Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 12mph (beyond any UK limit) will certainly qualify for a Fixed Penalty. So you should received an offer of a FP for each of the remaining two offences. Be sure to submit your licence details as instructed when you accept the offer. If you don't your £100 will be returned to you and the police will prosecute you in court.
    • and it will be also now written off under age related criteria anyway.
    • @dx100ukThanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe consequences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points? @Man in the middleI've been searching the forum and you seem very knowledgeable. Would you mind giving a look at my query please? Thanks in advance!!
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS had poll speculation FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Early vacation of rented property due to terminal illness - Anything I can do?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2856 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just wondering if any of you could tell me where we stand with this one.

 

My elderly father has terminal cancer and wanted to move 250 miles to be closer to us, we initially tried to get him into a nursing home but found this difficult due to the homes needing to assess him first. The only option we had was to sign a tenancy agreement (in our name due to him being 250 miles away) with my father as the named tenant.

 

As expected he was unable to care for himself and within 4 weeks we were able to move him into a nursing home.

 

The tenancy was an assured shorthold taken out from the 1st June 2016 for 6 months.

 

We paid deposits (which I have never recieved a TDS reference for) and we paid the entire 6 months rent due up front as this was the only way we could secure the property quickly.

 

We kept the estate agents in the loop and they knew the situation from the outset, we had the property cleaned and handed the keys back into them on the 26th June.

 

I last contacted the estate agents on the 3rd August and have been told that the property is now under offer (as in being sold not rented again) but because the sale is not likely to complete within our tenancy period which ends 30th November we will not get any of our pre-paid rental money back.

 

They have also refused to give back our deposit money until the tenancy ends even though we no longer have access to the property and they were happy with it's condition when we gave the keys back.

 

Now on face value, I do know that technically we are liable for the 6 months rental but I'm hoping you may be able to direct me here as to what (if anything) I can do?

 

Many thanks in advance for any advice/help you can offer

Dydie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dydie, ive flagged the post for thise more experienced in this area, they will be along soon

Thankyou for your patience

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dydie, are you saying you offered 'early surrender' which LL accepted?

Handing keys back does not nec indicate Legal termination of Tenancy, you may have handed keys over to LA so they could 'keep an eye on the property' to protect your interest whilst absent for >3 weeks.

You could sue for return of deposit in SCC, the Judge may take a different view.

Deposit should not be released until Tenancy is legally vacated.

Write to LL direct and explain your situation & LA's actions.

I do not doubt your veracity, but many Ts do concoct a story to get out of a binding AST early. Perhaps this is the LA's way of testing for this possibility, or he may have other (financial) considerations eg LL commission.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mariner51

Yes it was an early surrender, all done properly and above board. The flat which was rented is one of these over 60's complexes (private not council run), the Agents (and the LL) knew the situation from the outset in terms of my father being terminally ill, they were aware that he probably wouldn't be there for the full term, in fact I have those conversations in writing via email, I also have communication via email regarding handing the property back to them, they said in advance that if Dad did leave early they would market the flat for rental and if let would refund any excess payment. They have obviously now changed plans and marketed for sale (now under offer).

Dydie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quick addition to the above ... I have just "googled" surrender of tenancy and just wanted to clarify what happened ... we did not specifically use that term, but I contacted the agents (in writing) to say as expected Dad needed to go into a nursing home and we would be vacating on the 26th June, and I asked if they could advise what I needed to do in terms of handing back keys etc. They responded and told me what to do with keys and that the LL would be visiting the property to carry out an inspection, due to running around like a headless chicken for the next few days I didn't get chance to drop the keys in (though they had their own set) and the agents then chased me a few days later asking for the keys to be dropped in as they were needed for viewings.

Could I argue that them chasing me to hand back keys constitutes acceptance of early surrender?

 

Just to add - we have never received a copy of the signed contracts, we went in to the agents and signed our part but they had not been signed by the LL so the agent said they would get signed and forward a copy (they never have)

Dydie

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was 'an offer of early surrender' for which LL can decline consent, or accept on his terms. It appears the latter, he will accept your early surrender provided you remain resp for property until accep. new T found, (standard). Not sure how a sale would affect this as most private retirement homes are sold Leasehold.

Any question over deposit protection MAY provide you with a bargaining chip with LL, but at end of Lease (6 months) you are free of Property liabilities.

The adage here should have been 'Look before you leap'. Sorry

My mantra is always 'Negotiate'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dydie, a way of getting some of the money back might be if there was an exchange of contracts (or better still completion) before 30 Nov. You have no contract with the buyer of the property. Also even if your father was not living in the flat it still ought to have been available for your use. You had paid for it after all. I would try to find out the progress of the sale without asking the estate agent !

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...