Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Swift advances , i stopped repo, but now need help with BK hearing


april dew
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2915 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

have unapproved attachments due to address showing

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 138
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

was the loan in your name or joint names?

 

Is the house in your name or joint names?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

there are so many issues, and taking into account that swift already have a suspended repo order, the arrears and time remaining on your first mortgage,

and the bankruptcy, you really need some form of legal representation in order to try to gain more time to get all the facts together,

as you clearly have valid disputes with swift

 

dont worry over the attachments, removed for your protection

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if I re-present myself would I be able to ask for more time.

I wrote a complaint to hand to the judge saying I have been awaiting proof of claim of debt, the actual accounting but I have been ignored, and I am in the process of finding out if I have been mis-sold this loan

and I would offer remedy to any claim that is fair and true.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I went to the hearing today concerning swift trying to repossess my home.

 

the judge said he would not grant a order of sale today

because they did not have a proper valuation of my house ,

the valuation they have was printed of the internet.

 

the judge said they have to arrange a proper valuation,

and if I don't comply with this they would sell my house with the valuation they have at the moment.

application adjourned for 28 days.

 

Trustee also made me another appointment to come and see them with information about my assets which I have none nothing but my house.

there isn't anything I have that's valuable to them that can be sold.

 

The trustee said there is still a warrant on me because of the contempt of court situation,

so I must attend that meeting with them.

otherwise the warrant will be executed.

 

I need to do some serious work

 

 

I hope I receive the SARs soon so I can plan my next move.

Edited by april dew
need to ad other info
Link to post
Share on other sites

I've sorted the attachment.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would seriously suggest that you now seek urgent legal advice, due to the many complex issues

 

As soon as the sar arrives,post it up and we can help with advice as regards the disputes re swift

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

they have 40days

doesn't mean it will take that long mind

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

can I ask a question.

 

If my repayments with Swift is a CAPITAL and INTEREST REPAYMENTS, should not my loan be paid of at the end of term.

 

I was jus wondering why most people including myself will have almost the same amount to pay at the end of payment term as at the beginning.

 

even though you might be in arrears how does the final amount ad up.

just a query.

 

 

sorry the attachment below is the letter I received from Swift concerning the unfair charges.

Edited by april dew
for got to add letter
Link to post
Share on other sites

admin fees

arrears charge

letter sent

request for info

management charge

sent demand for payment

issue fee

request official copies

sols agents fee

cancelled repo fee

 

 

for a start.

 

 

and you need to check EVERY litigation fee

if they were not witin the time frame of an ACTIVE court claim

get those back too

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

masses of management charges, lets see the agreement please

 

Have you approached anyone for legal representation yet?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can we also see the terms and conditions of the agreement please

 

We need to see how clearly their charges were set out in the agreement

 

Was the PPI repaid directly to yourself?

 

In view of the complexity surrounding the bankruptcy issues, I would strongly advise once again that you obtain legal

represtation prior to your next hearing

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you certainly have grounds for complaint against swift, going back to the OFT findings from june2011-----

 

An OFT investigation found Swift was giving secured loans to customers with poor credit histories or limited access to credit without:

 

- checking whether they could afford the loan

 

- verifying their income

 

- taking account of their other financial commitments and personal circumstances

 

- fully checking the information provided in the application.

 

Secured lending is considered to be high risk by the OFT because borrowers are at risk of losing their home if they default on a loan.

 

The OFT also uncovered evidence in some cases that Swift failed to fully explain the charges that could be incurred if customers fell into arrears and failed to exhaust alternative options before taking borrowers to court.

 

As a result, the OFT has imposed a set of requirements on Swift, which ensures it must:

 

- carry out proper assessments of a borrower's ability to repay the loan without undue hardship

 

- only take steps to repossess a borrower's home as a last resort

 

- be transparent about their charges and when they apply.

 

David Fisher, OFT Director of consumer creditlink3.gif, said:

 

"Credit businesses must lend responsibly - failure to do so can have a very serious impact on borrowers. We require Swift to significantly improve the way it carries out its business. If they fail to comply with these requirements, they will face further enforcement action."

 

 

-----the agreement that you signed could not be less transparent about their charges and when they apply, in fact the amounts to be charged and when they apply

 

are not shown, to charge £250 as a default fee and £64plus as monthly management charges are totally untenable.

 

The problem you have as regards the fos, is that yours was an unregulated agreement

 

you really need urgently a solicitor before your next hearing, as far as swift goes there are real causes for complaint and redress

 

you may also wish to talk through your concerns with the FCA,

 

Consumers (and people representing consumers)

 

If you have a query about a service or product:

Call us on 0800 111 6768 (freephone) or 0300 500 8082 from the UK, or +44 207 066 1000 from abroad. We are open Monday to Friday, 8am-6pm, and Saturday 9am-1pm.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...