Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

LLOYDS BANK PPI Refund??


JGJ
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3547 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all,

 

We have received confirmation of PPI refunds for 3 very old Business accs which were mis-sold.

Inclusive in the docs received from LLoyds was this page stating:

 

Please be aware that if your credit agreement is in arrears when we make the PPI refund, we will use part or all of the PPI refund to repay towards these arrears. If the PPI refund is more than the arrears on your account we will then refund the remainder of the PPI to you.

 

Your loan has been transferred to our Wholesale Banking Recoveries department and the amount we pay will be used to reduce your outstanding debt.

 

1)There were no outstanding debts on any of the 3 itemised business loans.

 

2) There is a ref on a CRA file to an old defaulted acc.

LLoyds assigned this acc to a CAIS member in 2012 and CRA file marked satisfied.

 

3) Do LLoyds have any claims or can they "set off" bearing in mind they assigned the defaulted acc to a third party, who subsequently gave up the chase and it is now Stat Barred since 2013.

 

All information guidance or advice re above points, before I consider sending the forms of acceptance back to LLoyds,will be as usual greatly appreciated.

 

"EXEMPLO DUCEMUS"

Link to post
Share on other sites

ims21

 

Further info re the alleged debt LLoyds are referring to ( Tel call from there Recoveries Commercial Banking Dep} late pm today and they have revealed that the alleged debt they will set off the upheld PPI against is an old debt from the bank charges debaucle which was stayed in the courts system and is now more then 7yrs old his words. This forgotten about acc is surely Stat Barred and they will not be able to set off with PPI award.Looking through old docs Wescot made a failed attempt at collection and stated they were taking it off their files and we would not hear anything more from them Wescot and subsequently this alleged debt has not been serviced by ourselves for 7 yrs plus.

 

All further advice/info/guidance will be gratefully received, they have informed my wife by tel call that they will call us Friday 19th pm.

 

This alleged debt will be well over stat barred guidlines.

 

"EXEMPLO DUCEMUS"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello All,

After talking to a named person from the Recoveries Commercial Banking dept of LLOYDS on Friday, re the PPI on the 3 accs being upheld and after looking at the form of ACCEPTANCE from the Customer Care, Payment Protection. I am rather dubious of signing the acceptance form. The named person told me that there will be no "set off" of the upheld funds and that I would receive the "full upheld amount" and the cheque would be sent to us within 28 days.

He rang us at the agreed time the next day, after we had contacted them re the "set off" and he confirmed that there would be no "set off" applied.

 

The Acceptance form is thus:

 

If you agree to this offer, please sign and return in the envelope provided.

 

We, Mr & Mrs ****** , accept the offer made as per the letter dated September 2014 in full and final settlement of our complaint.

 

We understand the refund will be paid for by cheque and will include interest where appropriate. We understand that you will use part or all of the refund to repay any arrears that are due at the time the payment is made.

 

Mr ******

Signed

Dated

 

Mrs ******

Signed

Dated.

 

After obtaining the verbal terms from the named person who contacted us, that no "set off" would be applied and we would receive the full upheld amount by cheque within 28 days and now reading the above letter, we are at odds with signing the form of acceptance I really do not trust LLOYDS.

 

All comments, words of warning/advice, will be gratefully received.

 

"EXEMPLO DUCEMUS"

Link to post
Share on other sites

ims21,

Thank you for your as ever swift reply and yes a good idea. I do not trust LLoyds at all after lots of previous problems with them stemming from the bank charges debaucle.

 

"EXEMPLO DUCEMUS"

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...