Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The Letter of Claim information is not absolutely essential, but it would be useful for two reasons. Firstly, judges take a dim view of companies or individuals who rush to court without giving the other party notice and a chance to settle - the Letter of Claim.  If they didn't send it we could include this point in your defence and it would be detrimental to them. Secondly, we know Countrywide.  They are a very small cowboy company.  The are reluctant to do court, simply becasue they are very bad  at it.  Their record of beating Caggers in front of a judge is exactly 0%.  They have lost every time.  They send the Letter of Claim also to look for people who don't reply, thinking that the person might not reply to a claim form either, giving them an easy default win.  Conclusion - always best to reply to a Letter of Claim and ridicule the PPC's case.
    • Any update here? I ask as we have someone in a similar situation.
    • Thanks!  I already sent the acknowledgement as i panicked and thought today was the last day to respond.  Then i remembered this wonderful forum.  I'll follow the steps in the sticky next.
    • It's possible.  I suffer from ADHD and also anxiety and depression currently and struggle with paperwork.  I'll have a search around to see if i can find anything.  If they did send something I haven't replied.  I thought there's no way that they will pursue this because I know for a fact i didn't park in a private space and the evidence they have sent is so ridiculous.  What impact does this other paperwork have?
    • The particulars of claim doesn’t mention statement of accounts.  Should I include that in the cpr letter?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Brother and Problems paying Lloyds


Ftgab19
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3354 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all again,

 

Not to long ago I told my brother to request a payment holiday to Lloyds so he could save a bit of money to get back on track with his debts.

 

Lloyds have since asked for him to send a budget sheet before they can do anything.

 

What he owes:

 

Lloyds Loan:£873

Loan to father:£100

Current Account Overdraft: £110

 

He doesn't want anything on credit file so he is willing to pay what they say if that's the only way to keep them off is credit file. I will upload his budget sheet for everyone to see.

 

Could anyone advise what would be best for him to do.

 

Thanks

Andrew

We live in a world where seeing is not believing, where only a few know what really happened.

NatWest Problem *****Refunded*****

Link to post
Share on other sites

thing is with things on credit file, such arrangements may be recorded on file. which may affect credit worthiness. never know with them. but, sometimes with a short term reduced payment they wont adversely adjust cra files

what is the goal re having nothing on credit file?

whatever happens, communicate in writing. dont rely on what they say on the phone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The goal ford was to get him back on track and do as little as we can to the credit report. He will want to get a loan for a car in the next few months so he wants to leave the report alone and even pay what the say if it means Lloyds messing his report up.

 

Andrew

We live in a world where seeing is not believing, where only a few know what really happened.

NatWest Problem *****Refunded*****

Link to post
Share on other sites

as a 'clean' cra file seems most import. maybe then see if can get on one of those internal 'payment holiday' plans ksmith mentioned that dont adversely effect the cra file.

loyds used to do a temp reduced payment plan re a credit card that wasnt reported adversely, ie was reported as normal payments. dont know if they still do though. or whether it cld be combined with the o/d. may need to deal with the o/d separately.

check the ICO website re their guide re how things could be reported on a cra file.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks ford,

 

How would I apply for a internal payment holiday? I already sent Lloyds a standard payment holiday letter and they just sent my brother back a budget sheet. Should I just send them back the budget sheet I uploaded here?

 

Thanks

Andrew

We live in a world where seeing is not believing, where only a few know what really happened.

NatWest Problem *****Refunded*****

Link to post
Share on other sites

not sure.

that temp plan mentioned used to be poss over the phone re their (unreliable) indian collections centre. dont know if thats still poss.

cld try going in branch, speak to an account manager, get them to arrange and confirm it.

must get confirmation though that cra files wont be adversely effected, as thats what you want.

seems what you're looking for is a 'payment holiday'/temp reduced payments (which wld prob include some interest). either of which not affecting the credit file. they might need some income/expend info though, dont know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Brother and Problems paying Lloyds
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...