Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • ACI are part of the Perch Capital group along with TM legal.  
    • Thanks jk2054 - email now sent to OCMC requesting an in person hearing.
    • You can easily argue your case with no sign on the nearest parking sign
    • Same issue got a fine yesterday for parking in suspended bay which was ending at 6:30 yesterday, next thing I see a fine 15 minutes before it. The sign was obstructed 
    • Hi all, an update on the case as the deadline for filing the WS is tomorrow i.e., 14 days before the hearing date: 7th June. Evri have emailed their WS today to the court and to myself. Attached pdf of their WS - I have redacted personal information and left any redactions/highlights by Evri. In the main: The WS is signed by George Wood. Evri have stated the claim value that I am seeking to recover is £931.79 including £70 court fees, and am putting me to strict proof as to the value of the claim. Evri's have accepted that the parcel is lost but there is no contract between Evri and myself, and that the contract is with myself and Packlink They have provided a copy of the eBay Powered By Packlink Terms and Conditions (T&Cs) to support their argument the contractual relationship is between myself and Packlink, highlighting clause 3a, e, g of these T&Cs. They further highlight clause 14 of the T&Cs which states that Packlink's liability is limited to £25 unless enhanced compensation has been chosen. They have contacted Packlink who informed them that I had been in contact with Packlink and raised a claim with Packlink and the claim had been paid accordingly i.e., £25 in line with the T&Cs and the compensated postage costs of £4.82. They believe this is clear evidence that my contract is with Packlink and should therefore cease the claim against Evri. Evri also cite Clause 23 of the pre-exiting commercial agreement between the Defendant and Packlink, which states:  ‘Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 A person who is not a party to this Agreement shall have no rights under the Contracts (Right of Third Parties) Act 1999 to rely upon or enforce any term of this Agreement provided that this does not affect any right or remedy of the third party which exists or is available apart from that Act.’ This means that the Claimant cannot enforce third party rights under the Contract (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 and instead should cease this claim and raise a dispute with the correct party.   Having read Evri's WS and considered the main points above, I have made these observations: Evri have not seen/read my WS (sent by post and by email) as they would have recognised the claim value is over £1000 as it includes court fees, trial fees, postage costs and interests, and there is a complete breakdown of the different costs and evidence. Evri accepts the parcel is lost after it entered their delivery network - again, this is in my WS and is not an issue in dispute. Evri mentions the £25 and £4.82 paid by Packlink - Again, had they read the WS, they would have realised this is not an issue in dispute. Furthermore to the eBay Powered By Packlink T&Cs that Evri is referring to, Clauses 3b and c of the T&Cs states:  (b)   Packlink is a package dispatch search engine that acts as an intermediary between its Users and Transport Agencies. Through the Website, Users can check the prices that different Transport Agencies offer for shipments and contract with the Transport Agency that best suits their needs on-line. (c)  Each User shall then enter into its own contract with the chosen Transport Agency. Packlink does not have any control over, and disclaims all liability that may arise in contracts between a User and a Transport Agency   This supports the view that once a user (i.e, myself) selects a transport agency (i.e Evri) that best suits the user's needs, the user (i.e, myself) enters into a contract with the chosen transport agency (i.e, myself). Therefore, under the T&Cs, there is a contract between myself and Evri. Evri cites their pre-existing agreement with Packlink and that I cannot enforce 3rd party rights under the 1999 Act. Evri has not provided a copy of this contract, and furthermore, my point above explains that the T&Cs clearly explains I have entered into a contract when i chose Evri to deliver my parcel.  As explained in my WS, i am the non-gratuitous beneficiary as my payment for Evri's delivery service through Packlink is the sole reason for the principal contract coming into existence. Clearly Evri have not read by WS as the above is all clearly explained in there.   I am going to respond to Evri's email by stating that I have already sent my WS to them by post/email and attach the email that sent on the weekend to them containing my WS. However, before i do that, If there is anything additional I should further add to the email, please do let me know. Thanks. Evri Witness Statement Redacted v1 compressed.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Issue with the Builder


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2732 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

HI All,

 

 

I am at my wits end with my builder with whom I signed a contract agreeing the scope of work and duration of work (8 weeks). I am in the 8th week of the contract and the work completion is not in sight. He has delayed the work all along sighting every possible reason and I am genuinely concerned that the work will not be over by the end of the week.

Do I have legal recourse against the builder ? Any possible help/guidance you can provide will be greatly appreciated. Happy to provide any more information if required.

 

 

Many thanks,

Swaroop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Were any penalties written into the contract should the work run over the 8 weeks?

Have there been any extenuating circumstances beyond the builders control causing any delay?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, you do have recourse against the builder. However, before we can suggest your options, I think that we need to know a lot more about the building project, the contract, have you made any payments? What are the arrangements for paying? Who's the builder? Is it a sole trader or an established company?

 

No doubt there will be more questions but we may as well try this for starters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately there are no penalty causes mentioned in the contract. I frankly did not anticipate the situation coming to this. regarding the circumstances, I would not believe that these are excruciating circumstances beyond builder's control (for eg : my car broke down that's why I could not come, it was someone's b'day that's why he did not come today etc).

 

 

This is a side extension being done on a chalet house. There were 4 payment schedules mentioned in the contract (with the final installment to be paid after the work completion) based on the level of work to be completed in each schedule. I have promptly paid every scheduled payment (3 payments have been paid so far) via same day bank transfer. This is a sole trader ( having a company registered under his name ) and based on what I have seen, its mostly his relatives who work for him.

Happy to provide Builders name if that helps too ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately there are no penalty causes mentioned in the contract. I frankly did not anticipate the situation coming to this. regarding the circumstances, I would not believe that these are extenuating circumstances beyond builder's control (for eg : my car broke down that's why I could not come, it was someone's b'day that's why he did not come today etc).

Link to post
Share on other sites

With all building work I always say to take the builder's time estimate and double it.

Unfortunately it's near impossible to make builders stick to schedule because they take other jobs to avoid gaps.

That given that everything goes smoothly, without anything wrong being discovered during construction (collapsed pipes, rats nest, lead water pipes, skeletons, etc.)

Link to post
Share on other sites

So you are saying that he is operating as a limited liability company?

 

What is the state of play as regards the payments at the moment? Are you up to date? Do you owe him money? Does he owe you money?

Link to post
Share on other sites

But surely, the builder would have taken contingency and buffer into consideration before going into a contract and providing a timeline ? Having said that, I do understand that unforeseen circumstances can come into play but the least you would expect in such cases is for the builder to keep you aware of such situations. Unfortunately I have not received a single call from my builder advising of progress (or for that matter highlighting any issues !). hence my frustration.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes he is operating as a limited liability company.

 

 

With regards to payment, I am up to date on the payment as per schedules in the contract (have paid him 20K from 24k).

So 4K still needs to be paid to him but he has not reached that stage in the construction where I should pay him the outstanding. ( as per contract 3K to be paid after work completion).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I think that you are in a very difficult position. Financially it seems that the work is nearly finished. It's a very big job. As he has been paid most of the money for the work that he has done so far, he could feasibly walk off the job if he got annoyed and then essentially hold you to ransom. Bringing a new builder onto the job to finish somebody else's work will probably end up costing more than you had originally agreed to pay the first builder.

 

It was certainly very good move to agree to hold back £3000 to be paid after completion. Most people don't even do this – but I have to say that quite frankly, it's not enough. You should probably have insisted on holding back 1/3.

 

There is all sorts of action you could take – including the threat of legal action but it seems to me that the builder is in the commanding position here – and it sounds as if he knows it as well. We can advise you on all sorts of formal action that you could start to take that it seems to me that the best thing to do is to try and go along with it, grit your teeth and get as much of the work done as possible and then think about withholding money at the end.

 

In order to support this, you would have to be able to show a paper trail – with you writing to him and pointing out the delays in asking him when he's going to come back onto the site and finish the job. I think also that you need to make sure that you have got a detailed schedule of all the times and dates that he has worked – and not worked so that if eventually it does become a formal dispute, then you have some kind of paper evidence to show what you have had to put up with.

 

I must say that I don't like to give this kind of advice which sounds really as if I'm suggesting that you give into the situation – but I think that you would take a big risk if you decide to stand up to him at this particular point in time.

 

If you do decide to take a stand, then before you do so I would make a very careful appraisal of what work is being done, what work is left to do, and make an assessment of how much it would cost to get that work done by somebody else.

 

It might even be worth getting another builder round to have a look and give you an estimate. If you find that the cost of completing the work is broadly the same as the money that is outstanding on the job then that puts you back into control and you can then go to the builder and tell him that if he doesn't finish within seven days that he is going to be taken off the job.

 

Certainly, if you decide to terminate him then you must do it in writing, explain very carefully the reason why you are terminating him and give him an opportunity to get back onto the job and finish it properly. Seven days notice is probably okay.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...