Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Medical Negligence?


tellison
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3064 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

Everyone I tell my story to is telling me to seek legal advice and look to make a claim for what has happened to me.

 

In November last year I damaged my knee and immediately went to the local community hospital who referred me to A and E at the bigger hospital.

 

The doctor greeted me and went over my X-RAY which showed no signs of bone breakages or clear damage. He then did a few other tests asking myself to move in different places and after the normal ligament tests he then said to me 'he hopes its not meniscus damage and then proceeded to get another member off staff, my guess for a second opinion.

 

He was introduced as a 'specialist' and was very rude and abrupt. He then put me in significant pain, by far the worst feeling I have ever experienced. He then raised his voice numerous times at me commanding me to RELAX my leg which was PHYSICALLY and mentally impossible, he never even said he was about to put me in pain.

 

I had to push him off away due to the pain he caused myself. He then walked off and muttered a 'diagnosis' of bruised and that it will heal within a week or so.

 

 

 

Baring in mind I could NOT straighten my leg, it had locked. I then rang my GP on Monday as a emergency appointment who did some tests (similar to the original doctor) and then came to the conclusion that I have done some serious damage to my knee, he then referred me to a specialist (a real one) on emergency admission who performed tests that again put me in 0 pain.

 

He came to the conclusion that I HAVE meniscus damage and a 'urgent' MRI was required. Within 2 weeks I have had a operation to repair the damage which was initially missed....

 

My issues are :-

 

1. The amount of pain I was put in (no other doctor did the same) and I have never felt ANYTHING like it (broken bones and obviously done severe damage to my knee)

2. The diagnosis - If the original doctor stuck with his thought of meniscus damage I would of potentially had a MRI that evening.

3. The anxiety and stress caused from the doctor, I have had nightmares about him (sounds stupid but its true)

 

Do you think I should take this further? I keep being urged to do so, even by a medical professional. But feel I will just get it thrown back in my face.

 

Thank's for any advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome to CAG

 

I'm no expert but my initial gut feeling is that all you are likely to get is an apology.

 

1 It seems the damage was already done when you damaged your knee. Trying to find out whether the doctors actions made it worse will be difficult.

 

2 Based on the original doctors assumptions this may have led to an MRI, the evidence firstly seen may not have been enough to confirm. While it is no use to you MRIs are very expensive and doctors will only use them where they absolutely needed. It may even be that even if the 'specialist' hadn't manipulated your knee, the damage and pain may have manifested itself over the next couple of days.

 

3 Have you spoken to your GP about this? Counselling may help but to be frank, time is a better healer.

 

I would suggest raising this with the hospital first (via PALS if you choose) and see where that gets you. If you go with an ambulance chaser, expect to lose quite a lot as well.

 

Sorry if that is not what you want to hear and as I say, I'm no expert but that is my honest opinion.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

I (too) agree.

 

I suspect you can distill this into 2 issues :

1) your feelings about the behaviour of the initial 'specialist'

2) did you suffer any harm by the MRI 'delay'?

 

Re: 2) first. MRI's need to be life changing / life threatening to be performed urgently. I can't see how you would have had one "that evening". So, you won't get far complaining that the attitude of the initial specialist caused you not to get an MRI that evening .....

 

1) : If no harm resulted, any claim for negligence would fail, so you could go down the PALS route rather than the 'legal claim' route.

expect to get (at most) an apology.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Again , no expert here but I doubt very much if there is anything to gain financially . Something to be aware of is that sometimes injuries , or the extent of them, only become apparent several hours/days/weeks after the initial trauma

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...