Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good luck with that. Most leases don't even follow the majority of the 2002 regulations (too old) let alone the new one. The £250 cap needs to be placed in the lease through a deed of variation and good luck getting freeholders to agree to that. It's not just some magical thing that just caps it one day. Some freeholders are only reducing them through lease extensions at massive costs (essentially buying out the difference in ground rent) and if you're doing that you might as well extend on a peppercorn anyway.
    • Yeah, I would confirm that anyway, as there is a separate sheet where I have to put in those details and my insurance number and driving licence number. That is on page 2 (page one is their allegations) then page three is a statement that you weren't the driver and space to give details who was driving. Page 4 is an empty sheet for a statement to explain the situation. So I will fill out my details as the driver on page 2, admitting I was driving at the time, and then attach my statement as above as a separate sheet. That should hopefully do it at this stage
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • Seems OK, except that you must provide your details (as the driver). Include your name, address, DOB and driving licence number. This is to comply with s172 of the Road Traffic Act. Keep a copy and get a free Certificate of Posting from the Post Office.
    • Dear all, some information/advice required please.   I recently received a Further Steps Notice about a fine from 19/03/2018 which I knew nothing about. It was regarding a vehicle parked on the street without tax ( It was covered up and there because the only key to it had been stolen, I had been away from home  and I was having trouble getting a new key cut and coded to the vehicle )  I had not made a change of address to DVLA which would be why I knew nothing about the fine until receiving the final steps notice dated 29th April 2024 and giving me 10 working days to pay, although the notice did not arrive till May 9th 2024. I emailed the London Collection and Compliance Centre on May 13th 2024 asking for any information and they sent me a copy of the original fine. It is for  £390 back vehicle tax, £85 cost and £600 fine.  I now have received a Notice of Enforcement dated 7th June 2024 demanding payment ( total £1036)  or an arrangement by 6am 15th June ( tomorrow )  My question is is it tool late now to question the £600 fine part of the total amount to be paid ? That amount seems punitive.  Would making a statuary declaration regarding having no knowledge of the original court date apply ? And any other advice gratefully received. I am on Universal Credit and apparently they have already taken £177 via benefit reductions which I wasn’t aware of, but does make it seem strange that they were also unable to contact me.    Many thanks for any assistance 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

HSBC Charges Reclaim HELP please **SETTLED**


HP Mum
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3038 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 86
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

You normally receive a letter from Mike T Walker saying they will be looking into your complaint(head of complaints centre of excellence😄

 

Your actual reply will then take approx 2to 3 weeks

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good,at least you know it is being dealt with

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I have had a reply.

 

 

Firstly - they don't retain details for more than 6y as time-banned under Limitations Act '80.

(Shame - I have kept them!!).

 

 

Then they say they have looked at card charges for last 6y and advise the late payment charges were applied correctly....

 

 

They further state:

" issues relating to level, fairness or lawfulness of bank charges have been the subject of legal proceedings between banks and OFT which started in mid 07.

These legal proceedings have now ended, with the Court confirming that the bank charges aren't capable of amounting to penalties at common law and that the level of them cant be assessed for fairness under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contract Regs.

An OFT ruling in April 06 stated that credit card fees should not exceed £12/fee.

We confirm that the fees applied to your card have not exceeded £12 [(they did before the 6y)]

As the fees that were applied to your card were applied correctly, I regret that we are unable to agree to your request to refund any fees...."

Then they continue:

"Re info that has been shared with the CRA: they are unable to amend the info that was "correctly" shared with the CRA. They have written to me before and stand by their decisions / actions..."

 

 

They then say:

"they don't have the original T&Cs as it was opened more than 6y ago. They say the continued use of my account constitutes my agreement to their t&cs...."

(I have not used the card for many, many years - only been reducing the balance - so does that constitute an agreement to their t&cs????!!!!!)

 

 

They say I can write to OFT within 6m.

 

 

SO - is this a stereotypical reply ?

Are they correct?

 

 

Be good to have some feedback on this and next steps....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

** UPDATE ** I have received an OFFER letter from Customer Services.

 

Firstly they state they think their charges are fair and reasonable.

They then refer to the 06 OFT published findings

"from its enquiry into default charges on credit cards, hsbc carefully considered the OFT's publication and altho' we do not accept its findings,

the OFT's investigation did lead to a change in market practices and hsbc decided, for commercial reasons

and in the interests of customers, to reduce its credit card default charges.

These charges do not affect charges that had already been applied."

 

They continue to state that:

"I am a valued customer of the bank (hmmm) and they would like to make a goodwill payment to me of £x,

which represents a 100% reduction of the charges payable, including interest at the contractual rate.

 

The payment is being offered on the basis that I agree not to make any further claims or take legal action on this matter.

 

The gesture is without prejudice to our right to impose and recover default charges in the future"

 

They then continue to state that

" their offer calculates contractual interest to date; that my debt was passed to Internal Collections mid 12; Interest and other charges ceased from this date"

 

They itemise charges.

They list all default charges applied, that they can find.

 

However, they state they only retain statements for 7y.

So their statements go back to Dec 08.

 

I have all statements form opening the account and my claim for CI is from 05.

 

Furthermore - they state their statements confirm where payments have been late or not received.

And any adverse data registered against my Credit File will be an accurate reflection of my payment history and account status.

Thus they see NO reason to remove any info they have registered.

 

SO here's the thing:

From 05 to now, Dec 15, their charges amount to £400+

my charges reclaim & CI claim amounts to £3220+

They have offered me £800+

They will not remove my bad credit rating

They want me to sign docs to prevent me taking any further legal action against them

Their statements start end 08

My claim refers back to mid 05.

The £ amount of 05 to end 08 is £2300+

 

I have read some of the other Reclaim threads and seen that most people are advised to reject the Bank's first offers.

 

What should I do now?

 

This is an interesting development for me.

I thought they were ignoring me (as Creation seem to be doing on my other thread!!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

reject it

and clearly state you have sent then info back to 2005

 

 

the oft decision did not say they were fair even if under £12 , but simply wouldn't investigate if under £12.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you think something like this will do:

 

 

Dear Sirs

I refer to your letter of x date offering to settle my claim at a reduced figure of £xx.

Whilst I appreciate your offer, the amount falls well-short of what I am claiming.

I have ALL statements and have already provided H with the charges H imposed in 05. H's claim to have statements dating back only to December 08 is irrelevant in this instance.

In order to assist you and to bring this matter to a satisfactory conclusion, I have attached an up to date SofC for your further consideration.

I calculate that H have taken £x in charges.

I am now claiming and amount of restitutionary interest of £xxx - A total claim of £xxx.

With regards to charges being more than 6 years old I refer back to S32 (1)© Limitations Act 1980, Kleinwort Benson-v-Lincoln City Council.

If Court Action is needed I will seek to rely on this.

I decline your offer and I look forward to hear back from you within the next 7 days.

Yours

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to be clear - my alleged debt to H is apx £300. Their penalty charges amount to £400.

So their "kind" offer only amounts to £100 above the combined alleged debt & their imposed charges.

It does not take into account any compound interest over a 10y period.

Link to post
Share on other sites

didn't really think through my last post...bit silly.

 

I owe H apx 300;

they owe me charges of apx 400.

 

 

So in essence H owes 100, but with the CI over 10y it amounts to H owing me much, much more.

 

Their offer of 800, although 700 more than they owe me, without CI, is much less than I requested in my Prelim and lba letters.

Waiting to see how they respond to my rejection letter...

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have rejected my CI claim.

 

They reply stating:

 

- I am claiming a refund of default charges dating back 10 years totalling £400+.

They say they have already taken into account the charges I detail.

 

- Their interest calculation was for apx the same amount as the charges refund claim (ie apx £400).

 

They say they calculated this figure in the same way interest is calculated at the time of debit from my account.

 

They state I have not incurred contractual interest for 3 years.

 

They say their offer works in my favour and ensures I have not lost out financially.

 

- Their interest figure was based on purchase apr of 14%

 

- my calculation was for 29.9% but their statements confirm an overall apr of 14.9%.

 

They state using 29.9% gives an incorrect interest calculation.

 

Their original offer stands.

 

 

So how do I respond to this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

any proof of this?

 

 

They state I have not incurred contractual interest for 3 years.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

then your spread claim to date must end then.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks

So do I alter the spreadsheet to reflect no CI after the last fee they charged me?

 

 

I thought CI was applicable until they repaid all the charges...?? No? Can someone please confirm this.

 

 

The dca got the account 3 years ago.

If I change the "Claim to" box date on the spreadsheet to this date it reduces the CI by almost 2k.

H's current offer would still be >£500 lower if using no CI after the account passed to dca.

 

 

What is best next course of action?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks

So do I alter the spreadsheet to reflect no CI after the last fee they charged me? - no the last date they charged you interest...

I thought CI was applicable until they repaid all the charges...?? No?

 

Can someone please confirm this.

 

The dca got the account 3 years ago.

 

If I change the "Claim to" box date on the spreadsheet to this date it reduces the CI by almost 2k.

 

H's current offer would still be >£500 lower if using no CI after the account passed to dca.

 

What is best next course of action?

 

you cant charge interest in restitution if they did levy it..unless you do court route on it

 

nothing to stop you asking for stat int that a court would award at 8% from the day after

they stopped their int mind

.

using the statint sheet on the cisheets total figure

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

little confused about this.

So do I alter the Claim to date to October 2012 at 29.9% ?

I get CI of about 1k and a total balance of about 1.4k

And then do I just manually work out 8% pa of 1.4k ?

 

 

I'm also a bit confused about their statement that they charged 14%. I need to check my statements in the morning. I was sure it was +/- 29%

Link to post
Share on other sites

sri internet in nrt Scotland is really bad

 

 

ill update tomorrow when its settled down

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just trying to compile a reply.

 

I have altered the CI sheet to remove CI after last interest added.

 

hsbc say they only charged me 14.9% interest.

 

I have checked the statements.

This is correct.

 

 

So am I wrong to charge them 29.9% on the CI spreadsheet?

 

If I use 14.9% I end up with lower than their settlement offer !

 

Should I instead allow 14.9 + statutory 8% ie: 22.9% ? or maybe 24.9 to allow for compensation??

 

Or can I argue the 29.9 as I was out of pocket all these years and that is compensation enough?

Link to post
Share on other sites

you are entitled to charge their avg int rate till they stopped charging it.

 

 

then take the TOTAL from the CISHEET

 

 

and pop it in as a whole figure on the day after that [and put that in the claim from box] in the statint sheet.

 

 

that will auto calc statint at 8% till the day they settle.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not quite sure I understand your instructions using the CI reclaim sheet?

 

I make a note of the total at, say 14.9%. Then delete it from the Claim Calculation total box?

 

Then I change the date in the Claim from box to be the day after the last charge.

And change the Claim to box to today's date?

Then change the Interest % to 8%.

 

The claim calculation box then shows the charges total (which has stayed the same)

and the 8% interest figure in the Compound interest box.

 

Do I take the Compound interest figure and add it to the original total?

 

for example - if I had an original total of £700,

8% of the charges incurred from the day after to today is apx £300

- so the total I can claim is £1000?

 

Or am I doing it wrong?

 

Should I be charging 8% on the total (original charges and CI) ???

Link to post
Share on other sites

This first spreadsheet is the latest version of the statutory interest calculator and is used for Single Premium PPIlink3.gif cases. It can also be used where rollover PPI is involved, i.e. a new loan re-financing a previous one and where PPI is included in one or more loans. It can also be used for S69 redress calculation on any sum, like on a closed/frozen interest PENALTY charges claim.

 

StatIntSheet v101.xls

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

as already indicated

leave the CISHEET and its dates as it was.

claim from date is the date of the first penalty charge on your list [assuming they are in date order on the cisheet]

 

claim to date is the last date they charged you their interest.

 

then take the WHOLE FIGURE from the CISHEET

 

pop it into the statint sheet as a single entry using the date 1 day after they stopped their interest.

 

the sheet will then auto calculate the 8% statint int you are entitled to as you've been deprived of that sum from the day they stopped charging int

 

so TWO spreadsheets are needed

 

ONE calcs the CI on each of their penalty charges from the date of each charge to the date they stopped charging their int and totals it

 

then THE OTHER calculates the 8% statint on that total sum till the day they settle the claim.......

 

include both spreadies and something like the attached file.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...