Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi All. A family friends car was having issues when she was on a trip visiting family up north at the begining of January.  She ended up leaving it at my friends garage in the same location, who parked it on his forecourt to investigate the issue, howver he said most likely it is beyond economical repair as its a serious gearbox fault. In the meantime i replaced her car with one of my spare cars. The insurance on the car then expired in at the end of January.  When the insurance expired, I sent a paper V890 paper as i didnt have her V5 Reference number in hand to do it online (i have a copy of this).  She didnt mention she hadnt recieved any confirmation as she didnt know if she would get one.  She then cancelled her road tax at the end of March (i think) as she was paying by DD. She then was travelling up north so didnt get her ,ail until last week. She recievd a letter dated 09/04/2024 stating she had failed to insure the vehcile and there was a £100 fine which could be reduced to £50 if she respons by 11/05/2024.  As soon as we noticed, i got her to dig  out the V5 and SORN'd the vehicle.   My friend has been a bit slow in checking the fault, however i suspect it will still be scrapped and is still on his forecourt. Is this possible to appeal?
    • worthy to not forget Just to let you know this bunch Kensington have been fined £1.225m by the financial regulator for treating borrowers who were in arrears unfairly. Claim those charges back plus the interest and tell them not to add any more to the account. There are a few news stories here you can get the info for a letter to send to them. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8615870.stm  
    • Hi All. I went to visit a family friend in Rochdale on a new housing estate opposite a old row of houses. The location is Royle Road, Postcode OL11 3PE. I was originally parked in parking bays outside the old houses, then moved the car, when I noticed my tyre was flat, so parked on what looked like double yellows to use his air pump to check and inflate the tyres before we left the house.   In the time i went inside to sort the pump and power supply i got a PCN.  The tyre then got changed (has a puncture) and we left. PCN Number:         RE######## Date:             04/05/2024 Time:             20:36 Observation:         20:34 to 20:36 Reported location:     Royle Park Road Reason:        Parked in a restricted street during prescribed hours (Code: 01) I believe this PCN is not correct and has grounds to appeal: 1. My friend who moved into the property around 6 months ago, swears that even though it has old double yellows marked, they are not current or council marked.   He said the property development company had said they had marked them for ease of access during development. 2. The road i was parked on was Royle Road.  The PCN was issued for Royle Park Road, which is about 400 yards up the road. 3. There are no sign posts or marking showing parking  restriction hours in the entire area (there maybe on Royle park Road). I have attached a map of the Location where i parked as a red dot. I have 2 questions: a.  Is there a way to check where double yellow lines are marked on some register to check if they are current? b. Can my grounds of appeal simply be, wrong location, wrong offence? Thanks in advance. Map_20240505.pdf
    • you made it very confusing, though i doubt any of it was ever read by the delivery franchise for DPD. your saving grace might well be you didn't select your own address (though if you are all the same postcode..??) and neither mentioned a safe space other than another neighbour. but with the actual delivery address on the parcel, it appears the driver had a choice of 3 addresses, all under the same post code with differing house numbers. so chose the label one but left it on your doorstep. play it carefully and along with the photo and the retailers requirement you should be ok.   dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Letting Agent not protected tenants deposits (M&W Lettings)


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3431 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 178
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Bringing St Leonard's into the 21st century one house at a time

Location St Leonards, East Sussex, United Kingdom (Tonbridge, United Kingdom) Industry Real Estate Jon Clements's Overview

 

Current

  • Director at M&W Sales and Lettings ltd

Past

  • Physical commodity Trading 07930 460338 at Arlington Commodities Ltd
  • Sales Trader European Equities. at BTIG
  • VP and Senior Trader, European Equity Trading at AllianceBernstein

 

see less

 

see all

Education

M & W lettings has only been in existence since May 2013

JC and LS are the sole directors.

Edited by ims21
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just feeding in further info re: website.

 

Paddock Wood office = mandwresidentiallettings.co.uk

St Leonards office = mandwsalesandlettings.co.uk

 

JC is based (see Team) in St Leonards and is still a director of Paddock Wood according to Companies House listing. LS is based in Paddock Wood. Both look similar on the websites but seem to have different listings/registered details at Companies House.

 

There were two agencies originally but the St Leonards one has recently been renamed and registered M&W Sales and Lettings.

Link to post
Share on other sites

there are actually three companies listed M&W SALES AND LETTINGS LLP, M&W SALES AND LETTINGS (ST LEONARDS) LTD, & M&W PROPERTY CONSULTANTS LTD but only two websites I have seen which I list on my previous post

Link to post
Share on other sites

M&W Property Consultants Ltd - 08522837 - Active

 

http://companycheck.co.uk/company/08522837/MW-PROPERTY-CONSULTANTS-LTD/directors-secretaries

 

M&W Sales & Lettings LLP - OC385074 - Active

 

http://companycheck.co.uk/company/OC385074/MW-SALES-AND-LETTINGS-LLP/directors-secretaries

 

Arlington Commodities Ltd - 08195986 - Dissolved

 

http://companycheck.co.uk/company/08195986/ARLINGTON-COMMODITIES-LTD/directors-secretaries

 

Look at the Directors Names

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anyone know how to find out if a company is VAT registered? I know one LL who battled for a refund from M&W and the withheld the VAT element. It occurs to me that I've never seen a VAT number, have just gone through documents from them and there is no number listed on their letterheads.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Check on their website as they should display the VAT number I think. I can't see how they can charge VAT on the deposit as this isn't income - her charge may incur VAT if she is registered? Check these out for information:

 

accountingweb.co.uk/anyanswers/it-possible-find-out-if-company-vat-registered

 

hmrc.gov.uk/vat/sectors/consumers/basics.htm

Link to post
Share on other sites

Relevant parts on the HMRC link above :

 

VAT on bills and receipts

 

Most retail prices on bills and receipts include VAT - it is not shown separately. However, some may also show the VAT element as a separate line.

This doesn't mean you're being charged extra - it just shows how much tax is included in the price.

Non-retail invoices from VAT-registered suppliers - for example from builders, or painters and decorators who are VAT registered - must show a separate amount for VAT.

They must also show the nine-digit VAT Registration Number of the business.

 

How to check if a VAT number is valid

 

You can check whether a UK VAT number is valid by following the link below:

 

Check a UK VAT registration number

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you suspect a VAT fraud

 

If you suspect that a firm is avoiding paying VAT, or charging VAT when they aren't VAT registered, you can report them to HMRC

by calling the free Customs Hotline. You don't have to give your name or any personal details.

Link to post
Share on other sites

IIRC the turnover has to be more than £100k/year to be registered or liable for VAT.

Anyway that really is not the issue; Trading standards and Police should be informed of their fraud and business activities.

Also all the properties they deal with must have an EPC to go with them and that is also regulated by Trading Standards.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have looked at an invoice that I received from M&W some months ago on which they charged VAT. The invoice does not state their VAT number which it is legally required to do if it is VAT registered. So either they are not registered for VAT but fraudulently adding VAT or they have merely omitted to include the VAT number which is a technical breach and a lot less serious.

 

I supplied them with an EPC on my property but have notified Trading Standards because of a number of issues I have had with M&W not dissimilar to those mentioned by others on this site.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand that at least one of their registered companies is registered for VAT and it seems to still be valid so they should have been charging, and passing the VAT onto HMRC and also providing any relevant VAT refunds.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If we assume they are VAT registered, and assume the company that is registered was the one that charged for VAT, then all is fine.

 

Can we get the correct name of the company that is registered and the name on the invoice you received GroanUp to see if they match.

 

Further question, if they charged a fee of XXXX = VAT and there was a refund on that fee, would they be legally in the clear if they withheld the VAT element refund?

 

Would they not also need to refund the amount of VAT they charged, because that is a % of the fee, then claim this back on their next VAT submission?

 

As consumers, this is a real bit of money, as a VAT registered business, it's a paper exercise unless the company buys in goods, which they presumably don't in large quantities.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The invoice which was dated January this year and was issued by M&W Property Consultants Limited. I was mistaken and I have just noticed the following VAT number 161 5137 31 on the invoice.

 

The correspondence from mydeposit refers to M&W Residential Lettings and the unsigned terms and conditions that M&W issued refers only to M&W and not to a company. Another reason I think why those terms and conditions are invalid.

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3431 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...