Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Hi GE MONEY/ Underwriter Cardif Pinnacle


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3122 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi can anyone help

We bought a kitchen, Company Living Design (Home Imp Ltd) who have ceased trading.

This was done through Finance and we were told NO PPI No Finance and that was it.

 

The loan was originally by First National who was taken over in 2003 by GE Money Lending, Insurance Policy Underwriter Cardiff Pinnacle.

 

I wrote to GE Money only to get back what seems one of there standard letters saying they neither sold the PPI OR was they present, they cannot investigate.

 

As they stated this was their final response.

The PPI was in my husbands name only and he was stilling paying up to the age of 71,

he received a letter stating he was no longer covered now he reached 65 and the the PPI ceased.

 

Any help would be more than appreciated.

Edited by Porshae33
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ge money never hold their hand up

 

I think there has been successes again Cardiff and first national

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ge money never hold their hand up

 

I think there has been successes again Cardiff and first national

 

Dx

 

Hii thank you for your reply. Do you know if I should contact Cardiff Pinnacle then. Any help appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

have a read around here using our search cag in the red top toolbar

hes a start

http://cse.google.co.uk/cse?cx=partner-pub-8889411648654839:6449422593&ie=UTF-8&q=Cardiff+Pinnacle+&sa=Search+CAG#gsc.tab=0&gsc.q=Cardiff%20Pinnacle&gsc.page=1

 

 

shout if you need help

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi thank you for your reply, I had a look at the thread you suggested but I am at a loss now wether I should write to Cardiff Pinnacle the same letter I sent to GE MONEY.

Any help would be welcome.

Link to post
Share on other sites

wont hurt

 

 

id be sending an fos customer questionnaire too mind

not simply a speculative letter of claim

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi thanks for reply.

 

 

When I was discussing this PPI with my husband he explained to me that I had got some facts wrong.

 

 

When the salesman from the Kitchen Company applied for Finnance while he was at the flat, apparently we got turned down.

So we thought that was the end of it.

 

 

About a week later the offer of Finnance came in the Post from First Direct now GE Money.

The Underwriters were Cardiff Pinnacle.

 

 

We did not no where thye got the information from regarding us wanting Finance.

The Finnance was in my husbands name only and he was just asked to sign the form, and return the Finnance Agreement,

the box on the agreement for PPI was already ticked.

 

I hope this makes some sense.

 

Could you tell me what a fos customer questionnaire is please.

 

Thank you for your help

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes that sounds quite typical.

 

 

here the questionnaire you use

 

 

http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/technical_notes/ppi.html

 

 

I'd simply put down exactly what you have above.

 

 

the paperwork was already ticked for PPI

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

nothing to do with the fos

just using the ind std questionnaire issued by them

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi sorry for all my confusion in this case,

 

 

I am trying to get my head round all this and what I do next

 

 

I think is write back to GE Money stating the new facts.

 

 

GE Money did state in their letter if anything different to write again if not the case was closed.

 

I will write again to them.

 

Thanks again for your help

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...