Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Masters Mitsubishi Mis Sold Mini


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3404 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My wife bought a Mini Cooper from Masters Mitsubishi in September 2014

- They sold it saying the car had run flat tyres -

 

She had an issue with a flat tyre and took it to a tyre specialist who told her they were normal tyres not run flats.

 

We contacted Masters and told them that they have not provided the tyres as detailed in the sales pitch

- The managers said nothing he could do now and said the sales agent does not remember saying they had run flats

and that there was nothing he would do for us.

 

As far as I am concerned this breaches SOGA / Trading Standards - please correct me where applicable.

 

I find it very frustrating to be fobbed off like they don't care which they obviously do not.

 

What course of action would you say that I now pursue?

 

Thanks Justin

Link to post
Share on other sites

prove your claim

 

 

verbal is very difficult to prove.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you get a spare or puncture kit with the car?

 

If you got neither then if suggests they should have been run flats and it may add to your argument.

 

I'm slightly confused by your flat tyre thought, run flats visually don't go flat, even with no air. Did your wife drive it with a flat tyre ?

 

In honesty unless you have a really good reason you are better off without them. Punctures should not be fixed on them, so it's a new tyre every time and they are more expensive. The ride is better without them too. But going back to my question, without a spare or repair kit they are useless.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately without this in writing you are going to be pushed to get anywhere. It is up to show being told this was one of the persuasive details that made you buy it.

Edited by Conniff
correct typo
Link to post
Share on other sites

They said they were Run Flats when speaking to them - They say they cannot retrieve original advert and also salesperson does not remember this conversation piece.

I prefer normal tyres as have had 2 minis so far myself but the point is they should have had them in the 1st place.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have checked in her boot and there is a compressor kit in there which says to me the tyres should have been run flat - The compressor kit is so that you can blow up the tyre again and it should last at least another 70 miles or so before deflating again.

In this case, what should I do to push them to fit run flats or at least refund me some money?

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi

Normally the compressor kits come with sealant and are for standard tyres, my wife has this in her corsa.

 

You don't need to add air to run flats the walls are designed to hold the weight of the car without air. I've had two cars with run flats, neither had a compressor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah ok. I thought the compressor would be for the run flats - I never asked Mini the question directly as thought the opposite!

Mini have confirmed this also so your info is spot on thank you very much.

Still really annoyed they said the car had run flats when they did not...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...