Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • It is essential that you find out where the car is.  It is also essential to find out whether what you signed was an authorisation What precisely it was that you authorised.  I expect it was an authorisation and it certainly is going to be a big problem that you didn't read what you signed.  However you must find out and you must do it as quickly as possible.  If necessary start telephoning people but read our customer services guide first.  But then render everything in writing  
    • There are 19 documents received from SARS request, spread out over 2 messages too big to put all on one. I have also received the Notification of allocation to the small claims track hearing for beginning nov 2024 SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-11.pdf SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-12.pdf SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-13.pdf SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-14.pdf SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-15.pdf SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-16.pdf
    • 050124 DcbLegal-1_1.pdf 050124 DcbLegal-2_1.pdf 121223 DCbLegal_1.pdf SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-1.pdf SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-2.pdf SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-3.pdf SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-4.pdf SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-5.pdf SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-6.pdf SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-7.pdf SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-8.pdf SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-9.pdf SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-10.pdf
    • From the Law Gazette. Paula Vennells had faith in her lawyers - and threw them under the bus. Post Office Inquiry: Paula Vennells trusted her lawyers and then threw them under the bus | Law Gazette WWW.LAWGAZETTE.CO.UK If we are to believe the former chief executive, she was simply too trusting of her general counsel.  
    • Thank you dx. Not very nice reading, but I have learnt a bit, I will need to go over some of them again later.  Something I picked up from those posts are Auxillis use of tick boxes and electronic signatures.   I need to find out what the tow truck driver made me sign for.  He put the car on the trailer and locked it down, then got a phone in a big protective case out and just handed it to me. I didn't even think what I was signing, I presumed it was related to the condition of the car on retrieval from the ditch and their collection and assumption of responsibility for the insurance company.    unclebulgaria67, I struggle to easily write concise, to the point posts.  I thought that my initial post was already too long and wordy so tried to keep it brief and to the point. I didn't write every moment of the accident the way I told the police or insurers because most of it would be a waste of your time as my innocence is not my concern. The other party fled the scene.  My immediate concern is my car being taken without consent, stored where it will accrue charges, get treated in any manner of ways because they assume its getting written off and dont need to look after it and then possibly taken to a car auction site where I will have to pay additional fees to get it back if it is declared a write off. I am also in increasing amounts of pain in my lower back and neck and ever increasing sense of injustice and foreboding.    I do not see how my original post could go 50/50 personally, but I am reading my words with the images I have in my head, so have taken your warning on board and will make sure I don't mess up on any other documents.    So as far as I know someone from Vizion who have been hired by Auxillis is going to assess my vehicle at some point in the future.  The form I filled in for Vizion said that an approved assessor would attend my house to assess if the car is worthy of being repaired.  My car is not at my house, why the discrepancy? I agree that it is likely that they are not going to want to repair my car, I think it is worth it, I know what I have done to keep it sound, but market value and the astronomical cost of repairs...  Which is why I am worried that my car has been pulled in to a scam against my consent. How much is it going to cost me to get it back when it could be sitting on my drive.  It is just being used to charge someone storage, then will go to copart and they will charge someone storage, then they will charge me a release fee and I will have to find a way to get it back to my house which will cost more money.  All when I repeatedly requested that the car be taken off the truck when it was outside my house.    I have advised Auxillis that I repeatedly requested my car be taken off the tow truck outside my house and was not listened to.  I stated that I was left feeling that my car had been taken without my consent and was not provided a valid reason for them keeping the car.  I want to know where my car is, why it is there and would like it brought back to my house to await their assessor who already thinks the car is at my house.  Sorry bankfodder i forgot to ask who authorised it, but i will ask. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Overseas Role with UK Company. No Annual leave. Is this contract legal?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3370 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi There,

 

I recently accepted a role for a large travel company working abroad (in Turkey). Staff are put on temporary short-term contracts with wages to a UK bank account. My main concern is the contract and the right to annual leave. As far as I am aware, UK employment law still applies as it is a temporary contract based overseas.

 

In the contract, it says employees work 6 days a week and all employees must take half a days annual leave each week. As a result, all employees essentially work 5 and a half days a week. My question was whether or not this was legal, and if so, why don't all companies do this if they don't fancy paying staff annual leave? It all seems a bit underhand and I am wondering if it is worth challenging either before or after I finish work with the company.

 

I am also concerned about the contract including an opt-out for the 48 hour a week, considering the wage is a few hundred short of £1000 a month. However, accommodation is included. With this in mind, I assume minimum wage obligations are being met by the company? I work it out as £3.50 an hour (exc. free accommodation).

 

Here is a selection of text that I am concerned about. Any advice is much appreciated.

 

 

No Overtime

"Your salary will be paid by equal monthly instalments in arrears less any deductions required by law or agreed between you and the Company. No overtime payments will be made for additional hours worked."

 

Training Costs

"You are obliged to pay a fixed amount of £300 or consent to allowing the Company to offset this amount against your final salary, as a contribution towards trainings costs incurred if:

"The Company dismisses you for poor performance or unacceptable behaviour within your first assignment period.

 

Should your final salary not cover the full amount of the training costs incurred by the Company, the Company will endeavour to recover the outstanding amount from you."

 

Taking Annual Leave

You will generally be required to take 1⁄2 day annual leave per week during your period of employment. Prior to booking any additional annual leave, you should discuss and agree the dates with your Manager. If you do not use your holiday entitlement in the relevant holiday year, the entitlement will be forfeited except in exceptional circumstances where the Company agrees in advance to the carrying over of holiday. Payment in lieu of any annual leave will only be made when you leave the Company. (For the avoidance of doubt, you will not be entitled to any payment in lieu of the entitlement in any other circumstances).

 

 

 

 

Any thoughts or legal opinions shall be much appreciated.

 

:)

 

AnonLurker

Edited by anonlurker123
Link to post
Share on other sites

What does the contract say the employers registered office is?

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Registered in the United Kingdom.

 

Jurisdiction

Your contract shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with English Law. The parties hereby submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the English courts

 

 

In addition to the above, there is also the following I am concerned about.

 

Leaver fee

At commencement of each summer assignment with the Company, you will be financially bonded as security, against the event that your employment is terminated by reason of your resignation or dismissal prior to the end of the assignment. A payment of 25% of your first full months salary will be deducted against costs incurred in relation to administration and travel in this event.

 

So if you do not complete the full contract, they want to charge £300 for the training costs + 25% of the first months salary.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can well imagine it's the kind of job that peopel leave early as it's much harder work than it looks on the telly... and the reps can be young and overly drunk... and having got a cheap flight out and somewhere to stay in a nice warm place.... I can think of a dozen reasons to dismiss for gross misconduct without trying...I think it's all ok. but it is tough, badly paid hard work.Check the leave stuff here.https://www.gov.uk/holiday-entitlement-rights/entitlement

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply.

 

Its not a rep role as such. More office based.

 

I have looked at the holiday entitlement .gov webpage and I am remain uncertain as to whether or not the contract is legal. Can an employer require you to work 6 days a week, and force you to take half a days annual leave per week?

 

If so, the whole concept of holiday entitlement is not legally secure from an employee point of view. Or am I missing something?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Am employer can absolutely dictate when you take your holidays and because you are a seasonal worker different rules apply about rest breaks.You sound like you do not want to take the role.. there is no obligation to!

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am desperate for a job atm. So I don't have much in the name of leverage. Your assumption that I am under no obligation to take the role is therefore incorrect.

 

This is why we have employment rights, otherwise in the name of economic hardship, the most efficient capitalist organisations would make employees work 18 hours a day, 7 days a week. I'm sure workers in apple affiliated workshops in Asia are under 'no obligation' to take up their role, but the reality is different.

 

I am surprised that a company can essentially withdraw annual leave via a contractual loophole.

 

Any other opinions? :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

you're going to be overseas dependent on them for a roof over your head and cash

 

d you really think knowing the letter of the law and your rights is going to make a difference on the ground?

 

Go, or don't....

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have been offered a job with rubbish terms of employment as a fixed term contract. You can either walk away from it or accept it and go out there and feel aggrieved about it all afterwards.

Personally I wouldnt touch it with a bargepole but many people will do it and complain afterwards and that is why they dont have to change things. If no-one took up the position they would be stranded up a creek without a paddle and have to offer better terms.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...