Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks, dx. Yes, I may need to turn my attention into some other things.
    • no they wont  can you PLEASE stop panicking about a nothing burger   dx  
    • Where a person who owns or partially owns a property enters into an IVA, it's usual practice that in the fifth year, the person has to attempt to re-mortgage the property to release equity. It's extremely rare that a homeowner will be successful in re-mortgaging due to having a poor credit rating. Where the owner is unable to re-mortgage, the IVA is extended for a further year. This is absolutely normal practice in an IVA, and if your sister cancels payments to the IVA, the IVA is at risk of failing and she could be made bankrupt, therefore losing any equity she has in the property. 
    • Right. So I think it would be  good idea to give a brief description of the property, for example detached house, or flat or terraced. And some sort of identifier so we can distinguish from other properties you handle. An incomplete street address eg "No.14" would do so while preserving your privacy. Is the freehold title discrete for the property, or does it cover other leasehold properties? And a bit about your history, how current ownership came about. At one stage you said it used to be your family home, elsewhere you wrote that you'd bought the leasehold. Did those comments refer to this property? Did you acquire it on the open market, or from your family? Is this the house with the garages, where you own the freehold? Trying to understand whether there are underlying reasons that might account for problems with valuation, eligibility for finance, and the fact that neither you nor Lender found it possible to sell. Finally (for the moment) you refer to existing litigation. Does that relate to this property? If so it would be good to give a brief overview. Civil or criminal? What role do play .. claimant, defendant, appellant, respondent?  Charge, or cause of action. You don't want to go off on separate path that would better joined to the current proceedings. 
    • Can you confirm the client on the letter please? Is it The Original Energy Provider or PRAC Energy? 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Unpaid holiday payb


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3186 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

I quit my job at the beginning of the month and have just received my holiday pay and they only paid me for 6.5 days when it should have been 2 weeks

 

I am writing a letter but I'm not very good and was just wondering if you could have a read and let me know what you think

 

To who it concerns

 

I have today recived my payslip and have only been paid for 6.5 days holiday when it should be 14 days

 

As you know when I got tuped over to your company I informed you my old company's holidays ran from 1st jan to 31st dec not April to march and you said not to worry as it would get sorted out after the first year

 

Due to this I believe I am owed approximately £539.40p which is 7.5 days wages

Please either pay this into my bank or by cheque within 14 days or please let me know if you do not believe this is true and can you give me the reasons why you believe this money is not owed to me

 

Regards

Mmf hater

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

 

I quit my job at the beginning of the month and have just received my holiday pay and they only paid me for 6.5 days when it should have been 2 weeks

 

I am writing a letter but I'm not very good and was just wondering if you could have a read and let me know what you think

 

Dear Sir or Madam

 

I have today recived my payslip after ceasing employment with [NAME] and appear to have only been paid for 6.5 days accrued holiday pay when by my calculations this should have been it should be 14 days owed

 

As you know when I was transferred over to your company under TUPE I informed you that my old company's holidays ran from 1st jan to 31st dec not April to March. You assured me that this would be sorted out after the first year and I would not be disadvantaged

 

Due to this I believe I am owed approximately £539.40p which is 7.5 days wages

Please either pay this into my bank or by cheque within 14 days or please let me know if you do not believe this is true and can you give me the reasons why you believe this money is not owed to me

 

Regards

Mmf hater

 

The letter looks fine by me but I have just amended the bits in red to aid clarity.

 

I would say that you need to just double check your figures - you say that you are owed 2 weeks holiday then also state that this is 14 days? a normal working week would be 5 days surely, so the outstanding holiday should have been 10 days? They have paid you 6.5 so that would leave 3.5 days owing?

 

Give them the 14 days as a polite request then if needed a 7 day Letter Before Claim as a follow up if needed.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for helping

 

I went on to the gov holiday entitlement calculator website and that worked out the holiday due

 

I'm also going to give my reasons I resigned as acas said to do that to start the grievance process as what has happened they believe is classed as breach if contract and constructive dismissal

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Quick update

They have agreed I am owed 14 days holiday so will be paying me that money

I also put in a grievence that as I was tuped over my original contract was 45 hours then I got told I had to be on call for 60 hours a week yet everyone else at my depot were working 48 hours

Acas said that is breach of contract and as I walked I can also claim constructive dismissal so I have billed them 5k for over time and they are looking into this

as you have to log on and off and all milage ect is recorded they will see this on there computor system

Link to post
Share on other sites

You cannot put in a grievance if you are no longer an employee of the company

 

Forget constructive dismissal, it may well be a breach of contract but you address that by the Grievance procedure. A sort of Pr-action protocol

 

Not to mention was this on call 60 hours a week written into your contract of employment?? If not you are blowing in the wind as it is only your word against theirs if told orally

Link to post
Share on other sites

My original contract with the old company was verbal and I worked from home and I also have pay slips to prove any time I worked over 45 hours a week was double time

 

With the 60 hours I received a letter giving me 2 days notice then when I refused I then got another letter giving me 11 weeks notice or face disciplinary action (11 1/2 years service)

Everyone else got the letter but the area manager let them carry on working 4on 3 off but would not let me do that as it would leave my area under staffed as they sacked 2 of the 4 people that tuped over as they had only been there between a year and 18 months And they did not replace them

Link to post
Share on other sites

Everyone has a contract of employment, that can be verbal as to implied terms though a written contract has to be given within 60 days or employee hand book

 

What makes it different in your case will be custom and practice

 

You were TUPED over so you will now be under the new company contract of employment with respecting your previous terms of the old company.

 

It still does not alter a thing, you walked out without submitting a grievance and that is a breach of contract. The new employer can now technically sue you for the cost of a temp until your position is filled

Link to post
Share on other sites

I first asked how much notice I had to give and got told 3 months yet acas said I only had to give a month max so I worked the month then quit on the spot

They didn't advertise until someone else left and they are also letting the fella I worked with at the old company work 36 hours a week when he also is meant to be working 60 hours

They also can't realy get a temp as you have to be trained on the cash handling and repaires

Link to post
Share on other sites

The norm is a months notice if monthly paid but your contract of employment can state a three month notice period is required before termination of the contract as an express term

 

You cannot be forced to work more than 48 hours a week unless you have voluntary signed the "Opt out" of the working time Directive

Link to post
Share on other sites

There argument was on call is not working time And you could do what you wanted BUT you had to be available to take the call when they rang

 

My old company it was on call from home 45 hours per week any time over 8 hours was paid double time

 

According to acas I was still on my old verbal contract which I argued with Comp2 about but as far as they were concerned I was on there contract even thou all I had signed for was that I had recived the company handbook and a lot of stuff In it referred to the statment of particulars which I had never seen or recived

 

When I asked my manager about notice period he said he contacted the md who stated I had to give 3 months and everyone who I spoke to were surprised at that amount of notice that's why I walked after 1 month along with the other reasons

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update

 

Got a cheque for the outstanding holiday pay but they have taken tax and ni out even thou they have sent me my p45 a month ago

Can they do that ??

 

Also they sent me a letter saying no to my overtime claim they are saying only when traveling to or from sites and time spent on site is working time yet my original contract was work from home on call for 8 hours per day

Link to post
Share on other sites

The way that they have paid you is absolutely correct and any overpaid tax will come back to you when the record catches up at your new employer - although you could go to them with whatever form of payslip you have received and ask whether they need a copy.

 

I agree with previous statements that you will have a very difficult time arguing that a verbal agreement made with your old employer still holds true - you will need to evidence previous grievances which raised the problem with your employer back to the time of transfer and evidence that such an agreement was in place previously - clearly itemised payslips might help?

 

Probably needs professional advise

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have itemised payslips probably dating back 5or 6 years and they show overtime and the extra £125 a week holiday pay we use to get

 

My main grievance is that Me and the others that got tuped over had to be on call 60 hours a week yet all the others in the local depot were doing 48 hours when we all got the letter stating 60 hours

 

It feels like they wanted to buy the company but not keep us lot on as within 2 months they had got rid of 2 people

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...