Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

online scam


badboy09
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2669 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there , just looking for a little info in regards to a recent claim i put in to santander and wondering what the outlook may be ?

 

I joined an online REVSHARE business called " MY ADVERTISING PAYS " back in march 2015 , and this was the first program i had got involved in when i started network marketing online ,

 

i invested about 4-5 grand in this business over a period of about 18 months ,

the idea of this business was that for every credit pack i bought costing $50 i would receive $60 back , ( yes i was gullible and believed this) as it looked legit at the time ,

 

i had now managed to purchase 235 of these packs over a period of time ,

i was earning roughly $100 off this program ,

 

when it came to the time i wanted to withdraw

, they then turned the option off ,

leaving thousands worldwide with mass losses ,

 

i contacted santander , and put a claim in that i didnt receive the service i had signed up for , and would like them to put a fraud claim in so i could claim the funds back ,

 

i used my visa debit card to do all these transactions ,

over the time period ,

 

they have since closed down " MY ADVERTISING PAYS" and reopened it as " THE ADVERT PLATFORM " and started doing the same again !!

 

what are the chances of me getting any of the money back ??

 

ty in advance

 

badboy09

Link to post
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it looks like a Ponzi scheme (almost said the sc word that rhyms with ham, but the site autoedits that!), but the promoter says "no, it's not!" : look at the scheme itself.

 

Does it rely on new joiners to create the revenue being paid out? Clearly.

 

(Not essential but a 'warning flag'; does it tempt existing members to "re-invest" their "gains"?). This one seems to have done so.

 

Your own maths tells the tale.

235 packs bought at $50 : $1175.

 

Yet you believe you "invested" 4-5,000.

Even if that was $4k instead of £4k (keeping the figures as low as possible) where did the extra $2825 come from?!

 

So, I suspect any claim you could make would be limited to the $1175, but even then : you were buying into a business, albeit a Ponzi one.

 

I suspect Santander will say "you were buying a service with risks,and that is what you got", in denial of any claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ty bazza , yes it was a foolish and costly one , the reason i said $4k was because it was , the way it works is this , you buy a credit pack it lasts for 90 days , then expires but it pays you $60 from the $50 you invested , and with the amount of packs i had i had quite a few expiring and then i was using the $60 i made and investing it into another credit pack , if that makes sense , i have had way more than 235 over the period of time i was in it , but its hard to calculate when packs drop off ( expired) and then when other ones are bought , when i spoke to santander they had amassed all the payments i ever made to this company and its roughly 4 grand there and abouts , and yes it did rely for you to bring in referrals to the business to , it sounded very appealing at the beginning when they showed you how easy it was to earn money , and it had been around for a couple of years as well , might as well take it as a lesson learned i guess :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

You still haven't lost 4 grand.

 

You've bought 4 grands worth over the whole period.

 

However, they've "paid out" for the ones that expired and got paid before the pyramid collapsed!

Why should you be considering claiming for the one's you bought and got paid out for, (regardless of what you then chose to do with that money!)

 

Your claim should focus on what you bought and didn't get paid out for (but even then I don't rate that claim's chances!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...