Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
    • hi all just got the reminder letter, I have attached it and also the 2nd side of the original 1st pcn (i just saw the edit above) Look forward to your advice Thanks   PCN final reminder.pdf pcn original side 2.pdf
    • The airline said it was offering to pay $10,000 to those who sustained minor injuries.View the full article
    • The Senate Finance Committee wants answers from BMW over its use of banned Chinese components by 21 June.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Here Goes


owdoo
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6239 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

ok, then here's a template - tweak it to your taste.Rejection of settlement offer

no law says you have to file right away - in fact - some people in your place have held off filing and have found that the bank actually comes through (not many), so, hold off filing until you have the money and send the letter and who knows.... you may get lucky and get a full offer,

if not and you get the money to file, then you can.

good luck - let us know what happens.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Lateralus

 

I have tweaked the letter as i am now claiming for mre than origionally stated along with the calculated interest is this ok to do so or are we only aloud to claim interest once we get the MCOL stage, please advise.

 

xxxxxx

xx

xx

xxxxx

08/01/2007

HSBC

Service Quality Team

xxxxxx

xxxx

xxx

xxxxxxxx

Ref: CIN: xxxxxxxxxx

Account number xxxxxxxSort Code xxxxxxxx

 

Response to settlement offer.

 

Dear Mr. xxxxxx

 

Thank you for your letter dated 02/01/07

I respectfully decline your offer of settlement and request, once again, that you return to me all charges imposed on this account, totaling £1665.40.

 

Furthermore after more investigation into recent statements the charges have now risen to £1853.82 levied by the Bank in the way of charges. The charges are a disproportionate penalty and therefore unenforceable as they are contrary to common law.

I also intend to claim interest under s.69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year from 24/09/01 to 24/11/06 of £190.71 and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of £0.37

Therefore the final amount due is £2,044.53

I will accept the sum offered only as part settlement and on the clear understanding that I will pursue recovery of the remainder, with a County Court claim if necessary.

 

I require repayment in full of this money; if you do not comply fully within 14 days then I shall begin a claim against you for the full amount plus my costs and without further notice.

 

I trust this clarifies my position.

 

 

Yours faithfully

 

 

 

Name

Link to post
Share on other sites

I respectfully decline your offer of settlement and request, once again, that you return to me all charges imposed on this account, totaling £1665.40.(Delete this old figure, since you are now claiming more, it just confuses the issue)

 

Furthermore after more investigation into my recent bank statements the charges have now risen to £1853.82 levied by the Bank in the way of charges. The charges are a disproportionate penalty and therefore unenforceable as they are contrary to common law. I enclose an amended schedule of charges to reflect these additinal charges

 

I also intend to claim interest under s.69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year from 24/09/01 to 24/11/06 of £190.71 and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of £0.37 (Delete this para. You can't cllaim this until you file at court)

 

Therefore the final amount due is £1853.82

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers lads I am sending out the following.

 

Dear Mr. Langdale

 

Thank you for your letter dated 02/01/07

I respectfully decline your offer of settlement and request, once again, that you return to me all charges imposed on this account.

 

Furthermore after more investigation into my recent bank statements the charges have now risen to £1853.82 levied by the Bank in the way of charges. The charges are a disproportionate penalty and therefore unenforceable as they are contrary to common law. I enclose an amended schedule of charges to reflect these additional charges

Therefore the final amount due is £1853.82

 

I will accept the sum offered only as part settlement and on the clear understanding that I will pursue recovery of the remainder, with a County Court claim if necessary.

 

I require repayment in full of this money; if you do not comply fully within 14 days then I shall begin a claim against you for the full amount plus my costs and without further notice.

 

I trust this clarifies my position.

 

 

Yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok got the followinf back from the bank this morning......

 

Dear Mr xxxx

REF: xxxxxxx x x x xxx

 

Thank you for your letter dated 8th january

 

I can confirm that the bans position has been clearly stated in our letter dated 2nd january 2007. This lette constitutes our final response with regard to this matter and advised that should you remain unsatisfied, you have the option to refer to the financial Ombudsman Service as detailed in the leaflet provided.

 

Your sincerely

 

 

starting to worry a bit should I have accepted the offer? do I now proceed to court?

:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that Hannah, Feel a little better!

 

 

Right I am about to start MCOL I have filled in all the details and am due to process does anyone have any idea how long it takes fom this point?

:rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

it varies, when i claimed against HSBC they paid me within 2 weeks, but that was august last year.

 

From reading the other threads they seem too acknowledge, then file a defence then wait right up until a few days before the allocation question needs to be handed in by.

 

So realistically you could be looking at 6-8 weeks to have the cash in your pocket. If you prepare yourself for a wait this long at least if they do pay out sooner it will be a bonus.

 

I think the main reason they are taking longer to pay out now is because they are getting alot more claims now also.

 

When it does get acknowledged their will be a name of the contact at DG solicitors. I would either Fax or post you charges scheldule to that person directly at that point as it may speed things along.

 

Good Luck;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Aaaagh I am going throug MCOL and have replied wth the following but it is apparently more than 24 lines over what I am allowed what can I take out to shorten it?

 

The Claimant had a contract with the

Defendant 2xxxxxxx from September 2001

which was conducted on their standard

terms and conditions. The Claimant claims

the return of £1853.82 levied by the

defendant in the way of charges. The

charges are a disproportionate penalty and

therefore unenforceable as they are

contrary to common law. Further, as a

disproportionate penalty they are invalid

under the Unfair (Contracts) Terms Act

1977s.4 and under the Unfair Terms in

Consumer Contracts Regs 1999, Para 8 and

sch.2(1)(e). In the event that the charges

are not a penalty, they are unreasonable

within the meaning of the Supply of Goods

and Services Act 1982 s.15. The defendant

has been asked to justify the charges but

they have declined to do so. The Claimant

claims interest under s.69 of the County

Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year

from 24/09/01 to 24/11/06 of £190.71 and

also interest at the same rate up to the

date of judgement or earlier payment at a

daily rate of £0.37

 

:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Ok got a letter back from the courts acknowloging my claim all fine.

 

Got one back yesterday "A NOTICE THAT ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERICE HAS BEEN FILED"

 

A tick in the box stating that they intend to defend all of this claim!!!

 

How can they defend? Is this normal? I am starting to worry!!!:o

Link to post
Share on other sites

perfectly normal. you'll receive your notice of ackn. in the post in a couple of days. on page 2 will be dg solicitor who's dealing with your case. send a breakdown of charges to dg and 2/3 to northampton court, then ring dg in a few days to make sure they have received it.

 

meanwhile, read as many threads as you can ok

If i've been helpful in any way....then tip my scales over there!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Ok by my calculations HSBC have untill Thursday to supply the defence through MCOL. They have akowledged the claim and are defending it but no sign of anything yet, what happens after thursday?

 

Should I contact the solicitor? or just wait or enter judgment online?

Link to post
Share on other sites

AFter re looking at my sums it is now 30 days and nothing? After looking on my claim through MCOL it states that the HSBC intend to defend the full amount owed!! I am a bit at a loss do i just wait now? and for how long? ANy advice is greatly appreciated!

Link to post
Share on other sites

have you tried the judgement button on line yet. it may you push it but no doubt the courts will give hsbc extra time to submit their defense. at this stage i would ring the courts and find out what's happening with your claim. don't worry too much, i think they are absolutely bogged down with claims at the mo, which can only be to your advantage should they not submit their defence.

If i've been helpful in any way....then tip my scales over there!

Link to post
Share on other sites

aaaagh !! his was on my mcol form You are unable to take any further action online on this claim.

 

The Defendant disputes the whole amount you have claimed. Your claim cannot proceed online and will be transferred to the appropriate court for continuation. You will receive confirmation to where the claim has been transferred to shortly.

 

does this mean they have submitted defence? should I be worried?

Link to post
Share on other sites

:Cry: Ok serious stuff now, got the pack through from the court and filled in the questionnaire along with another £100 in court fees!!!!! (Really need for this to work or I am going to be mega skint!)

Also got a from DG solicitors requesting the breakdown of charges of which I have also just sent!!

Does everyone get to this stage!?? I know I keep asking and sound impatient but any idea how long it takes from this point? Depending on if I win!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...