Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This is the dilemma I had then and still have it. The bit that stopped me was the post 2015 comments about them being enforceable now in most instances which I feel hasn’t been answered unless I am missing something. the bonus I guess is not all credit agreements now will be chasing me so less people chasing me down so to speak. this is the problem as there is conflicting messaging out there it is hard to plan a strategic way forward 
    • In 2017 my wife was given PIP and I finally, officially, became her carer. In 2019 she was reviewed and we were told it would be done by phone to make it easier for her as she has mobility issues and anxiety. The review was very simple, Has anything changed? No, ok, we'll stay as you are then. In 2022 a second review, this time by phone again but with an awkward given at the end for 5 years. Today, we got a new review letter (I know wait lists are bad, but I dont think the wait will take til 2027 for a decision). We're a bit confused because it's a letter, not a phone call as before. The form is just questions that ask "has anything changed" Now, since 2017, nothing has changed except we had our home adapted via disability grant. This was noted in the phone calls. So we should really write that nothing has changed in the last 2 years. The adaptations have been mentioned in both previous phone reviews, but not in writing so I guess we should bring it up. But we feel that they want us to explain everything as if it were a new claim again... And are worried if we miss something in the original claim or the phone calls she will risk losing part of the award (a 2 point swing could be really bad) It does just say "has anything changed?" But in dealing with ESA prior to getting PIP, answering the question asked "has your condition worsened or improved" at a review process with a simple "no, I'm still the same" somehow led to ESA ending and needing appeal. So just want a bit of guidance. How much detail is needed? Is minimal ok? Or should we be blunt with the fact nothing has changed, and bullet point the things she struggles with in each section?   I know the obvious thing is to just explain it all,but over 10 years the sheer amount of times the poor woman has had ESA or PIP stopped/refused just because something was missed out in their report, or they felt it meant a new claim should be made, or that they judged her healthy because we missed a tiny thing in our forms. During COVID it finally seemed like it was all just going to be smooth, especially with the phone reviews and the 5 year reward, but here we are. We just want to make sure we have the least chance to trip ourselves up, but making sure we have what is expected if you get me? I wish I still had a copy of the forms from 2017, because I could just verbatim copy them and add in about the adaptation, but (ironically) we lost our photocopies we kept of them when the house was being adapted
    • might of been better to have got them all defaulted 2yrs ago as we carefully explained before then you'd already be 1/3rd there and your current issue would not be one.    
    • No doubt the hotel will have security cameras on the floor you were staying to confirm or deny the allegation??   The only compensation you will probably get, which will be discretionary as a goodwill gesture, will be a credit voucher for the entire hotel group. Very much doubt anything more than that as you have not substantiated, the hotel committed the transgression 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Something i always wonder....


employee
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6596 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Aw shucks. I'm embarrased now! It was spoken from the heart.

Don't be embarrassed, it was truly a masterpiece. If half my letters were written in that style I would have the banks licking my shoes clean by now...

Alecto, Magaera et Tisiphone: Nemesis on Earth is come.

 

All advice and opinions given by Spiceskull are personal, and are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To date, I have had requests from 2 bank employees for permission to read/post in the forum - both of which are not this chap, nor the other one who was posting in the 'everything else' forum (the one who actually did say "if you didn't read the T&C's then it's your fault.").

 

3, actually, I got 1 the other day (your pm box was full apparently, they must have caught you on a bad day :D ).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mind you I haven't checked how clean my shoes are yet!

Perhaps, but you haven't seen some of the letters I have written...however, your chase will not be fruitless - you will get your money back one day soon...

Alecto, Magaera et Tisiphone: Nemesis on Earth is come.

 

All advice and opinions given by Spiceskull are personal, and are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My bl**dy PM box is FULL AGAIN!!!!???!! I cleaned it down yesterday (at your request BW ) and the a couple of days before that.

 

Who was the third?

If you feel that we have helped you, or you would like to help keep this web site running so that others can continue to get their money back, please click the donate button at the top of the forum.

Advice & opinions of Dave, The Bank Action Group and The Consumer Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

------------

 

 

Add me as your friend on FaceBook - I need all the friends I can get :-(

 

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=577405151

 

------------

Link to post
Share on other sites

the third???

Alecto, Magaera et Tisiphone: Nemesis on Earth is come.

 

All advice and opinions given by Spiceskull are personal, and are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3, actually, I got 1 the other day (your pm box was full apparently, they must have caught you on a bad day :D ).

 

No. 3 - bank employees that actually have read the rules.

If you feel that we have helped you, or you would like to help keep this web site running so that others can continue to get their money back, please click the donate button at the top of the forum.

Advice & opinions of Dave, The Bank Action Group and The Consumer Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

------------

 

 

Add me as your friend on FaceBook - I need all the friends I can get :-(

 

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=577405151

 

------------

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right - get you now.

Alecto, Magaera et Tisiphone: Nemesis on Earth is come.

 

All advice and opinions given by Spiceskull are personal, and are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My bl**dy PM box is FULL AGAIN!!!!???!! I cleaned it down yesterday (at your request BW ) and the a couple of days before that.

 

Who was the third?

 

WAS full, Dave, WAS full, this was on the 14th. I'll send you his/her pm. Mazz1983 is the name.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I give up with my PM box.

 

Email it to me if you can.

If you feel that we have helped you, or you would like to help keep this web site running so that others can continue to get their money back, please click the donate button at the top of the forum.

Advice & opinions of Dave, The Bank Action Group and The Consumer Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

------------

 

 

Add me as your friend on FaceBook - I need all the friends I can get :-(

 

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=577405151

 

------------

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dave....i just tried to send u a PM apologising, and asking if i can be number 4? :) But got told it was full also :p

 

And as the saying goes, when you've had a bad experience with a company/service ect that is the one that you are going to tell people about. And i admit, at times i hear collegues on the phone being rude or just plain not interested and i wonder how they keep their jobs.

But not EVERY employee is like this, a lot of us do go the extra mile to help people.

and just for the record, i am not sticking up for the company! but there are ppl there that will try the best they can to help!

and unfortunately when u work for a company that has over 1700 employees, one small voice isnt going to get heard, or even 20 of u together

but i know i do the best i can everyday (even when im getting sworn down the phone) :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having dealt with the Nationwide for the last 20 years or so I must say that other than the company stealing money from me on a regular basis I have always been treated with respect by all of the staff I have come into contact with. They may not have done what I wished them to do but we always discussed the situation reasonably. I would imagine that to have to listen to irate customers daily must be soul destroying especially when some of them came be rude and obnoxious. Perhaps I have been luckier than some of the other members of the forum but I can only tell it how it is.

Brian

Claim against Nationwide

6 years charges £1973

prelim letter 10 April

Charges refunded 15 April

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps I have been luckier than some of the other members of the forum

 

Ah coffindodger - you must just have the gift of the gab. After all you did pursuade one bank to pay up with just one letter and within the week. You underestimate the effect you have on people!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by employee

 

i understand your points entirely....

 

The reason i asked the question is not aiming at anyone whos ever recieved a charge on a a/c.... i should explain my posistion more clearly

 

My posistion is a debt collector on current a/c's (what a joyful career :D )

And every day i see accounts where for 18 months direct debits have been bouncing, there is a large amount of charges, which have given the a/c an overdrawn balance, but no contact has ever been recieved from the customer, and that is when i wonder how people could let the matter get that far

 

Why don't the banks/bs's contact the customer when they are concerned about the 'conduct of the account' (as Nationwide like to refer to it when refusing any type of assistance)? My friend banks with RBS and they are always phoning her when she goes into the red. It serves as a warning to her and yes, whilst it might be a ploy to offer her a loan at least it could be said they are taking an active interest and offering her some solutions. No, Nationwide they just sit back and watch you get into difficulty, refuse to help when you beg and plunge you further into despair with their despicable charges.

 

Phew Employee, reading some of the posts in this thread has been an eye opener. You've got a real lively debate going on here!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by employee

Checking statements has everything to do with it, because thats where your charges are notified.............

 

Checking statements has nothing to do with it! I check mine every month without fail.But tell me, how are you supposed to know, that one of your direct debits will be taken out earlier than it should, or your tax credit payment paid in late,or a cheque payment to you, will bounce? All things that have happened to me, which will then send your whole financial plan out of the window!And if you are on a low income, and trying to support 2 young children, pay a mortgage, pay creditors, and keep the baillifs from the door, where are you expected to find these bank charges? They are mercilessly taken from your account, without any thought for the harm they will cause.

Cleopatra

Link to post
Share on other sites

The point is that charges are unlawful. It doesn't matter how much employee or any other bank staff try to put a moral spin on the matter. It is still unlawful.

 

Checking statements, being more careful, applying moral responsibility doesn't get away from the law. It is sad that even the staff are not interested to listen.

 

My Dad always said 'two wrongs don't make a right'. It remains true even in this situation.

 

Employee however seems incapable of addressing the whole issue and is now just repeating the party line. Perhaps we should just ignore them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thought it might be worth putting my point of view.

 

We all have strengths and weakneses, using our strengths to make a living, and handing over other matters to the experts who should solve problems quickly and efficiently.

 

I have, in the last fifty years, had a few bank managers who were absolutely first class (and are now retired). Just a short visit and chat was all that was needed so solve a problem. Usually instant, too. Expert, experienced people who knew their job

and did it well.

 

Some people are lucky enough to have stable and sufficient income to be able to take time to spend some hours a week checking everything. Others amongst us are working our butts off doing a job and getting the money in. When the going gets tough it is to be expected that the paid professionals do their job too. As far as the Banks, especially the Building Societies, are concerned, their job is to profit from investments, and to protect their customers. (Fiduciary is the word, I think.)

Not to rob them when they are not looking.

 

I do not want to be a top notch banker any more than I want to be a surgeon, a dentist, an airline pilot or a plumber.

 

But it seems more and more that, to survive, one needs to become expert in everything now.

 

It is not sufficient to shelter behind a few stock phrases to avoid doing a job well.

 

Just a few years ago I had cause to visit an aged relative in hospital. He was slowly going blind and deaf, and had developed both eye and ear infections which did not help. I found that they were also starving him. The reason was that he didnt speak to the nurses or appear to see them, so, if he didnt ask, he didnt get.

 

Having explained some basics, like writing on big sheets of paper using big letters

in marker pen, and speaking loudly and clearly into his good ear, some sort of communication was established.

 

So he died of mrsa instead.

 

This site is doing a superb job which should result in focussing the attention of the Banks on their real role.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i suppose i can :p

 

and if the 'putting a moral spin' comment was aimed at me too.... look through every post i have made, and nowhere have i said that bank charges are moral or something banks/buliding societies should do. i 100% disagree with nearly all the charges are made to ppl, the only time when i will agree with them is when someone is purposely abusing their a/c (like garantueeing cheques got £100 each day at cash convertors which i see so much :p )

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6596 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...