Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Insurance cancellation passed onto DCA.


thedryad
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2671 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I cancelled my vehicle insurance over the phone and was told that there was nothing more to pay, which surprised me as I thought there would be a cancellation fee, even though it was only 6 weeks until the policy ended.

 

I then received a letter in PDF format via e-mail stating that I had cancelled my policy with a breakdown of how much I'd paid etc and then it stated that there was a NIL BALANCE. It was signed.

 

I then received another letter in the same format telling me I had to pay a cancellation fee of over £150! I phoned them and they said that this was an error.

 

2 months later I received a letter from a "Solicitors" (DCA) saying that I owed this amount plus fees.

 

I phoned them and explained, and then e-mailed them with the attached PDF stating I owed nothing.

 

They then replied saying that because the letter stated at the bottom "this is subject to change" then the debt is enforceable but they would speak to the OC and get back to me.

 

They have got back to me saying that the original letter was an error and that I do owe the amount stated.

 

Here is a copy of my e-mails to them and the ones they have sent back.

 

 

"Dear Ms XXXX

*

Further to your recent email, we have been in contact with the client and this is the response we have received:*

*

'The letter attached to your original email was incorrect, this letter was followed by the attached letter advising of the outstanding balance'*

*

Please see attached document.*

*

You have an outstanding balance, therefore please contact us on 01707 XXXX to discuss payment methods, quoting your reference number:*XXXX

 

Kind Regards,

*

Insurance Collections Bureau. "

 

 

My reply to them.

 

"Dear sirs,

*

I have spoken to my solicitor about this and showed him the attached.

*

He has advised me that, although the original creditor states it is an error, one cannot just send out a letter stating that there is no debt, and then simply decide that there is. The letter is signed and dated.

*

I therefore consider the matter closed and any further correspondence from you will incur a*charge of £12.50*for my time. However if you would like to discuss this further with my solicitor, Mr. Andrew XXXXXXXX, would you be happy to contact him directly in writing?

*

Regards, "

Their reply:

 

"Thank you for your recent email.

 

With regards to this, I advise you or your solicitor to contact the client directly as we have advised you of their response, we will continue with our process until advised otherwise by the client.*

 

Additionally, we do not have a contract with you, therefore you cannot charge us anything.

 

Kind Regards,"

My question is, shall I ignore them for now? Or just send them an invoice straight away? I don't believe I owe them anything at all.

Also I am considering sending them a section 40 notice (administration of justice act) but I will of course be sending that by recorded post.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Suggest you send a final response but to the Insurance companies head office, that they confirmed twice that there was nil owed following cancellation and that you are extremely angry about the way you have been treated by them. Advise that you feel they have totally failed to observe requirements under Treating Customers Fairly and obligations under FCA ICOBS. Advise them that unless they cease this harassment, you will have no alternative but to make a complaint to the FOS and send a copy to the FCA for their review.

 

I should imagine that if you do that, they will write it off.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks.

 

I was just about to attach a copy of the letter they sent stating NIL balance, which I believe is more than sufficient in backing me up.

 

This DCA claiming to be solicitors I shall cease contact with then.

 

I strongly doubt that they have any grounds for further action. Though I will add that my calculations would suggest I did owe more when I cancelled, so I did think that they were wrong but surely going back on saying that I owed nothing and then changing their minds is a bit ridiculous?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The point is that all Insurers have to comply with ICOBS e.g rules about clarity of communication, standards of accounting. If they are sending out letters confirming nil owed after cancellation and then sending debt collection letters, this is a failure of their processes and not up to standards required by the FCA.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only acceptable reason to a change from this document, is if you cancelled the Direct Debit payment and therefore the assumption of what had been paid is incorrect. That is why it says subject to change. Otherwise it should be correct.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, well when I cancelled she said on the phone that there was no more to pay.

Then I received this letter, and then they sent another letter saying that I did owe money.

Solicitor friend says that the letter saying I own NIL with a signature on it is enough.

Link to post
Share on other sites

make me laugh these companies how they think they can one minute say you owe nil, 0, zilch then turn around weeks later and state you owe a £150 cancellation fee, im no professional on these matters but keep all the letters they sent to you i cant see it going far for them

 

perfectly happy to offer you a service, usually pester you to sign up with them but when you decide its time to call it a day, they shaft you side ways, wash there hands of the whole affair and then let some other pestering harassing company do the dirty work for them

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...