arrears over the next 2 months. This would be a horrendous struggle but doesn't appear they want to take notice.

 

Thanks for the replies

Link to post
Share on other sites

issue what court proceedings are they saying what type

a return of goods order?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nope they do not mention what type of order just that they will be issuing unless I pay the full amount that's left on the account ( plus large amount of fees) or voluntarily return the car ( which I'm not doing!!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

well fees are unlawful and will be removed or reclaimed.

 

 

it will be probable that a time order might be your only route.

 

 

they have terminated so unless you can convince them to reopen the agreement that's your only route as far as I can see.

 

 

play hardball !!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

have a read here:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?471026-Moneybarn-Court-hearing-in-3-weeks

 

 

but you want ALL PENALTY FEES removed before you agree

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are charging interest daily at £7 ish.

 

So I would still need a time order even though I've paid over a third? I'm guessing this is done once I've had court papers?

 

Thanks so much really helps

 

Ignore me I've had a quick read thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

They cant have it both ways, if they have terminated then there is no contract to allow them to apply any fees or interest until a court says otherwise.

 

They are ramping it up so you give in to whatever they demand, and they hope that you dont look too carefully into this.

 

So, read the finance agreement very carefully before you say or do anything else.

 

Let the wise people here know what iit says about fees and charges etc

and someone will tell you how to respond to put the brakes on this

Link to post
Share on other sites

They cant have it both ways, if they have terminated then there is no contract to allow them to apply any fees or interest until a court says otherwise.

 

They are ramping it up so you give in to whatever they demand, and they hope that you dont look too carefully into this.

 

So, read the finance agreement very carefully before you say or do anything else.

 

Let the wise people here know what iit says about fees and charges etc

and someone will tell you how to respond to put the brakes on this

 

Very interesting thank you!!! im going to get all paper work out and check everything before

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you formally written to them asking them to allow you to repay the arrears over the remaining term of the agreement ? this would be useful as it could be submitted with your defence of any court claim they issue - shows the judge you tried to come to an arrangement, if they refuse it puts them in a bad light.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you formally written to them asking them to allow you to repay the arrears over the remaining term of the agreement ? this would be useful as it could be submitted with your defence of any court claim they issue - shows the judge you tried to come to an arrangement, if they refuse it puts them in a bad light.

 

Hi I sent an email giving a break down of my incoming and outgoings and an offer of repayment that was affordable. It wasn't over the rest of the term but a lot quicker. I'm going to sort the paperwork out today properly and will come back with what I've received. Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...