Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • HI DX Yes check it every month , after I reinstated the second DD I was checking every week. Also checked my bank statements and each payment has cleared. When responding to the court claim does it need to be in spefic terms ? Or laid out in a certain format? Or is it just a case of putting down in writing how I have expained it on CAG?
    • Come and engage with homelessness   Museum of Homelessness MUSEUMOFHOMELESSNESS.ORG The award-winning Museum of Homelessness (MoH) was founded in 2015 and is run by people with direct experience of homelessness. A very different approach. If you're in London you should go and see them
    • You have of course checked the car is now taxed and the £68 is stated against  the same reg?  If the tax for the same car did over lap, then I can't see you having an issue pleading not guilty Dx
    • The boundary wiill not be the yellow line.  Dx  
    • Afternoon all Looking for advice before I defend claim for car tax payment that the DVLA claim I owe £68 from an idemity claimback from my bank and unpaid tax  brief outline. Purchased car Jan 30th ,garage paid the tax for me after I gave them my card details  first payment £68 out in Feb 24  followed by payment of £31 from March due to end Jan 24 Checked one of my vehicle apps and about 7-10 days later car showing as untaxed? No reason why but it looks like DVLA cancelled it , this could be because I did not have the V5 and the gargae paid on my behalf but not sure did not receive a letter to say car was untaxed.  Fair enough I set up the tax again staight away in Feb 24  and first payment out Mar 31st , and each payment since has come out each month for £31 , this will end Feb/Mar 2025, slightly longer than the original tax set up, all good. I then claimed the £68 back from my bank as an indemity refund as obviously I had paid but DVLA had cancelled therefore it was a payment for nothing?  Last week recieved a SJP form dated 29th May stating that DVLA were claiming for unpaid tax and a false indemity claimback which of course is the £68. It also stated that I had received two previous letters offering me the oppotunity to pay that £68 but as I had not responded it was now a court claim that I must admit guilt for or defend. My post is held for weeks at a time from Royal Mail ( keepsafe) due to me receiving hospital tretament at weeks at a time that said I did not receive any previous letters from DVLA. I am happy to defend this and go to court but wondering what CAG members think? In summary I paid an initial amount of £68 and then a DD of £31 , tax cancelled  I set up a new DD at £31 a month all in the month of Feb 2024, I claimed the £68 back from my bank. DD has been coming out each month without issue and I have paperwork to show the breakdown for both DD setup's plus bank statements showing the payments coming out . The second DD set up has extended payments up to Feb/Mar 2025. DVLA claiming the £68 was ilegally claimed back despite the fact they cancelled the original DD for reasons unknown. Is this defendable ? I will post up documents including the original DD conformations 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

DWP now taking money from wages for 'debt' i dont own?


mabski
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3463 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

 

Im not sure if this is the correct place to post

 

 

can anyone help me with the dwp placing an attachment of earnings with my employer??

 

 

I received a letter 2 weeks ago saying that they were going to do it

but it never stated the amount or what it was for.

 

 

I phoned them up to question this and the reasons they gave were fraudulently claiming whilst working full time for the period aug-sept 2004,

fraudulently claiming whilst working part time for the same period and

also cashing a cancel giro from jan 2005

 

 

I asked them how to dispute this and

they told me to phone my local jobcentre which I tried but could get through to anyone who could help..

 

 

.. now I did sign on once in sept after getting a job but it was only to cover me whilst I worked my month in hand

but for the rest I haven't a clue where its come from..

 

 

. Today I've been paid and they have taken £150 off me and to be honest I really cant afford it

god knows what im going to do for Christmas this year as they are going to continue taking this amount every month

until my debt is paid off.

 

 

I've phoned them again this morning and asked for any proof that I owe this debt which they couldn't provide

and they said I would have to wait while they request the file from my local jobcentre

but they said they would not hold back taking any more money from future wages

saying if I could prove I didn't owe the money then I would get my money back..

 

 

Surely this cant be correct, these people cant just dip into my wages and take what they want without any proof whatsoever???

 

 

Has anyone dealt with this and held them back or am I up a certain creek without a paddle???

 

 

Thanks in advance for any help given

Link to post
Share on other sites

[...] fraudulently claiming whilst working full time for the period aug-sept 2004, fraudulently claiming whilst working part time for the same period and also cashing a cancel giro [...]. now I did sign on once in sept after getting a job [...] these people cant just dip into my wages

 

By your own admission, you admit claiming JSA whilst working - A case of double standards with the rhetoric don't you think ?

 

The DWP can indeed you an Attachment of Earnings to recover overpayments,

or they could wait until you start claiming your pension and recover the monies then.

 

 

The decision will have been made by (I believe) the recoveries unit at Cheltenham.

If you dispute the sum owed, this is the team you need to contact and make an appeal.

However, there is a strict time limit from when they first notified you of the overpayment.

 

If you are within the time limit, ask for a 'mandatory reconsideration'

and also send them a subject access request for all information relating to the period in question.

Once you have all the information to hand,

you will be in a better position to take the matter further if the reconsideration is rejected.

 

If you are outside the time limit for an appeal, then your best bet is to negotiate a more reasonable repayment plan

- Forget trying to use the statute of limitations, as this will not put a halt to the recovery process.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

By your own admission, you admit claiming JSA whilst working - A case of double standards with the rhetoric don't you think ?

 

 

Not really I had been out of work for a while and would not have been able to take the job had I not been able to claim one last time, you try going a month on £50 with travelling expenses to get to work and I thought they were to help you get back to work... so no in my mind there was no double standard at all claiming it enabled me to get off benefits and I've been paying tax for the last ten years. Apparently I had 13 months to dispute it now they say I have to pay... which I think is unbelievably unfair as they have doubled up what they actually paid me and invented a double cashed giro... So basically they are taking what they are not entitled to and I have no right to dispute it...

Link to post
Share on other sites

get the DWP SAR sent off

 

 

its free

 

 

look in the library section.

 

 

without giving you proof

they should not be doing this

 

 

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can dispute an overpayment by requesting a Mandatory Reconsideration and, if necessary, appealing to the tribunal within 1 month of being informed of the decision. If you have good reasons for making this request late, you can appeal up to 13 months after you were informed of the decision - that's an absolute limit. Note the qualifier - "after you were informed" - the clock only starts ticking once they let you know. Do they say they have previously written to you about this matter?

 

If more than 13 months have elapsed, your options are very limited. Since you seem to be saying that at least some of this overpayment is due to fraud on your part, I'd advise extreme caution in how you approach this. You can, as advised, send them a SAR - this should at least shed some light on how the amount has been calculated.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

hi all

 

 

Does anyone know who I can lodge a compliant with over this ??

 

 

So far I have made numerous phone calls and sent three letters requesting proof that I owe this debt

and they have been unable to provide me with any proof whatsoever.

 

 

.. The latest phonecall I've had with them this morning they stated that they requested proof on the 28th of November

and again yesterday but nothing has been forthcoming so where do I go from here?

 

 

They will be deducting money again this weekend without being able to prove that I actually owe the money

ruining my families Christmas in the process.

 

 

It seems like they are a law until themselves and when I click on make a complaint on the DWP website nothing actually comes up,

just their customer charter,

 

 

is there anybody I can actually complain to about this matter???

 

 

Thanks in advance for any help given

Link to post
Share on other sites

did you get that SAR sent off?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks rae I couldn't find that I wouldn't call it a sar I just sent a letter asking for proof that the debt was mine and so far they haven't provided anything just fed me the same bull as last time, that they would have it in a few days...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then send a SAR. It won't help you before Christmas but by law they have to provide all the information they hold about you within 40 days including the information you've already asked for. If you'd done it when first suggested you would have been well on the way to the deadline, but as it is, the sooner the better. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/dwp-request-for-personal-information

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...