Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, I have an old Capital One credit card debt under £1500 for which I've been paying £1 a month for 5+ years. I did a CCA request to Lowell and received the original signed CA plus statements from date of inception to the end of 2019. I can see from the statements that no payments were credited to the account for all of 2019. I know payments were made as they were part of my DMP with Payplan. At the time the account was with Fredrickson.  They have not provided any statements from 2020 to present and I am writing to them to request these. So I'm sure the balance they are pursuing is incorrect - can I dispute the debt amount based on this and render it unenforceable? I've trawled the forums and Google searched but can't find an answer, so apologies if it's been asked before. Any input most appreciated, thank you :-)  
    • Thank you for your comments everyone. I have spoken to Ico about recording my phone calls for my personal use and also mentioned it to a law firm they said i was ok as long as it was not shared and for my personal use. I would never share it. I can easy prove i need to record on disability grounds.. I normally make videos how i am to document my conditions and how i am affected. I have in the past obtained a phone call to doctors to reception by GDPR. Normally I have my partner with me now. The only way i found is to have a advocate with me. even with my partner with me a trainee gp seen a short video and said in front of my partner “are they voluntary or involuntary”   
    • LOL LOL ‘Stormy weather’: Biden skewers Trump at White House correspondents’ dinner | US elections 2024 | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM US president made fun of Republican frontrunner’s legal woes while critics of his handling of Gaza war protested outside  
    • LOL   Inside the Home Office Rwanda revolt as officials run from Sunak’s ‘s**t show’ INEWS.CO.UK 'This law is unworkable, not just inhumane'. Insiders say there is 'a lot of discontent' in the Department over the scheme   
    • wonder if sunak will revoke/deny their passports when they get there? Then announce that deportations to Rwanda have started ..
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Trucker v Barclays **WON**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6120 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Trucker

 

I live in Essex and my case was forwarded to Basildon Combined County Court within a week of receiving Barclays Defence. They then transferred it to Southend at the beginning of April. I was then given a Stay by the Judge at Southend to last until 27 June. I have just successfully applied to have this lifted and have a hearing on 27 June at 10.00am so Southend seem to deal with things quite quickly and don't have a long waiting time by the looks of things. It more depends how quickly you hear as the typists tend to get a few weeks behind!

 

Great thread by the way.

 

Karenann

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 138
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

As requested threads merged (I found 7):)

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Waiting times for court hearings vary from area to area.

You need to find out the backlog times from your local court.for example my Court has a 4 week backlog so anything that I or the defence submit to them will not be looked at for 4 weeks.

This is why its important to inform the Courts immediately you are given or offered settlement and safely have the money.

This helps the Courts to allocate fresh cases.

Even with a Court hearing Barclays are only known to settle a week or so before the date arrives.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Martin,

 

It wasn't my threads that i wanted merged (lol), perhaps i didn't make that clear, it was bob_and_wendy's. I said i would pm a mod for them as everytime they updated their story it was in a new thread.

 

Mine is gonna be confusing now to anyone reading from the start but thanks anyway for taking the time and effort.

 

Trucker

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok

 

2 letters received this morning.

 

First in regard to asking for charges back

" I refer to our letter dated 19 April" (actually it 21 May)"

 

No offer but will have answer by 9th July

 

second letter in regard to S.A.R - (Subject Access Request)

 

quote

" I can confirm that we are unable to provide data prior to 1995 as we are only required to hold data for up to 12 years"

 

Thoughts please!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I assume the two letters refer to two separate cases.

 

In the first letter, ignore their timetable and stick to your own.

 

As for second letter, you could reinforce your request by calling their free phone number: 0800282390.

 

Many members have got their statements by calling the Barclays freephone number above.

Link to post
Share on other sites

first letter sounds like the standard follow-up to the 'we'll get back to you...' rubbish. (Yes, they DO send them!:D )

 

Second letter sounds familiar; I have the same one. General consensus at the moment is that 12 years is as long as Barclays keep data on file. don't know what 'requirement' they're working to, but at least they're not claiming that the DPA has a six-year cutoff!

 

Have you seen this thread?

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/80486-claiming-beyond-6-yrs.html#post712882

 

;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Morning All

 

I recently visited a hole in the wall at a branch in Carlisle. There was a big poster on the window. "step inside and meet the nicest people in Cumbria." It must have been full of CAG members ...lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah had i good read of that thread

 

I was led to believe that Barclays hold info back to at least early 80S

 

I was told by a Barclays contact that they actually retain the records from the date of opening the account if still active.

But the informant wouldnt put it in writing...Doh, if only I was recording the call eh?

.

http://www.findmadeleine.com/

http://news.sky.com/skynews/madeleine

 

If I dont reply to a direct question please feel free to PM me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Silly Me

 

Despite sending my LBA at the beggining of June I have let Barclays use the whole 8 weeks that they indicated in a letter "we will contact you soon but certainly no later than 9 July." Well thats today and nothing.

 

As i am strapped for cash and can not afford court fees at present it looks like i will have to go vis FOS to reclaim my charges back. Am i right in thinking that going this route will not allow me to claim s69 8%.

 

I have spoken to the FOS today and they tell me that their process takes up to 12 weeks, which is probably quicker than court. He did however point out that i would not be bound to any decision via them and could still go to court afterwards if i was not happy. Any thoughts welcome!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have just spoken to FOS again. The very nice lady told me to include s69 interest of 8% on the complaint form The final decision will be made by the adjudicator as to whether interest should be awarded, but if i don't claim it he/she won't award it. Glad i didn't get to Post Ofiice yesterday.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Folks

 

Have just got off the phone to B's customer relations. They are putting letter in post today offering me £730, out of a claim of £975. Sorry to dissapoint you all but due to my current financial situation i am going to accept it. It will give me the funds to start court procedings against CAP1.

 

Just 1 question though, i notice from other threads that the consensus is to change the wording of the settlement form, has anyone had any problems doing this at Customer Relations stage?

 

Trucker

Link to post
Share on other sites

First question is: are there any terms of acceptance that you're not happy with? If not, no problem. The main thing to be wary of is signing away any restriction on further claims against them.

 

I think maybe you have less clout in this situation than in a pre-court settlement, where they are defending your action. I assume they're calling this a 'gesture of goodwill'? they could withdraw the offer if you object too much.

 

:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All

 

Acceptance letter returned on 14th. Their cover letter said payment will be made within 10 working days of receipt of acceptance. I wonder how long they will take? I can guess...lol

 

Trucker

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6120 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...